On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:45:26 +0100 Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > J�rn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 December 2006 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
> >
> > >> Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
> > >> the same source tree (
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:45:26 +0100 Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 December 2006 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>
> >> Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
> >> the same source tree (so that intermediate fles
> >> and resut files do no
Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 December 2006 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>> Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
>> the same source tree (so that intermediate fles
>> and resut files do not interfere ) ?
>
> I'd try something like this:
> make O=../foo A
On Wed, 2006-12-20 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
> the same source tree (so that intermediate fles
> and resut files do not interfere ) ?
Sure. Use a common source tree and two separate output directories.
You can set
On Wed, 20 December 2006 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>
> Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
> the same source tree (so that intermediate fles
> and resut files do not interfere ) ?
I'd try something like this:
make O=../foo ARCH=foo
make O=../bar ARCH=bar
But as I'm lazy
Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
the same source tree (so that intermediate fles
and resut files do not interfere ) ?
Thanks
Yakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at htt
6 matches
Mail list logo