Hi Peter,
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I'm working on this text. I see the following in kernel/sched/core.c:
>>
>> [[
>> static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I'm working on this text. I see the following in kernel/sched/core.c:
>
> [[
> static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> const struct sched_attr *attr,
>
Hi Peter,
I'm working on this text. I see the following in kernel/sched/core.c:
[[
static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
const struct sched_attr *attr,
bool user)
{
...
int policy = attr->sched_polic
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:21:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:55:28AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Looks like a good set of comments from Juri. Could you revise and
> > resubmit?
>
> Yeah, I'll try and get it done today, but there
On 05/05/2014 09:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
But, in that case, I need to know the
copyright and license you want to use. Please see
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/licenses.html
>>>
>>> GPLv2 + DOC
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> >> But, in that case, I need to know the
> >> copyright and license you want to use. Please see
> >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/licenses.html
> >
> > GPLv2 + DOC (not v2+) sounds good.
>
> I'm a little unclea
On 05/05/2014 09:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:55:28AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Looks like a good set of comments from Juri. Could you revise and
>> resubmit?
>
> Yeah, I'll try and get it done today, but there's a few icky bugs
> wa
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:55:28AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Looks like a good set of comments from Juri. Could you revise and
> resubmit?
Yeah, I'll try and get it done today, but there's a few icky bugs
waiting for my attention as well, I'll do me bestest :-)
>
Hi Peter,
Looks like a good set of comments from Juri. Could you revise and
resubmit?
By the way, I assume you are just writing this page as raw text.
While I'd prefer to get proper man markup source, I'll add that
if you if you don't :-/. But, in that case, I need to know the
copyright and lice
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, but I was travelling for work.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:09:37 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:25PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Thanks for the revision. More comments below. Could you revise in
> > the
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:25PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the revision. More comments below. Could you revise in
> the light of those comments, and hopefully also after feedback from
> Juri and Dario?
New text below; hopefully a little clearer. If n
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:25PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the revision. More comments below. Could you revise in
> the light of those comments, and hopefully also after feedback from
> Juri and Dario?
>
> >
> > sched_attr::sched_runtime
> >
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the revision. More comments below. Could you revise in
the light of those comments, and hopefully also after feedback from
Juri and Dario?
On 04/29/2014 06:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
> Juri,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Juri, Dario, Can you have a look at the 2nd part; I'm not at all sure I
got the activate/release the right way around.
My current thinking was that we activate first, and then release it to
go run. But googling the terms
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 04/28/2014 10:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > find below an updated manpage, I did not apply the comments on parts
> > that are identical to SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2) in order to keep
Hi Peter,
On 04/28/2014 10:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> find below an updated manpage, I did not apply the comments on parts
> that are identical to SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2) in order to keep these texts
> in alignment. I feel that if we change one we should also change the
> other,
Hi Michael,
find below an updated manpage, I did not apply the comments on parts
that are identical to SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2) in order to keep these texts
in alignment. I feel that if we change one we should also change the
other, and such a 'patch' is best done separate from the new manpage
itself
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:34:49 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:47:25PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Following the review comments that one or two people sent, are you
> > planning to send in a revised version of this page?
>
> Yes, I jus
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:34:49 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Also, is there any test code lying about somewhere that I could play with?
I have a deadline program you can play with too:
http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/deadline.c
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:47:25PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Following the review comments that one or two people sent, are you
> planning to send in a revised version of this page?
Yes, I just suck at getting around to it :-(, I'll do it first thing
tomorrow.
> A
Hi Peter,
Following the review comments that one or two people sent, are you
planning to send in a revised version of this page? Also, is there any
test code lying about somewhere that I could play with?
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2
Il 10/04/2014 09:47, Juri Lelli ha scritto:
Hi all,
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:42:04 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:19:11PM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
The following "real-time" policies are also supported, for
why the "'s?
I borrowed those from SCHED_SETSCHEDULE
Hi all,
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:42:04 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:19:11PM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > > The following "real-time" policies are also supported, for
> >
> > why the "'s?
>
> I borrowed those from SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2).
>
> > > sched_attr::sched
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:19:11PM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > The following "real-time" policies are also supported, for
>
> why the "'s?
I borrowed those from SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2).
> > sched_attr::sched_flags additional flags that can influence
> > scheduling behaviour. Curren
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:20:29PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > If your could take another pass though your existing text, to incorporate
> > the
> > new flags stuff, and then send a page to me + linux-man@
> > that
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:20:29PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> If your could take another pass though your existing text, to incorporate the
> new flags stuff, and then send a page to me + linux-man@
> that would be great.
Sorry, this slipped my mind. An updated version below. Hea
26 matches
Mail list logo
