On 07/11/2017 09:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:43:39 -0700
Yes, indeed the bug is in Linus's tree. However, 'sparc' tree doesn't
have DMA API change (e.g. commit b02c2b0bfd7ae) yet that introduced
the panic.
You can simply
On 07/11/2017 09:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:43:39 -0700
Yes, indeed the bug is in Linus's tree. However, 'sparc' tree doesn't
have DMA API change (e.g. commit b02c2b0bfd7ae) yet that introduced
the panic.
You can simply make a note of this when
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:43:39 -0700
> Yes, indeed the bug is in Linus's tree. However, 'sparc' tree doesn't
> have DMA API change (e.g. commit b02c2b0bfd7ae) yet that introduced
> the panic.
You can simply make a note of this when you send the bug
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:43:39 -0700
> Yes, indeed the bug is in Linus's tree. However, 'sparc' tree doesn't
> have DMA API change (e.g. commit b02c2b0bfd7ae) yet that introduced
> the panic.
You can simply make a note of this when you send the bug fix to me.
On 07/11/2017 05:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:38:21 -0700
On 07/11/2017 02:48 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000,
On 07/11/2017 05:34 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:38:21 -0700
On 07/11/2017 02:48 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:38:21 -0700
>
>
> On 07/11/2017 02:48 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>> I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
>>> works
>>> fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it
From: Meelis Roos
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:48:07 +0300 (EEST)
> Why sparc-next - it should go into 4.13 since 4.13 would break all
> niagara1 and niagara2 systems otherwise?
Absoultely, positively, correct.
From: Tushar Dave
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:38:21 -0700
>
>
> On 07/11/2017 02:48 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>> I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
>>> works
>>> fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
>>> on boot with
From: Meelis Roos
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:48:07 +0300 (EEST)
> Why sparc-next - it should go into 4.13 since 4.13 would break all
> niagara1 and niagara2 systems otherwise?
Absoultely, positively, correct.
On 07/11/2017 02:48 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are
sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older
On 07/11/2017 02:48 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are
sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older
> > > > > I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
> > > > > works
> > > > > fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
> > > > > on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are
> > > > > sun4v
> > > > > physical machines, not
> > > > > I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge
> > > > > works
> > > > > fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
> > > > > on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are
> > > > > sun4v
> > > > > physical machines, not
On 07/10/2017 10:05 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older
On 07/10/2017 10:05 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older
> > > I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
> > > fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
> > > on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
> > > physical machines, not VM-s. Older sun4 machines do not
> > > I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
> > > fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
> > > on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
> > > physical machines, not VM-s. Older sun4 machines do not
On 07/10/2017 11:47 AM, tndave wrote:
On 07/10/2017 06:20 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are
On 07/10/2017 11:47 AM, tndave wrote:
On 07/10/2017 06:20 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are
On 07/10/2017 06:20 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older
On 07/10/2017 06:20 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older sun4 machines do not exhibit this
problem.
I tested yesterdayd 4.12+git on sparc64 to see if the sparc merge works
fine, and on all of my sun4v machines (T1000, T2000, T5120) it crashed
on boot with DMA-related stacktrace (below). Allt he machines are sun4v
physical machines, not VM-s. Older sun4 machines do not exhibit this
problem.
24 matches
Mail list logo