Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-06 Thread Juraj Bednar
Hello, sorry, too stupid not to look on the web first, but this should really _NOT_ appear in the kernel source tree. I found that apm=power_off and make mrproper before build helps. Juraj. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-06 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 02.07 Juraj Bednar wrote: > Hello, > > > the same for vanilla 2.4.1 and 2.4.1ac3. Everything works ok until I turn > off SMP > support (which is required to make it possible to turn off the machine using > APM, since > ACPI is completely broken in 2.4.1 for me). > You do not need to do

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-06 Thread Juraj Bednar
Hello, the same for vanilla 2.4.1 and 2.4.1ac3. Everything works ok until I turn off SMP support (which is required to make it possible to turn off the machine using APM, since ACPI is completely broken in 2.4.1 for me). Juraj. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-06 Thread Juraj Bednar
Hello, the same for vanilla 2.4.1 and 2.4.1ac3. Everything works ok until I turn off SMP support (which is required to make it possible to turn off the machine using APM, since ACPI is completely broken in 2.4.1 for me). Juraj. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-06 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 02.07 Juraj Bednar wrote: Hello, the same for vanilla 2.4.1 and 2.4.1ac3. Everything works ok until I turn off SMP support (which is required to make it possible to turn off the machine using APM, since ACPI is completely broken in 2.4.1 for me). You do not need to do that.

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-06 Thread Juraj Bednar
Hello, sorry, too stupid not to look on the web first, but this should really _NOT_ appear in the kernel source tree. I found that apm=power_off and make mrproper before build helps. Juraj. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-05 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:06:58 -0500 , "Miller, Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have a problem that would have started out as "I can't compile my device >driver with 2.2.18". I was compiling my device driver for non-SMP while my >kernel (and thus /usr/src/linux) was SMP. So I looked at

smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-05 Thread Miller, Brendan
I have a problem that would have started out as "I can't compile my device driver with 2.2.18". I was compiling my device driver for non-SMP while my kernel (and thus /usr/src/linux) was SMP. So I looked at compiling the kernel for non-SMP so that my /usr/src/linux would be non-SMP and my

smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-05 Thread Miller, Brendan
I have a problem that would have started out as "I can't compile my device driver with 2.2.18". I was compiling my device driver for non-SMP while my kernel (and thus /usr/src/linux) was SMP. So I looked at compiling the kernel for non-SMP so that my /usr/src/linux would be non-SMP and my

Re: smp_num_cpus redefined? (compiling 2.2.18 for non-SMP?)

2001-02-05 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:06:58 -0500 , "Miller, Brendan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem that would have started out as "I can't compile my device driver with 2.2.18". I was compiling my device driver for non-SMP while my kernel (and thus /usr/src/linux) was SMP. So I looked at