Re: sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Robert Hancock
Jeff Garzik wrote: Robert Hancock wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Ping... sata_nv status is still a bit open for 2.6.24, and I would like to move us forward a bit. * Kuan's patch... it has been confirmed (and is needed), correct? can someone work up a good patch for 2.6.24? The only one I

Re: sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Robert Hancock wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Ping... sata_nv status is still a bit open for 2.6.24, and I would like to move us forward a bit. * Kuan's patch... it has been confirmed (and is needed), correct? can someone work up a good patch for 2.6.24? The only one I ever received was

Re: sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Robert Hancock
Jeff Garzik wrote: Ping... sata_nv status is still a bit open for 2.6.24, and I would like to move us forward a bit. * Kuan's patch... it has been confirmed (and is needed), correct? can someone work up a good patch for 2.6.24? The only one I ever received was badly word-wrapped, and at

sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Robert Hancock wrote: Kuan Luo wrote: Robert hancock wrote: What problem does this resolve? I tested it against the cache flush/NCQ write switching problem we've been trying to solve, and it doesn't look like it fixes that one - if I apply this patch and then remove the udelay(20) in

sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Robert Hancock wrote: Kuan Luo wrote: Robert hancock wrote: What problem does this resolve? I tested it against the cache flush/NCQ write switching problem we've been trying to solve, and it doesn't look like it fixes that one - if I apply this patch and then remove the udelay(20) in

Re: sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Robert Hancock
Jeff Garzik wrote: Ping... sata_nv status is still a bit open for 2.6.24, and I would like to move us forward a bit. * Kuan's patch... it has been confirmed (and is needed), correct? can someone work up a good patch for 2.6.24? The only one I ever received was badly word-wrapped, and at

Re: sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Robert Hancock wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Ping... sata_nv status is still a bit open for 2.6.24, and I would like to move us forward a bit. * Kuan's patch... it has been confirmed (and is needed), correct? can someone work up a good patch for 2.6.24? The only one I ever received was

Re: sata_nv and 2.6.24 (was Re: fixed a bug of adma in rhel4u5 with HDS7250SASUN500G.)

2008-01-23 Thread Robert Hancock
Jeff Garzik wrote: Robert Hancock wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Ping... sata_nv status is still a bit open for 2.6.24, and I would like to move us forward a bit. * Kuan's patch... it has been confirmed (and is needed), correct? can someone work up a good patch for 2.6.24? The only one I