On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:28:11AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel. We
> > don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth
> > backporting it I
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:28:11AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel. We
don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth
backporting it I think.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:28:54AM +0100, Sander wrote:
> Markus Trippelsdorf wrote (ao):
> > On 2013.03.11 at 16:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > We actually run fsx in a number of different configruations as part of
> > > our regression testing before we send Linus a pull request, and
> > >
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
>
> Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel. We
> don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth
> backporting it I think.
I'll check, bu I suspect it will require an explicit backport; it's
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote (ao):
> On 2013.03.11 at 16:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > We actually run fsx in a number of different configruations as part of
> > our regression testing before we send Linus a pull request, and
> > haven't found any issues. So unless it's a hardware problem, it
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:48:10AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.12 at 14:44 +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800,
On 2013.03.12 at 14:44 +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for reporting this problem. My
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
> > >
> > > As Ted suggested, could you
On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
> >
> > As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree? I want to
> > make sure whether this bug has
On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree? I want to
make sure whether this bug has been fixed by
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
As Ted suggested, could you please try to
On 2013.03.12 at 14:44 +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:48:10AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.12 at 14:44 +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote (ao):
On 2013.03.11 at 16:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
We actually run fsx in a number of different configruations as part of
our regression testing before we send Linus a pull request, and
haven't found any issues. So unless it's a hardware problem, it seems
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel. We
don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth
backporting it I think.
I'll check, bu I suspect it will require an explicit backport; it's
not
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:28:54AM +0100, Sander wrote:
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote (ao):
On 2013.03.11 at 16:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
We actually run fsx in a number of different configruations as part of
our regression testing before we send Linus a pull request, and
haven't
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:30:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree? I want to
> > make sure whether this bug has been fixed by my lastest patch series or
> > not.
>
> It's definitely worth a try to compile the master branch of the ext4
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
>
> Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
>
> As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree? I want to
> make sure whether this bug has been fixed by my lastest patch series or
> not.
It's definitely
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12:27AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.11 at 22:38 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2013.03.11 at 17:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > BTW, I'm currently running
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12:27AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > I've started a full bisection from v3.8 to todays git tree. It will take
> > ~13 steps. However it's already late here in Germany. I will continue
> > the bisection tomorrow and report back.
>
> The issue started with:
On 2013.03.11 at 22:38 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.11 at 17:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with some additional fixes from the
> > > > ext4 dev branch, and I'm not
On 2013.03.11 at 17:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with some additional fixes from the
> > > ext4 dev branch, and I'm not able to reproduce the problem using
> > > rtorrent on my laptop.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with some additional fixes from the
> > ext4 dev branch, and I'm not able to reproduce the problem using
> > rtorrent on my laptop. How reliably is it reproducing for you? Are
> > you
On 2013.03.11 at 16:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2013.03.11 at 15:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network
> > > problem
> > > perhaps ? If something is
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network problem
> > perhaps ? If something is mangling the packet before it hits the disk,
> > that would explain it. What NIC do you use ?
>
> I normally
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.11 at 15:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network problem
> > perhaps ? If something is mangling the packet before it hits the disk,
> > that would explain
On 2013.03.11 at 15:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > I get hash failures on "completed" torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
> > > seems to be fine). What happens
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > I get hash failures on "completed" torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
> > seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete
> >
On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> I get hash failures on "completed" torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
> seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete
> successfully. After reboot however the hash check fails and there are
> missing (or
I get hash failures on "completed" torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete
successfully. After reboot however the hash check fails and there are
missing (or corrupted) chunks. I've tested this with two different
clients (rtorrent
I get hash failures on completed torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete
successfully. After reboot however the hash check fails and there are
missing (or corrupted) chunks. I've tested this with two different
clients (rtorrent
On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
I get hash failures on completed torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete
successfully. After reboot however the hash check fails and there are
missing (or corrupted)
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
I get hash failures on completed torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete
successfully. After
On 2013.03.11 at 15:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
I get hash failures on completed torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8
seems to be fine). What happens is that the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 15:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network problem
perhaps ? If something is mangling the packet before it hits the disk,
that would explain it.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network problem
perhaps ? If something is mangling the packet before it hits the disk,
that would explain it. What NIC do you use ?
I normally use ATL1E,
On 2013.03.11 at 16:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 15:41 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network
problem
perhaps ? If something is mangling the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with some additional fixes from the
ext4 dev branch, and I'm not able to reproduce the problem using
rtorrent on my laptop. How reliably is it reproducing for you? Are
you seeing the
On 2013.03.11 at 17:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with some additional fixes from the
ext4 dev branch, and I'm not able to reproduce the problem using
rtorrent on my laptop. How
On 2013.03.11 at 22:38 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 17:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with some additional fixes from the
ext4 dev branch, and I'm not able to
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12:27AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
I've started a full bisection from v3.8 to todays git tree. It will take
~13 steps. However it's already late here in Germany. I will continue
the bisection tomorrow and report back.
The issue started with:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12:27AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 22:38 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.03.11 at 17:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
BTW, I'm currently running 3.9-rc2 with
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
Thanks for reporting this problem. My deepest apologies.
As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree? I want to
make sure whether this bug has been fixed by my lastest patch series or
not.
It's definitely worth a
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:30:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree? I want to
make sure whether this bug has been fixed by my lastest patch series or
not.
It's definitely worth a try to compile the master branch of the ext4
tree
44 matches
Mail list logo
