Re: revoke: no revoke for nommu

2007-03-27 Thread Wu, Bryan
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:12 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There's just no sane way to revoke shared memory mappings for NOMMU so lets > disable the thing completely when CONFIG_MMU=n. > > Cc: Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: David Howells <[EMAIL PRO

Re: revoke: no revoke for nommu

2007-03-26 Thread Wu, Bryan
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 13:25 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's just no sane way to revoke shared memory mappings for NOMMU so lets > > disable the thing completely when CONFIG_MMU=n. > > I think that's reasonable for now - we can always add suppo

Re: revoke: no revoke for nommu

2007-03-26 Thread David Howells
Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's just no sane way to revoke shared memory mappings for NOMMU so lets > disable the thing completely when CONFIG_MMU=n. I think that's reasonable for now - we can always add support as far as possible later. David - To unsubscribe from this list:

revoke: no revoke for nommu

2007-03-26 Thread Pekka J Enberg
From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There's just no sane way to revoke shared memory mappings for NOMMU so lets disable the thing completely when CONFIG_MMU=n. Cc: Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <