On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 12:13:41 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 7:50 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it
on a temporary branch over here
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:45:30AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs
>>>
>>> under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's
>>> not
>>> what you were looking for.
>>
>>
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:49:28 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
are you fine just picking this up
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
>> are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10?
>>
>> I'll defer other
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 7:50 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put
> it
> on a temporary branch over here
>
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs
>
> under the
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10?
I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to
5.11 then.
I'm OK taking it,
Can we get this series picked up either in Al's base.set_fs tree, or
a branch in the riscv tree?
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:58:17AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series converts riscv to the new set_fs less world and is on top of this
> branch:
>
>
>
Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10?
I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to
5.11 then.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> now that we've
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 23:55:15 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:29PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
The first four patches are general improvements and enablement for all nommu
ports, and might make sense to merge through the above base branch.
Seems like it to
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:29PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>
>> The first four patches are general improvements and enablement for all nommu
>> ports, and might make sense to merge through the above base branch.
>
> Seems like it to me. These won't work without the SET_FS code so I'm OK if
On Sun, 06 Sep 2020 22:58:17 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Hi all,
this series converts riscv to the new set_fs less world and is on top of this
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git/log/?h=base.set_fs
The first four patches are general improvements
Hi all,
this series converts riscv to the new set_fs less world and is on top of this
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git/log/?h=base.set_fs
The first four patches are general improvements and enablement for all nommu
ports, and might make sense to merge
12 matches
Mail list logo
