> I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't
> realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I
> decided that it's not worth it.
Ok. Not a problem. I'll leave it until post 2.4.0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't
> realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I
> decided that it's not worth it.
Umm... Linus, how about a bunch of fixes I've sent to you several times
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures
> > to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I
> > actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of
> > bugs ;).
>
> So you want
> Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures
> to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I
> actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of
> bugs ;).
So you want drivers/gsc again ? I assumed you dropped it as you
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to
> > the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point
> > I'll make a pre2 that is worth anno
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to
> the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point
> I'll make a pre2 that is worth announcing.
Does this mean other arches will have a c
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
> > > timer handling makes it limp along).
> >
> > Possibly related datapoint: aft
* Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
> > timer handling makes it limp along).
>
> Possibly related datapoint: after several days of uptime, my
> 2.4.0-test10pre? machin
On 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> if we figure out why apparently some people have trouble with external
> modules (at least one person has trouble with loading alsa modules).
I cannot load the xircom_tulip_cb module using the latest modutils 2.3.22.
I think it's a modutils problem.
Pau
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
> > machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> > everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
> > timer handling makes it limp along).
>
> Hmm, it's happening on all interfaces.
Ok, never mind me then. It's not an
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > This go around I compiled everything into the kernel, actually.
> > If it would be useful I can compile them as modules reboot and then see
> > what happens...
>
> Even when compiled into th
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
> > machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> > everything going through my firewall (set up using ipta
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> This go around I compiled everything into the kernel, actually.
> If it would be useful I can compile them as modules reboot and then see
> what happens...
Even when compiled into the kernel, you might just ifdown/ifup the device.
That will r
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> > everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
> > 100ms time added on to pings and traceroutes. I'll probably reboot the
> > machine tonight and see if that h
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
> machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
> 100ms time added on to pings and tra
> machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
> 100ms time added on to pings and traceroutes. I'll probably reboot the
> machine tonight and see if that helps.
Before you do that can you see if ifcon
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Especially if we get that netfilter problem sorted out (see the other
> thread about the IP fragmentation issues associated with that one), and
> if we figure out why apparently some people have trouble with external
> modules (at least one person h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
>changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
The test13-pre1 changes are almost exclusively a radical Makefile
cleanup, and it's bee
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
>
> > Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
> > changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
> >
>
> I musta missed the post too... But then again I went
The test13-pre1 changelog was something along the lines of "alright, I
am sick of this Makefile crap. I fixed some, clean up the rest."
;-)
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | These are not the J's you're lookin' for.
MandrakeSoft| It'
Hello,
Linus didn't annnounce test13-pre1 as far as I am aware of.
Regards,
Frank
--On Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:11 PM -0800 "Dr. Kelsey Hudson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
>
>> Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
>> ch
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
> Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
> changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
>
I musta missed the post too... But then again I went back and looked for
it and couldnt find it so...
i'd like t
Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
--
"Windows for Dummies? Isn't that redundant?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
24 matches
Mail list logo
