On Wed 2015-05-06 11:45:04, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:28:53AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > So please optimize ARM's _memc
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:28:53AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > So please optimize ARM's _memcpy_from
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:28:53AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > So please optimize ARM's _memcpy_fromio(), _memcpy_toio(), and
> > > _memset_io().
> > > That will
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > So please optimize ARM's _memcpy_fromio(), _memcpy_toio(), and _memset_io().
> > That will benefit other drivers on ARM, too.
>
> That's not going to happen.
>
> I've ha
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:46:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 24/04/15 16:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Fri 2015-04-10 12:35:52, Archit Taneja wrote:
> That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I thi
On Fri 2015-04-24 15:46:56, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 24/04/15 16:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Fri 2015-04-10 12:35:52, Archit Taneja wrote:
> That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I think
> a no
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 24/04/15 16:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Fri 2015-04-10 12:35:52, Archit Taneja wrote:
That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I think
a normal memcpy() for fb_memcpy_fromfb() should be fine...
>>>
>>> I
On 24/04/15 16:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri 2015-04-10 12:35:52, Archit Taneja wrote:
>>> That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I think
>>> a normal memcpy() for fb_memcpy_fromfb() should be fine...
>>
>> I didn't test for performance regressions when I posted
> > The difference is probably caused by memcpy() vs memcpy_fromio(). The
> > comment above memcpy_fromio() says "This needs to be optimized". I think
> > generally speaking memcpy_fromio() is correct for a framebuffer.
> >
> > That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I thi
Hi!
On Fri 2015-04-10 12:35:52, Archit Taneja wrote:
> >That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I think
> >a normal memcpy() for fb_memcpy_fromfb() should be fine...
>
> I didn't test for performance regressions when I posted this patch.
>
> A look at _memcpy_fromio in ar
On Thursday 09 April 2015 14:34:26 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 09/04/15 14:21, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> Hi Pavel,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I have an
On 09/04/15 14:21, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
in t
On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
>>> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>>>
>>> ro
On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
> > in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
> >
> > root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/n
On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 at 02:19:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
> > in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
> >
> > root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>
> root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
> real 0m 0.00s
> user 0m 0.00s
> sy
Hi!
I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real 0m 0.00s
user 0m 0.00s
sys0m 0.00s
on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown
17 matches
Mail list logo
