Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Frank Jacobberger
Tony Hoyle wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line > > Me too.. > > make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/drm' > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: > > I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line Me too.. make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/drm' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Alan Cox
> make 3.79.1 Ditto > gcc 2.95.2 2220 gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) and I really can't see that being relevant > ld 2.10.91 GNU ld version 2.10.90 (with BFD 2.10.0.18) > modversions 2.3.23 insmod version 2.3.21 I see modversions.h being included properly on the command

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Possibly something in the auto-dependencies? Unfortunately I don't have > > the info files for gcc so > > I can't work out why the '-include' directive would be > > overridden/ignored. > > Im wondering if it is make dependant. It seems to be working here Well I'm on:

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Alan Cox
> Possibly something in the auto-dependencies? Unfortunately I don't have > the info files for gcc so > I can't work out why the '-include' directive would be > overridden/ignored. Im wondering if it is make dependant. It seems to be working here - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Tony Hoyle wrote: > modversions.h is being included in the 'gcc' line, however something is > overriding it > in the case of the agpsupport.c file. If you move the include > to > the top of agpsupport.c it also works correctly. OK ignore the above putting it in agpsupport doesn't fix it.

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: > Wrong patch. Modversions.h should be getting automatically included. That > is what needs fixing. You've nicely located the problem and fixed the symptoms > for the module versioned case > modversions.h is being included in the 'gcc' line, however something is overriding it in

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: Wrong patch. Modversions.h should be getting automatically included. That is what needs fixing. You've nicely located the problem and fixed the symptoms for the module versioned case modversions.h is being included in the 'gcc' line, however something is overriding it in the

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Tony Hoyle wrote: modversions.h is being included in the 'gcc' line, however something is overriding it in the case of the agpsupport.c file. If you move the include linux/modversions.h to the top of agpsupport.c it also works correctly. OK ignore the above putting it in agpsupport

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Alan Cox
Possibly something in the auto-dependencies? Unfortunately I don't have the info files for gcc so I can't work out why the '-include' directive would be overridden/ignored. Im wondering if it is make dependant. It seems to be working here - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: Possibly something in the auto-dependencies? Unfortunately I don't have the info files for gcc so I can't work out why the '-include' directive would be overridden/ignored. Im wondering if it is make dependant. It seems to be working here Well I'm on: make 3.79.1

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Alan Cox
make 3.79.1 Ditto gcc 2.95.2 2220 gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) and I really can't see that being relevant ld 2.10.91 GNU ld version 2.10.90 (with BFD 2.10.0.18) modversions 2.3.23 insmod version 2.3.21 I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line Me too.. make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/drm' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Frank Jacobberger
Tony Hoyle wrote: Alan Cox wrote: I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line Me too.. make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/drm' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread Frank Jacobberger
Alan Cox wrote: > > > +#include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > > I just want to confirm that this small fix solves my drm > > problems as well - currently running -test13-pre7 > > > > Er, has anybody sent a patch to the maintainers? > > Wrong patch. Modversions.h

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread Alan Cox
> > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > I just want to confirm that this small fix solves my drm > problems as well - currently running -test13-pre7 > > Er, has anybody sent a patch to the maintainers? Wrong patch. Modversions.h should be getting automatically

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread J Sloan
Dieter Nützel wrote: > It haven't loaded since test13-pre1 for me. > Only the 'module version' was broken. > Last test12-pre7 was fine, here. > It was introduced with the Makefile cleanups. > > --- linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.oldThu Dec 28 16:27:34 2000 > +++

Re: modutils 2.3.23 fails with tdfx.o with test13-pre6

2000-12-30 Thread Ed Tomlinson
; and did a insmod -S tdfx.o and got the following : > > BTW - test13-pre6 here > > tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range > tdfx.o: unresolved symbol __wake_up > tdfx.o: unresolved symbol mtrr_add > tdfx.o: unresolved symbol __generic_copy_from_user > tdfx.o: unresolved sym

modutils 2.3.23 fails with tdfx.o with test13-pre6

2000-12-30 Thread Frank Jacobberger
I can't get the latest modutils to work with loading tdfx.o... Even went to the directory where tdfx.o resides and did a insmod -S tdfx.o and got the following : BTW - test13-pre6 here tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range tdfx.o: unresolved symbol __wake_up tdfx.o: unresolved symbol

modutils 2.3.23 fails with tdfx.o with test13-pre6

2000-12-30 Thread Frank Jacobberger
I can't get the latest modutils to work with loading tdfx.o... Even went to the directory where tdfx.o resides and did a insmod -S tdfx.o and got the following : BTW - test13-pre6 here tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range tdfx.o: unresolved symbol __wake_up tdfx.o: unresolved symbol

Re: modutils 2.3.23 fails with tdfx.o with test13-pre6

2000-12-30 Thread Ed Tomlinson
to work with loading tdfx.o... Even went to the directory where tdfx.o resides and did a insmod -S tdfx.o and got the following : BTW - test13-pre6 here tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range tdfx.o: unresolved symbol __wake_up tdfx.o: unresolved symbol mtrr_add tdfx.o: unresolved symbol

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread J Sloan
Dieter Nützel wrote: It haven't loaded since test13-pre1 for me. Only the 'module version' was broken. Last test12-pre7 was fine, here. It was introduced with the Makefile cleanups. --- linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.oldThu Dec 28 16:27:34 2000 +++ linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.h

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread Frank Jacobberger
Alan Cox wrote: +#include linux/modversions.h #include linux/module.h #include linux/kernel.h #include linux/miscdevice.h I just want to confirm that this small fix solves my drm problems as well - currently running -test13-pre7 Er, has anybody sent a patch to the