Hi!
> > > > > Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
> > > > > modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
> > > > > work if you do.
> > > >
> > > > this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming.
> > > > does it also apply to suspending?
> > >
Hi!
> > > > Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
> > > > modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
> > > > work if you do.
> > >
> > > this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming.
> > > does it also apply to suspending?
> >
> > As kernel
Hi Martin.
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:22, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Pavel Machek
> > > > Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
> > > > modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
> > > > work if you do.
> > >
> > > this makes perfect sense to me
also sprach Pavel Machek
> > > Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
> > > modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
> > > work if you do.
> >
> > this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming.
> > does it also apply to suspending?
>
> As
also sprach Pavel Machek pavel () ucw ! cz
Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming.
does it also apply to suspending?
As
Hi Martin.
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:22, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Pavel Machek pavel () ucw ! cz
Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me
Hi!
Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming.
does it also apply to suspending?
As kernel is the same for suspend
Hi!
Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any
modules from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't
work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming.
does it also apply to suspending?
As kernel is the same for
also sprach Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.28.1533 +0100]:
> Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any modules
> from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming. does it
also apply
Hi!
> also sprach Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.28.1533 +0100]:
> > Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any modules
> > from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't work if you do.
>
> this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming. does
On Monday, 28 of February 2005 14:56, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.27.1843 +0100]:
> > Please check my first post, if you have the time:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=110789536921510=2
>
> There is also
>
>
Hi!
On Po 28-02-05 14:56:04, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.27.1843 +0100]:
> > Please check my first post, if you have the time:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=110789536921510=2
>
> There is also
>
>
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.27.1843 +0100]:
> Please check my first post, if you have the time:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=110789536921510=2
There is also
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/12540
with the same conclusion.
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.27.1843 +0100]:
Please check my first post, if you have the time:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=110789536921510w=2
There is also
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/12540
with the same conclusion.
Maybe
Hi!
On Po 28-02-05 14:56:04, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.27.1843 +0100]:
Please check my first post, if you have the time:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=110789536921510w=2
There is also
On Monday, 28 of February 2005 14:56, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.27.1843 +0100]:
Please check my first post, if you have the time:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=110789536921510w=2
There is also
Hi!
also sprach Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.28.1533 +0100]:
Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any modules
from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming. does it
also
also sprach Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.28.1533 +0100]:
Could you, please, verify that you don't need to load any modules
from initrd for your swap partition to work? It won't work if you do.
this makes perfect sense to me when you talk about resuming. does it
also apply to
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:27:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 of February 2005 18:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
[snip]
> > Ok, this one.
> >
> > I do not know what is going wrong. swsusp seems to work for
> > people... or at least it works for me. Here's my .config, perhaps you
> >
On Sunday, 27 of February 2005 18:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Ugh, too late, I already forgot what went wrong for you. Anyway
> > > try reading Documentation/power/swsusp.txt and/or going to
> > > 2.6.11-rc4. If that does not help, debug with printk :-).
> >
> > I already did the first
also sprach Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.27.1804 +0100]:
> Ugh, too late, I already forgot what went wrong for you. Anyway
> try reading Documentation/power/swsusp.txt and/or going to
> 2.6.11-rc4. If that does not help, debug with printk :-).
I already did the first two. I will try
Hi!
> > Ugh, too late, I already forgot what went wrong for you. Anyway
> > try reading Documentation/power/swsusp.txt and/or going to
> > 2.6.11-rc4. If that does not help, debug with printk :-).
>
> I already did the first two. I will try 2.6.11-rc4 now.
>
> Please check my first post, if you
Hi!
> Sorry for the late reply, I've been strung up with work. I tried
> your suggestion on another machine, with a vanilla 2.6.10 kernel and
> a single swap device, twice the size of the physical RAM; I get
> exactly the same result. The swap device cannot be found.
>
> What to try next?
Ugh,
Sorry for the late reply, I've been strung up with work. I tried
your suggestion on another machine, with a vanilla 2.6.10 kernel and
a single swap device, twice the size of the physical RAM; I get
exactly the same result. The swap device cannot be found.
What to try next?
--
martin;
Sorry for the late reply, I've been strung up with work. I tried
your suggestion on another machine, with a vanilla 2.6.10 kernel and
a single swap device, twice the size of the physical RAM; I get
exactly the same result. The swap device cannot be found.
What to try next?
--
martin;
Hi!
Sorry for the late reply, I've been strung up with work. I tried
your suggestion on another machine, with a vanilla 2.6.10 kernel and
a single swap device, twice the size of the physical RAM; I get
exactly the same result. The swap device cannot be found.
What to try next?
Ugh, too
Hi!
Ugh, too late, I already forgot what went wrong for you. Anyway
try reading Documentation/power/swsusp.txt and/or going to
2.6.11-rc4. If that does not help, debug with printk :-).
I already did the first two. I will try 2.6.11-rc4 now.
Please check my first post, if you have the
also sprach Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.27.1804 +0100]:
Ugh, too late, I already forgot what went wrong for you. Anyway
try reading Documentation/power/swsusp.txt and/or going to
2.6.11-rc4. If that does not help, debug with printk :-).
I already did the first two. I will try
On Sunday, 27 of February 2005 18:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Ugh, too late, I already forgot what went wrong for you. Anyway
try reading Documentation/power/swsusp.txt and/or going to
2.6.11-rc4. If that does not help, debug with printk :-).
I already did the first two. I will
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:27:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 27 of February 2005 18:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
[snip]
Ok, this one.
I do not know what is going wrong. swsusp seems to work for
people... or at least it works for me. Here's my .config, perhaps you
have
Hi!
> I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
> (2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
> and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
> Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
> I enter swsusp mode,
Hi!
I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
(2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
I enter swsusp mode, the
I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
(2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
I enter swsusp mode, the kernel
I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
(2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
I enter swsusp mode, the kernel
34 matches
Mail list logo
