> +|
> +WARN_ON(x op@p y)
> +|
> +WARN_ON_ONCE(x op@p y)
> +|

Can it be nice to work with nested SmPL disjunctions so that a bit of
duplicate SmPL code will be reduced?


> +coccilib.org.print_todo(j0[0], msg)

Will it be nicer to pass a string literal instead of a variable for the message
as a method parameter?

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to