Re: start___kallsyms missing from i386 vmlinux.lds ?

2001-01-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > Some sparc users have a slightly older version of gcc, built shortly > before 'weak' support was added, which required those symbols to be > defined. Dave Miller thought the compiler problem was widespread > enough to justify changing the source to suit t

Re: start___kallsyms missing from i386 vmlinux.lds ?

2001-01-02 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 04:39:39 -0500, Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens wrote: >> kernel/module.c defines >> extern const char __start___kallsyms[] __attribute__ ((weak)); >> extern const char __stop___kallsyms[] __attribute__ ((weak)); >> >> The symbols are weak and do not ne

Re: start___kallsyms missing from i386 vmlinux.lds ?

2001-01-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 01:56:08 -0500, > Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >--- linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds~ Fri Jul 7 03:47:07 2000 > >+++ linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.ldsMon Jan 1 07:55:50 2001 > >+ __start___kallsyms = .; /* All kernel symbols */ >

Re: start___kallsyms missing from i386 vmlinux.lds ?

2001-01-01 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 01:56:08 -0500, Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >--- linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds~ Fri Jul 7 03:47:07 2000 >+++ linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.ldsMon Jan 1 07:55:50 2001 >+ __start___kallsyms = .; /* All kernel symbols */ >+ __kallsyms : { *(__kallsyms)

start___kallsyms missing from i386 vmlinux.lds ?

2001-01-01 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Hi, I wasn't sure if this was overlooked or left out intentionally. Paul. --- linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds~Fri Jul 7 03:47:07 2000 +++ linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds Mon Jan 1 07:55:50 2001 @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ __ksymtab : { *(__ksymtab) } __stop___ksymtab = .; + __start___kallsyms