Hi!
> > > > > Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a
> > > > > separate
> > > > > patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not valid for
> > > > > all
> > > > > sub-devices attached to the ISP anymore. I think it originally was a
> > > > > separate patch,
Hi!
> > > static int isp_fwnode_parse(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle
> > > *fwn,
> > >
> > > struct isp_async_subdev *isd)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > - struct isp_bus_cfg *buscfg = &isd->bus;
> > > + struct isp_bus_cfg *buscfg;
> > >
> > > struct v4l2_fwno
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:39:51PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:16:17 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:07:27AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should b
Hi Sakari,
On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:16:17 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:07:27AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a
> > > separate patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not
> > > valid
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:58:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a
> > > > separate
> > > > patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not valid for
> > > > all
> > > > sub-devices attached to the
Hi!
> > > Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a separate
> > > patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not valid for all
> > > sub-devices attached to the ISP anymore. I think it originally was a
> > > separate patch, but they probably have been merged at
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:07:27AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a separate
> > patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not valid for all
> > sub-devices attached to the ISP anymore. I think it origi
Hi!
> Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a separate
> patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not valid for all
> sub-devices attached to the ISP anymore. I think it originally was a
> separate patch, but they probably have been merged at some point. I c
8 matches
Mail list logo