Re: rt_sigreturn rejects a substitute stack frame as invalid.

Steven Stewart-Gallus writes: > Hello, > > I'm not totally sure that GLibc's setcontext is safe to use in a > signal handler. So, I decided I was going to play things safe and let > rt_sigreturn switch stacks for me instead. However, rt_sigreturn seems > to reject my substitute stack frame

Re: rt_sigreturn rejects a substitute stack frame as invalid.

Steven Stewart-Gallus writes: Hello, I'm not totally sure that GLibc's setcontext is safe to use in a signal handler. So, I decided I was going to play things safe and let rt_sigreturn switch stacks for me instead. However, rt_sigreturn seems to reject my substitute stack frame as

rt_sigreturn rejects a substitute stack frame as invalid.

Hello, I'm not totally sure that GLibc's setcontext is safe to use in a signal handler. So, I decided I was going to play things safe and let rt_sigreturn switch stacks for me instead. However, rt_sigreturn seems to reject my substitute stack frame as invalid and I'm not sure why. Thank you,

rt_sigreturn rejects a substitute stack frame as invalid.

Hello, I'm not totally sure that GLibc's setcontext is safe to use in a signal handler. So, I decided I was going to play things safe and let rt_sigreturn switch stacks for me instead. However, rt_sigreturn seems to reject my substitute stack frame as invalid and I'm not sure why. Thank you,