On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
> Someone has sent a dodgy message to bugtraq. Delete
> the mailbox or open it in an editor and look for the
> header line that's a lot longer than the others.
>
that wasn't enough for me. i ended up deleting most of the emails to
bugtraq from sep 1
Thanks! I really should read every single letter on BUGTRAQ, not
on linux-kernel ;)
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote:
>
> Readers of BUGTRAQ probably have already seen the message indicating
> some of us have been seeing library problems, not fs corruption. At
> least those of us with pr
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > > On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote:
> > >
> > > > Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post
> > > > showed up here.
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at
> > >
> > > weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bugtraq
> > > folder.
> >
> > Ohh, so I'm not the only one having trouble reading bugtraq
> > la
RvR> Ohh, so I'm not the only one having trouble reading bugtraq
RvR> lately? ;)
Yep. And to make things even more (or less?) confusing: it's happening to me
too but on _SOLARIS_, not Linux!!!
I'm just now checking my mailbox for a offending letter as I suspect a pine
bug. mutt is fine.
--
Mee
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post
> > > > showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at
> > >
> > > weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bugtraq
> > > fold
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote:
> >
> > > Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post
> > > showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at
> >
> > weird
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote:
>
> > Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post
> > showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at
>
> weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bug
Em Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 09:07:10PM -0400, Mohammad A. Haque escreveu:
> When pine crashed on me while trying to read one of my mailboxes I ended
> up opening the mailbox in vi. vi complained about Incomplete line and
> sure enough .. at the end of the file was lots of gibberish.
>
> This wasn't m
When pine crashed on me while trying to read one of my mailboxes I ended
up opening the mailbox in vi. vi complained about Incomplete line and
sure enough .. at the end of the file was lots of gibberish.
This wasn't my bugtraq mailbox so I'm thinking it's just plain
coincidence that the linux-tru
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote:
> Odd. I started seeing mailbox corruption the day before the first post
> showed up here. Since it was only one list (BUGTRAQ) and I'm still at
weird. currently my pine crashes on me when i close my bugtraq
folder.
however, i don't think i have fs cor
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 01:58:02PM -0400, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> I think I saw one other person mention fs corruption with test8-pre2.
> What is your system configuration? I'm pretty sure it's not a ide
> controller/hd problem because my inbox is on one drive and my other
> mailboxes are on a
On Sun, Sep 03 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> I know about the dvd capacity bug and have the patch that Adam Richter
> sent to the list about 3 weeks ago. I was pretty sure the error wasn't
> my DVD drive because I didn't have anything in the drive =)
>
> Thanks for the patch. I'll give it a wh
Ok, did a fsck and got lots and lots of errors/fixes. Everything seems
to be running fine for now.
Thanks
Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
>
> Most likely screwed indirect blocks with pointers _way_ off-base. Or
> direct pointers, for that matter.
>
>
>
I know about the dvd capacity bug and have the patch that Adam Richter
sent to the list about 3 weeks ago. I was pretty sure the error wasn't
my DVD drive because I didn't have anything in the drive =)
Thanks for the patch. I'll give it a whirl.
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Richard Torkar wrote:
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Ok, looking better. I havent been able to forcibly corrupt my mailboxes
> like I did before. Yet anyways. I left my machine for about 10 mins and
> came back and noticed this...
>
> Sep 3 16:46:29 vipe
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Ok, looking better. I havent been able to forcibly corrupt my mailboxes
> like I did before. Yet anyways. I left my machine for about 10 mins and
> came back and noticed this...
>
> Sep 3 16:46:29 viper kernel: attempt to access beyond end of dev
Ok, looking better. I havent been able to forcibly corrupt my mailboxes
like I did before. Yet anyways. I left my machine for about 10 mins and
came back and noticed this...
Sep 3 16:46:29 viper kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Sep 3 16:46:29 viper kernel: 21:01: rw=0, want=10709
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Thomas Molina wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Alot of my mailboxes have become corrupt after trying test8-pre2. I'm
> > back down to test7 and everything seems to be working ok so far. I was
> > able to forcibly corrupt a couple of
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Hello
>
> Alot of my mailboxes have become corrupt after trying test8-pre2. I'm
> back down to test7 and everything seems to be working ok so far. I was
> able to forcibly corrupt a couple of mailboxes by reading unread mail
> from about a week or
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Hello
>
> Alot of my mailboxes have become corrupt after trying test8-pre2. I'm
> back down to test7 and everything seems to be working ok so far. I was
> able to forcibly corrupt a couple of mailboxes by reading unread mail
> from about a week or s
Hello
Alot of my mailboxes have become corrupt after trying test8-pre2. I'm
back down to test7 and everything seems to be working ok so far. I was
able to forcibly corrupt a couple of mailboxes by reading unread mail
from about a week or so ago and exiting. The mailbox would then be
corrupt from
22 matches
Mail list logo
