On Thursday 18 October 2007 16:16, Andrew A. Razdolsky wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In attachments i did pick all info i know about this failure.
Hi,
Does this actually cause problems for your system? Occasional
page allocation failures from interrupt context are expected.
If you are getting a lot of the
xt_TCPMSS xt_tcpudp iptable_nat
nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nfnetlink iptable_filter ip_tables
x_tables sch_sfq ip_gre nfsd exportfs lockd sunrpc r8168proxy kernel: swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
proxy kernel:
proxy kernel: Call Trace:
proxy kernel
PROTECTED]
/snap
Sep 13 02:56:52 ms249-lin-005 -- MARK --
Sep 13 03:06:23 ms249-lin-005 kernel: swapper: page allocation failure.
order:1, mode:0x20
Sep 13 03:06:23 ms249-lin-005 kernel: []
__alloc_pages+0x283/0x294
Sep 13 03:06:23 ms249-lin-005 kernel: []
cache_alloc_refill+0x27e/0x48d
Sep 13 03:0
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:10, Robert Hancock wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
Essentially the tg3 Ethernet driver is trying to allocate memory to
store a received packet, and is unable to do so. Since this is done
inside interrupt context, this allocation has to be serviced
First a (dumb) question, what does 'page allocation failure' really
mean? Is it some out of memory case?
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel: swapper: page allocation failure.
order:1, mode:0x20
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel:
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel: Call Trace:
{__
Hi.
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:10, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Essentially the tg3 Ethernet driver is trying to allocate memory to
> store a received packet, and is unable to do so. Since this is done
> inside interrupt context, this allocation has to be serviced from
> physic
(dumb) question, what does 'page allocation failure' really mean?
Is it some out of memory case?
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel: swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel:
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel: Call Trace: {__alloc_pages+878} {__get_
Hello Benjamin,
On Monday 28 February 2005 16:23, Benjamin L. Shi wrote:
> We've seen these, by adding the following tueables resolved the problem.
> More specifically, the lower zone protection made the difference.
>
> vm.vfs_cache_pressure=1000
> vm.lower_zone_protection=100
> vm.max_map_count =
We've seen these, by adding the following tueables resolved the problem.
More specifically, the lower zone protection made the difference.
vm.vfs_cache_pressure=1000
vm.lower_zone_protection=100
vm.max_map_count = 32668
vm.min_free_kbytes = 1
Bernd Schubert wrote:
Oh no, not this page allocat
the messages will not come
again. Could it be a kernel bug???
dmesg:
swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
Call Trace: {__alloc_pages+1135}
{__get_free_pages+16}
{kmem_getpages+38}
{tcp_v4_route_req+250}
{cache_alloc_refill+665}
{kmem_cache_alloc+54}
{sk_alloc+58
does 'page allocation failure' really mean?
Is it some out of memory case?
Thanks a lot in advance for any help,
Bernd
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel: swapper: page allocation failure. order:1,
mode:0x20
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel:
Feb 28 10:04:45 hitchcock kernel:
11 matches
Mail list logo
