On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:57:48PM +0100, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> On za, 2013-12-14 at 09:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
> > Frederik Himpe escreveu:
> >
> > > [My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to
> > > all
> > >
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:57:48PM +0100, Frederik Himpe wrote:
On za, 2013-12-14 at 09:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe fhi...@telenet.be escreveu:
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to
all
Off-topic, Cc:s dropped, related to DVB / V4L2 tuner communication problems.
On 17.12.2013 07:39, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hi Connor,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Connor Behan wrote:
Thanks for the detailed answer. I have tried your patch and updated the
wiki page. Would a 950 or 950Q
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> That shared DVB / V4L2 tuner is one problem that I have also currently (SDR
> is on V4L2 API and DTV is provided via DVB API). I have decided to try model
> where I separate RF tuner totally independent used DVB / V4L2 APIs, just to
>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi wrote:
That shared DVB / V4L2 tuner is one problem that I have also currently (SDR
is on V4L2 API and DTV is provided via DVB API). I have decided to try model
where I separate RF tuner totally independent used DVB / V4L2 APIs, just
Off-topic, Cc:s dropped, related to DVB / V4L2 tuner communication problems.
On 17.12.2013 07:39, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hi Connor,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the detailed answer. I have tried your patch and updated the
wiki page.
Hi Connor,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Connor Behan wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed answer. I have tried your patch and updated the
> wiki page. Would a 950 or 950Q be safer to buy next time?
The 950 has long since been obsoleted. You cannot buy them anymore.
The 950q though is well
Thanks for the detailed answer. I have tried your patch and updated the
wiki page. Would a 950 or 950Q be safer to buy next time?
On 14/12/13 05:17 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> I had a patch kicking around which fixed part of the issue, but it
> didn't completely work because of the lgdt3305
On za, 2013-12-14 at 09:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
> Frederik Himpe escreveu:
>
> > [My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
> > the relevant lists]
> >
> > Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3,
On za, 2013-12-14 at 09:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe fhi...@telenet.be escreveu:
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
the relevant lists]
Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to
Thanks for the detailed answer. I have tried your patch and updated the
wiki page. Would a 950 or 950Q be safer to buy next time?
On 14/12/13 05:17 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
I had a patch kicking around which fixed part of the issue, but it
didn't completely work because of the lgdt3305
Hi Connor,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Connor Behan connor.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the detailed answer. I have tried your patch and updated the
wiki page. Would a 950 or 950Q be safer to buy next time?
The 950 has long since been obsoleted. You cannot buy them anymore.
The
> My basic problem is
>
> __tda18271_write_regs: [1-0060|M] ERROR: idx = 0x0, len = 39, i2c_transfer
> returned: -32
>
> where it attaches lgdt3305 before tda18271. Do you know a similar patch
> that could help me?
It's a totally different issue. The problem with the US Exeter has to
do with
On 14/12/13 03:24 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
> Frederik Himpe escreveu:
>
>> [My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
>> the relevant lists]
>>
>> Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
>>
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe escreveu:
> [My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
> the relevant lists]
>
> Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
> nanoStick T2 290e does not work anymore.
>
> This happens
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe fhi...@telenet.be escreveu:
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
the relevant lists]
Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
nanoStick T2 290e does not work anymore.
This
On 14/12/13 03:24 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe fhi...@telenet.be escreveu:
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
the relevant lists]
Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV
My basic problem is
__tda18271_write_regs: [1-0060|M] ERROR: idx = 0x0, len = 39, i2c_transfer
returned: -32
where it attaches lgdt3305 before tda18271. Do you know a similar patch
that could help me?
It's a totally different issue. The problem with the US Exeter has to
do with the
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe escreveu:
> [My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
> the relevant lists]
>
> Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
> nanoStick T2 290e does not work anymore.
>
> This happens
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
the relevant lists]
Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
nanoStick T2 290e does not work anymore.
This happens with 3.12.3:
[3.778817] em28174 #0: i2c eeprom : 26 00 01 00 02 09
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
the relevant lists]
Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
nanoStick T2 290e does not work anymore.
This happens with 3.12.3:
[3.778817] em28174 #0: i2c eeprom : 26 00 01 00 02 09
Em Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:19:39 +0100
Frederik Himpe fhi...@telenet.be escreveu:
[My excuses for multiposting, it seems gmane does not permit posting to all
the relevant lists]
Since upgrading my system from Linux 3.12 to 3.12.3, my PCTV Systems
nanoStick T2 290e does not work anymore.
This
22 matches
Mail list logo
