Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 17:19 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 13-09-17 15:07:26, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: [...] > > The patch below has been used to fix the above issue by other distros > > - among them Redhat for the 3.10 kernel, so it should work for 3.16 as > > well. > > Thanks for the

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 17:19 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 13-09-17 15:07:26, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: [...] > > The patch below has been used to fix the above issue by other distros > > - among them Redhat for the 3.10 kernel, so it should work for 3.16 as > > well. > > Thanks for the

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Fri 15-09-17 18:12:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 10:59 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 13-09-17 18:58:13, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: > > [...] > > > The patch series look good to me. > > > > Thanks for double checking. Ben, could you merge this to 3.16 stable > > branch,

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Fri 15-09-17 18:12:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 10:59 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 13-09-17 18:58:13, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: > > [...] > > > The patch series look good to me. > > > > Thanks for double checking. Ben, could you merge this to 3.16 stable > > branch,

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 10:59 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 13-09-17 18:58:13, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: > [...] > > The patch series look good to me. > > Thanks for double checking. Ben, could you merge this to 3.16 stable > branch, please? I have a long list of requests to work through, but

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 10:59 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 13-09-17 18:58:13, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: > [...] > > The patch series look good to me. > > Thanks for double checking. Ben, could you merge this to 3.16 stable > branch, please? I have a long list of requests to work through, but

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Wed 13-09-17 18:58:13, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: [...] > The patch series look good to me. Thanks for double checking. Ben, could you merge this to 3.16 stable branch, please? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Wed 13-09-17 18:58:13, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: [...] > The patch series look good to me. Thanks for double checking. Ben, could you merge this to 3.16 stable branch, please? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 13-09-17 15:07:26, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: >> >>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel >>> >>>

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 13-09-17 15:07:26, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: >> >>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel >>> >>> BUG: scheduling while atomic:

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Wed 13-09-17 15:07:26, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: > > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > Hi, > > we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel > > > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x0100 > > Modules linked in:

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

On Wed 13-09-17 15:07:26, Jorgen S. Hansen wrote: > > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > Hi, > > we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel > > > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x0100 > > Modules linked in: veeamsnap(O) hmac cbc

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Hi, > we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x0100 > Modules linked in: veeamsnap(O) hmac cbc cts nfsv4 dns_resolver > rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd

Re: scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Hi, > we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x0100 > Modules linked in: veeamsnap(O) hmac cbc cts nfsv4 dns_resolver > rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd auth_rpcgss

scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

Hi, we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x0100 Modules linked in: veeamsnap(O) hmac cbc cts nfsv4 dns_resolver rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc vmw_vso$ CPU: 0 PID: 26771

scheduling while atomic from vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb in 3.16 kernels

Hi, we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x0100 Modules linked in: veeamsnap(O) hmac cbc cts nfsv4 dns_resolver rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc vmw_vso$ CPU: 0 PID: 26771