[OT] Re: shared memory problem

2001-07-03 Thread Erik Mouw
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:49:24AM -0600, Blesson Paul wrote: > I have some confusion regarding key in shmget(). Let I > have two shared memory variables. For the first one, I put key "99" and the > size is 1024. Next, I put key "199" for the second variable and size 1024. >

shared memory problem

2001-07-03 Thread Blesson Paul
hi I have some confusion regarding key in shmget(). Let I have two shared memory variables. For the first one, I put key "99" and the size is 1024. Next, I put key "199" for the second variable and size 1024. Will the two shared memory area overwrite each other. How can I

shared memory problem

2001-07-03 Thread Blesson Paul
hi I have some confusion regarding key in shmget(). Let I have two shared memory variables. For the first one, I put key 99 and the size is 1024. Next, I put key 199 for the second variable and size 1024. Will the two shared memory area overwrite each other. How can I

[OT] Re: shared memory problem

2001-07-03 Thread Erik Mouw
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:49:24AM -0600, Blesson Paul wrote: I have some confusion regarding key in shmget(). Let I have two shared memory variables. For the first one, I put key 99 and the size is 1024. Next, I put key 199 for the second variable and size 1024. Will

Re: shared memory problem

2001-02-13 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Admin, On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: > > I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was > 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared > memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone > said the stats have been

Re: shared memory problem

2001-02-13 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Admin, On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone said the stats have been broken

shared memory problem

2001-02-12 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone said the stats have been broken since sometime in 2.3, but my system also shows my swap being used up

shared memory problem

2001-02-12 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone said the stats have been broken since sometime in 2.3, but my system also shows my swap being used up