I'm using stg on top of git for merging and easy tree rebasing, but the
version might be old (I'll try upgrade at first):
Stacked GIT 0.12
git version 1.5.0.3
stg import / refresh / pick commands are on way to move patches to linus
with stgit, you should add stg clean on your workflow. This wi
On 17/10/2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > I'm using stg on top of git for merging and easy tree rebasing, but the
> > version might be old (I'll try upgrade at first):
>
> Ahh. That may explain it. stg may well be using the low-level
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
>
> I'm using stg on top of git for merging and easy tree rebasing, but the
> version might be old (I'll try upgrade at first):
Ahh. That may explain it. stg may well be using the low-level git internal
commands (which *do* allow you to create any k
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> >
> > I didn't notice, too. I've fixed this commit in my git tree.
>
> More importantly, how did it get there in the first place?
>
> As mentioned, normal git tools will not even *allow* you to create an
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
>
> I didn't notice, too. I've fixed this commit in my git tree.
More importantly, how did it get there in the first place?
As mentioned, normal git tools will not even *allow* you to create an
empty commit by default! So you must be using some real
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > While scanning over today's updates in Linus's tree, I noticed
> > the following commit has no changes, and this does not appear
> > to be intentional.
>
> Interesting. You're right, I didn't notice.
I
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
> Git shouldn't even allow such commits to be generated, although you can
> force it by using the low-level functionality (eg using "git commit-tree"
> directly for doing things like importing)
That would be us
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> While scanning over today's updates in Linus's tree, I noticed
> the following commit has no changes, and this does not appear
> to be intentional.
Interesting. You're right, I didn't notice.
Git shouldn't even allow such commits to be generated, al
While scanning over today's updates in Linus's tree, I noticed
the following commit has no changes, and this does not appear
to be intentional.
Someone should check it out.
commit e31b6656a81d6332cdf6af17d38a0573128a6aac
Author: Krzysztof Helt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Oct 16 14:54:58 2007
9 matches
Mail list logo