On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:08:59PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:40:20 +0200
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm se
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:08:59 +1000
Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:40:20 +0200
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm seei
On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:40:20 +0200
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
> > > out of a
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
> > out of a nohz idle. Looks like it's due to the taking a lot of remote
> > locks an
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
> out of a nohz idle. Looks like it's due to the taking a lot of remote
> locks and cache lines. irqoff trace:
On RT I think we default RT_RUNTIME_SHA
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 17:44 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>
> > My method of dealing with the throttle beast from hell for ~big box RT
> > is to stomp it flat during boot, as otherwise jitter is awful.
>
> How do you stomp it flat?
With a size 12 boot originally from SGI. Their extra hairy beas
On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:46:57 +0200
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 09:11 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
> > out of a nohz idle. Looks like it's due to the taking a lot of remote
> > locks and cac
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 09:11 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
> out of a nohz idle. Looks like it's due to the taking a lot of remote
> locks and cache lines. irqoff trace:
>
> latency: 407 us, #608/608, CPU#3 | (M:serv
Hi,
I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
out of a nohz idle. Looks like it's due to the taking a lot of remote
locks and cache lines. irqoff trace:
latency: 407 us, #608/608, CPU#3 | (M:server VP:0, KP:0, SP:0 HP:0 #P:176)
-0 3d...0us : decrementer_
9 matches
Mail list logo