On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, David Dyck wrote:
> >
> > > I am getting a repeatable oops during the boot up phase,
> > > with linux 2.4.0 test10-pre4
>
> I know what your problem is now:
>
> > > Gnu C 2.7.2.3
>
> GCC 2.7.2.3 miscompiles the ker
i get the following when trying to compile netfilter:
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o fs.o filesystems.o open.o read_write.o
devices.o file_table.o buffer.o super.o block_dev.o stat.o exec.o
pipe.o namei.o fcntl.o ioctl.o readdir.o select.o fifo.o locks.o
dcache.o inode.o attr.o bad_inode.o file.o iobuf.o
d has the IronGate and the Viper
chipsets, and test10-pre5 works great on it.
One possible caveats :
- USB doesn't work too well, because of a bug in the Viper USB controller. You may
want to try to disable "PnP aware OS" in the bios. You may also try to download the
latest rev of the
Perhaps this is related to the PCI issues that are being debated on the list now.
Would someone look at my bus configuration and let me know what to test or what patch
to apply to get my kernel booting?
lspci -vv reports:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-751 [Irongate] Syst
f Before first symbol
f: 68 a9 09 1d c0push $0xc01d09a9
1 error issued. Results may not be reliable.
test10-pre5 oops:
--
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Robert Lynch wrote:
> Oct 19 13:00:23 ives kernel: EIP:0010:[try_to_swap_out+252/796]
Those Oopsen look like they're from test10-pre4 (fixed in pre5). Also,
please include the lines beginning with "kernel BUG at...".
-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10/ (specified)
-m /usr/src/linux/System.map (default)
Error (regular_file): read_system_map stat /usr/src/linux/System.map failed
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> make oldconfig clean dep all install modules modules_install
> Makefiles are puzzling, sometimes.
make dep does something that's basically equivalent to changing
the Makefiles. However, make doesn't re-read them, so all the
targets after "dep" will be
I am attempting to build everything as modules.
I can compile the works, but depmod -ae gives
loads of errors. Are these bugs or user error?
Thanks,
Miles
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.0-test10/kernel/drivers/block/DAC960.o
depmod: devfs_unregister_blkdev
d
On Wed, Oct 25 2000, Tom Holroyd wrote:
> Alpha DP264 UP.
>
> Doing a dump to a SCSI MO disk (aic7xxx, Fujitsu Gigamo, ro ext2 fs), and
> simultaneously writing a megabyte to a floppy (tar -cf /dev/fd0, "FDC 0 is
> a post-1991 82077") produced a ten second freeze. I did this twice and
> it's rep
Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
> System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
>
> 2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
> when running 'mount -o remount
I see similar messages. The system Oop's when trying to mount /proc during
boot. Have latest mount / modutils etc. This is 2.4.0-test10-pre5
=
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 08059000
printin
Hi,
i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
when running 'mount -o remount,rw /' during boot.
It also complains that /proc isn't
torvalds wrote
>It seems that gcc-2.7.2.3 is terminally ill. I'd rather change
>Documentation/Changes, and just document the fact.
>These kinds of subtle work-arounds for gcc bugs are not really acceptable,
>nor is it worthwhile complaining when somebody does development with a gcc
>that is _n
of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
diff -u -r linux-2.4.0-test10-pre5/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c
linux/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c
--- linux-2.4.0-test10-pre5/arch/alpha/kernel/time.cFri Sep 22 14:09:00 2000
+++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Brian Gerst wrote:
> David Dyck wrote:
> >
> > > I am getting a repeatable oops during the boot up phase,
> > > with linux 2.4.0 test10-pre4
> >
> > I'm seeing the same oops with test10-pre5.
> > I don't g
David Dyck wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, David Dyck wrote:
>
> > I am getting a repeatable oops during the boot up phase,
> > with linux 2.4.0 test10-pre4
>
> I'm seeing the same oops with test10-pre5.
> I don't get the error with 2.4.0-
Alpha DP264 UP.
