On 10/05/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:22:59AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree with
>> the patch (and the line between your "Makes good sense to me." and a "Feel
>> free
On 10/05/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:22:59AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree with
the patch (and the line between your Makes good sense to me. and a Feel
free to add my
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:23:53AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> It had been sent twice to both linux-kernel and netdev, and when going
>> through old linux-kernel emails I considered it trivial enough (people
>> might argue about dead email addresses, but not about dead
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:22:59AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree with
>> the patch (and the line between your "Makes good sense to me." and a "Feel
>> free to add my ACK to this" is really thin).
>
> No, the
Adrian Bunk wrote:
It had been sent twice to both linux-kernel and netdev, and when going
through old linux-kernel emails I considered it trivial enough (people
might argue about dead email addresses, but not about dead URLs).
I could send such patches to Andrew for that he includes them in
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree
with the patch (and the line between your "Makes good sense to me."
and a "Feel free to add my ACK to this" is really thin).
No, the line is easy and obvious: if there is any doubt, DO NOT ASSUME.
If
mitter: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:18 2007 +0200
>> >
>> > remove broken URLs from net drivers' output
>> >
>> > Remove broken URLs (www.scyld.com) from network drivers' logging
>> output.
6605c8ad6a9161ca527fa
>> Parent: b96687768a9ac0fdd005c7700093ebb24b93450f
>> Author: Markus Dahms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> AuthorDate: Wed May 9 07:58:10 2007 +0200
>> Committer: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:1
7fa
> Parent: b96687768a9ac0fdd005c7700093ebb24b93450f
> Author: Markus Dahms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> AuthorDate: Wed May 9 07:58:10 2007 +0200
> Committer: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:18 2007 +0200
>
> remove broken URLs from n
Dahms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AuthorDate: Wed May 9 07:58:10 2007 +0200
Committer: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:18 2007 +0200
remove broken URLs from net drivers' output
Remove broken URLs (www.scyld.com) from network drivers' logging outpu
Dahms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AuthorDate: Wed May 9 07:58:10 2007 +0200
Committer: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:18 2007 +0200
remove broken URLs from net drivers' output
Remove broken URLs (www.scyld.com) from network drivers' logging output.
URLs in comments
: b96687768a9ac0fdd005c7700093ebb24b93450f
Author: Markus Dahms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AuthorDate: Wed May 9 07:58:10 2007 +0200
Committer: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:18 2007 +0200
remove broken URLs from net drivers' output
Remove broken URLs (www.scyld.com) from
: b96687768a9ac0fdd005c7700093ebb24b93450f
Author: Markus Dahms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AuthorDate: Wed May 9 07:58:10 2007 +0200
Committer: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CommitDate: Wed May 9 08:58:18 2007 +0200
remove broken URLs from net drivers' output
Remove broken URLs
from net drivers' output
Remove broken URLs (www.scyld.com) from network drivers' logging
output.
URLs in comments and other strings are left intact.
Signed-off-by: Markus Dahms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree
with the patch (and the line between your Makes good sense to me.
and a Feel free to add my ACK to this is really thin).
No, the line is easy and obvious: if there is any doubt, DO NOT ASSUME.
If they
Adrian Bunk wrote:
It had been sent twice to both linux-kernel and netdev, and when going
through old linux-kernel emails I considered it trivial enough (people
might argue about dead email addresses, but not about dead URLs).
I could send such patches to Andrew for that he includes them in
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:22:59AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I thought it was just an informal tag to mark which people did agree with
the patch (and the line between your Makes good sense to me. and a Feel
free to add my ACK to this is really thin).
No, the line is easy
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:23:53AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
It had been sent twice to both linux-kernel and netdev, and when going
through old linux-kernel emails I considered it trivial enough (people
might argue about dead email addresses, but not about dead URLs).
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
