"Grover, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> - It's probably easier to put the "event" file in proc, instead of
> dev. This is what the acpi interface does, and eliminates the mknod
> step.
Is this kernel policy? I mean, you could apply the same argument to
all device nodes ;-)
> - per
[trimming CC's. Recommend [EMAIL PROTECTED] for followups]
As you mentioned, the ACPI driver does something similar, and I think the
approach is generally sound (or at least we haven't been able to come up
with anything better ;-) I do have the following comments:
- It's probably easier to put t
Here is a patch to deal with PM events (e.g. button presses) in a
system independent way. Could people with the applicable hardware test
out or comment on the changes?
The files affected are
arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
arch/mips/sgi/kernel/reset.c
arch/mips64/sgi-ip22/ip22
3 matches
Mail list logo
