On 01/25, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >> Btw task_is_descendant() looks wrong at first glance.
> >
> > No, I missed the 2nd ->group_leader dereference. Still this function looks
> >
On 01/25, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >> Btw task_is_descendant() looks wrong at first glance.
> >
> > No, I missed the 2nd ->group_leader dereference. Still this function looks
> > overcomplicated and the
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> Btw task_is_descendant() looks wrong at first glance.
>
> No, I missed the 2nd ->group_leader dereference. Still this function looks
> overcomplicated and the usage of
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> Btw task_is_descendant() looks wrong at first glance.
>
> No, I missed the 2nd ->group_leader dereference. Still this function looks
> overcomplicated and the usage of thread_group_leader/group_leader
On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Btw task_is_descendant() looks wrong at first glance.
No, I missed the 2nd ->group_leader dereference. Still this function looks
overcomplicated and the usage of thread_group_leader/group_leader just add
the unnecessary confusion. It can be simplified a little
On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Btw task_is_descendant() looks wrong at first glance.
No, I missed the 2nd ->group_leader dereference. Still this function looks
overcomplicated and the usage of thread_group_leader/group_leader just add
the unnecessary confusion. It can be simplified a little
6 matches
Mail list logo