4.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
commit 399235dc6e95400a1322ae92073bc572f0c8 upstream.
Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
commit 399235dc6e95400a1322ae92073bc572f0c8 upstream.
Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at
4.2.8-ckt1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
commit 399235dc6e95400a1322ae92073bc572f0c8 upstream.
Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by lo
On Oct 21 '15 18:58, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:58:35PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:49:02PM +0200, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> > > Hi Jarkko,
> > >
> > > your patch "tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:58:35PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:49:02PM +0200, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko,
> >
> > your patch "tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0"
> > showed up as commit 3992
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:49:02PM +0200, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> your patch "tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0"
> showed up as commit 399235dc6e95 in linux-next today (that is,
> next-20151020). I noticed it because we (a researc
Hi Jarkko,
your patch "tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0"
showed up as commit 399235dc6e95 in linux-next today (that is,
next-20151020). I noticed it because we (a research group from
Erlangen[0]) are running daily checks on linux-next.
Your commit creates the
Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method from
TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
tpm_crb modules in order to correctly detect, which module should be
used.
For MSFT0101 we
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Hi
>
> This would need Tested-by's. I've tested it both PTT/fTPM based system
> and dTPM (2.0) based system. Thank you.
I'm on the road at the moment, but I'll be able to test this next week.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam
Hi
This would need Tested-by's. I've tested it both PTT/fTPM based system
and dTPM (2.0) based system. Thank you.
/Jarkko
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:19:28PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
> MSFT0101. They can be differentiated
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:19:28PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
> MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method from
> TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
> tpm_crb modules in
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 18:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
> MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method
> from
> TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
> tpm_crb modules in orde
Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID
MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method from
TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and
tpm_crb modules in order to correctly detect, which module should be
used.
For MSFT0101 we
13 matches
Mail list logo
