Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check >> in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them. >> Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches? On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:59:50AM

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I'm using wli's 8k > >> stack + irq stack patches with good success though. > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 8 2007 16:18, David Chinner wrote: > >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:38:24PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:38:24PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current > >> kernels. I get hangs/oopes

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check >> in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them. >> Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches? On Mon, May 07, 2007

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them. Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches? On Mon, May 07, 2007 at

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:38:24PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current kernels. I get hangs/oopes after ~10mins

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 8 2007 16:18, David Chinner wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:38:24PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using wli's 8k stack + irq stack patches with good success though. On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them. Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches? On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:59:50AM

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current >> kernels. I get hangs/oopes after ~10mins of work. >> > > Sounds like this is new behaviour? > > I

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I'm using wli's 8k > >> stack + irq stack patches with good success though. > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm using wli's 8k >> stack + irq stack patches with good success though. On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > wlis are handy. I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches,

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Please enable 8k stacks before doing any other debugging things, see if > > that fixes it. > > I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current > kernels. I get

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andrew Morton wrote: > Please enable 8k stacks before doing any other debugging things, see if > that fixes it. I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current kernels. I get hangs/oopes after ~10mins of work. I'm using wli's 8k stack + irq stack patches with good success

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 08 May 2007 00:30:31 +0100 Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 08/05/07 00:23, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:58:36 +0100 > > Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I've just got this under mainline too now > >>

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Simon Arlott
On 08/05/07 00:23, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:58:36 +0100 Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've just got this under mainline too now (0ec54aa8af5e6faa346aa55a1ad15ee6c25bb42d 2007-05-05 22:08:06): [84567.084000] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pdflush/0xeff84acf/186

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:58:36 +0100 Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just got this under mainline too now > (0ec54aa8af5e6faa346aa55a1ad15ee6c25bb42d 2007-05-05 22:08:06): > > [84567.084000] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pdflush/0xeff84acf/186 > [84567.084000] INFO: lockdep is

sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Simon Arlott
On 06/05/07 21:54, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2007 21:36:32 +0100 Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Not sure exactly what's going on here, but it happened

sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Simon Arlott
On 06/05/07 21:54, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2007 21:36:32 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Not sure exactly what's going on here, but it happened with

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:58:36 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just got this under mainline too now (0ec54aa8af5e6faa346aa55a1ad15ee6c25bb42d 2007-05-05 22:08:06): [84567.084000] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pdflush/0xeff84acf/186 [84567.084000] INFO: lockdep is turned

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Simon Arlott
On 08/05/07 00:23, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:58:36 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just got this under mainline too now (0ec54aa8af5e6faa346aa55a1ad15ee6c25bb42d 2007-05-05 22:08:06): [84567.084000] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pdflush/0xeff84acf/186

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 08 May 2007 00:30:31 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 08/05/07 00:23, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:58:36 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just got this under mainline too now (0ec54aa8af5e6faa346aa55a1ad15ee6c25bb42d 2007-05-05

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andrew Morton wrote: Please enable 8k stacks before doing any other debugging things, see if that fixes it. I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current kernels. I get hangs/oopes after ~10mins of work. I'm using wli's 8k stack + irq stack patches with good success

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: Please enable 8k stacks before doing any other debugging things, see if that fixes it. I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current kernels. I get hangs/oopes

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using wli's 8k stack + irq stack patches with good success though. On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: wlis are handy. I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that XFS+lvm+4k stacks is completely unusable with current kernels. I get hangs/oopes after ~10mins of work. Sounds like this is new behaviour? I wonder why. Same

Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using wli's 8k stack + irq stack patches with good success though. On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew