On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they
> > would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge
> > window around -
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they
> would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge
> window around -rc5 already.
>
> But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: p
Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-28 15:37:41)
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:13:38PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests
> > into
> > two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
> > drm-intel/drm-int
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:13:38PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests
> into
> two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
> drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next.
>
> I think a simple course of action might b
+ Dave and Daniel
+ Stephen
Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-26 09:29:59)
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:43:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > > this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> > > vmalloc
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:43:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> > vmalloc interface rework. It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
> > the equivalent of get
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> vmalloc interface rework. It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
> the equivalent of get_vm_area + actually faulting in all PTEs in
> the allocated area. It was
Hi Andrew,
this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
vmalloc interface rework. It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
the equivalent of get_vm_area + actually faulting in all PTEs in
the allocated area. It was originally addeds for Xen (which isn't
modular to start w
8 matches
Mail list logo