Any more comments for this idea? :)
On 01/22/2014 03:40 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 01/21/2014 10:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:04:26PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>>
>>> Current scheduler load balance is bottom-up mode, each CPU need
>>> initiate the balance by self.
>>>
>>
On 01/21/2014 10:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:04:26PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> Current scheduler load balance is bottom-up mode, each CPU need
>> initiate the balance by self.
>>
>> 1, Like in a integrate computer system, it has smt/core/cpu/numa, 4
>> level schedul
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:04:26PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> Current scheduler load balance is bottom-up mode, each CPU need
> initiate the balance by self.
>
> 1, Like in a integrate computer system, it has smt/core/cpu/numa, 4
> level scheduler domains. If there is just 2 tasks in whole system
Current scheduler load balance is bottom-up mode, each CPU need
initiate the balance by self.
1, Like in a integrate computer system, it has smt/core/cpu/numa, 4
level scheduler domains. If there is just 2 tasks in whole system that
both running on cpu0. Current load balance need to pull task to
4 matches
Mail list logo