Doing a dump to a SCSI MO disk (aic7xxx, Fujitsu Gigamo, ro ext2 fs), and
simultaneously writing a megabyte to a floppy (tar -cf /dev/fd0, "FDC 0 is
a post-1991 82077") produced a ten second freeze. I did this twice and
it's reproducible. The system froze including the mouse and
James Simmons wrote:
>> I had this option in my .config:
>>
>> CONFIG_FB_RIVA=m
>>
>> Changing that option to:
>>
>> # CONFIG_FB_RIVA is not set
>>
>> made the errors stop occuring. I am not sure
>> why building the Riva support as a module would
>> cause the errors to be generated
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, David Dyck wrote:
> I am getting a repeatable oops during the boot up phase,
> with linux 2.4.0 test10-pre4
I'm seeing the same oops with test10-pre5.
I don't get the error with 2.4.0-test9.
> Even a simple "mount /proc" command yield
> I had this option in my .config:
>
> CONFIG_FB_RIVA=m
>
> Changing that option to:
>
> # CONFIG_FB_RIVA is not set
>
> made the errors stop occuring. I am not sure
> why building the Riva support as a module would
> cause the errors to be generated.
Did this. No problem. The o
False alarm.
Rechecked my .config - it was strange
And remembered that I did a clean start...
Wrong config file - sorry...
/RogerL
Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> Roger Larsson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the first test kernel that won't boot
> > for me.
> > Last message "Ok, booting the kernel"
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Miles Lane wrote:
>
>
>> James, I tried something even more drastic than running
>> make mrproper. I blew away my old source tree, untarred
>> a test9 tree, patched it to test10-pre5, copied my old .config
>> file into it, ran make old
Hi,
This is the first test kernel that won't boot
for me.
Last message "Ok, booting the kernel"
Then nothing...
PPro 180
96MB
440FX chip set
Saw something about PCI initializations earlier
on the list...
/RogerL
--
Home page:
http://www.norran.net/nra02596/
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Miles Lane wrote:
> James, I tried something even more drastic than running
> make mrproper. I blew away my old source tree, untarred
> a test9 tree, patched it to test10-pre5, copied my old .config
> file into it, ran make oldconfig menuconfig dep all insta
than running
make mrproper. I blew away my old source tree, untarred
a test9 tree, patched it to test10-pre5, copied my old .config
file into it, ran make oldconfig menuconfig dep all install
modules modules_install. When I ran menuconfig, I set the
options as a mentioned in my fir
> I am experimenting with compiling lots of stuff as modules.
> I hit what is either a user error, a configuration script
> bug or a symbol export bug.
I just tried your setup and it worked for me. Try a make mrproper and then
a make dep etc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
this worked! thanks a lot Mikael! you have any idea why this change was
made and if the maintainer of pcmcia needs to be notified?? just curious,
i'm sure someone else will run into this sooner or later...thanks again!
Jason
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > i've had problem
> i've had problems compiling pcmcia support in the last 2 pre releases of
>the test10 kernel, pre4 and pre5. i'm using pcmcia-cs-3.1.21, which last
>time i checked was the latest version of the pcmcia package source.
I'm using this patch.
/Mikael
--- pcmcia-cs-3.1.21/Configure.~1~ Thu A
hello,
i've had problems compiling pcmcia support in the last 2 pre releases of
the test10 kernel, pre4 and pre5. i'm using pcmcia-cs-3.1.21, which last
time i checked was the latest version of the pcmcia package source.
In file included from ../include/linux/netdevice.h:29,
f
Helge,
It doesn't need to be there (in x25.h) but x25 is compiling if
you hit this. Methinks your config.h didn't build correct...
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Compiling stops with:
>
> make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux/include/net/x25call.h',
> needed by `/usr/s
Compiling stops with:
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux/include/net/x25call.h',
needed by `/usr/src/linux/include/net/x25.h'. Stop.
I don't have x25 configured.
Looks like this file is removed by the patch, and lots of
references to it is removed. I guess x25.h is wrong in tryi
I am experimenting with compiling lots of stuff as modules.
I hit what is either a user error, a configuration script
bug or a symbol export bug.
ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext
arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
Ok, the issue with Petr is still open, in the meantime the test10-pre5
stuff fixes various other small nagging issues (notably the silly
extraneous BUG() tests that bit lots of people - sorry).
Linus
-
- pre5:
- Mikael Pettersson: more Pentium IV cleanup.
- David
34 matches
Mail list logo
