> +| > +WARN_ON(x op@p y) > +| > +WARN_ON_ONCE(x op@p y) > +|
Can it be nice to work with nested SmPL disjunctions so that a bit of duplicate SmPL code will be reduced? > +coccilib.org.print_todo(j0[0], msg) Will it be nicer to pass a string literal instead of a variable for the message as a method parameter? Regards, Markus