Hi!
> It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
> precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
Yes, and that's okay.
What happens to devices during swsusp? They seem to be resumed
during system suspend?
A: That's correct. We need to resume them if
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 22:17, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
> >>precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
>
>>It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
>>precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
>>
>>
>
>Yes, it does. By design.
>
>
>
That seems
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
> precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
Yes, it does. By design.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought
It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
The problem is in swsusp_suspend(). It is designed as if
swsusp_arch_suspend() would suspend the hardware, when in fact all it
does is prepare for a suspend. The
It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
The problem is in swsusp_suspend(). It is designed as if
swsusp_arch_suspend() would suspend the hardware, when in fact all it
does is prepare for a suspend. The
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
Yes, it does. By design.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
Yes, it does. By design.
That seems counter-productive, so
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 22:17, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
Hi!
It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more
precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine.
Yes, and that's okay.
What happens to devices during swsusp? They seem to be resumed
during system suspend?
A: That's correct. We need to resume them if we
10 matches
Mail list logo