Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread bert hubert
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:34:37PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > older kernels. That's all, and correctly configured kernels don't break > anything. > > > So instead of papering this breakage over with cleverly worded help texts > > that suggest a solution, how about we set USB_DEVICE_CLASS to 'y'

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 16:20 +0200, bert hubert wrote: > > the separate class device. How does that help text sound? > > > > This option provides backward compatibility for systems where > > usbfs is not mounted, and no udev rule like this exists: > > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add",

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread bert hubert
> the separate class device. How does that help text sound? > > This option provides backward compatibility for systems where > usbfs is not mounted, and no udev rule like this exists: > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", \ >

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 11:25 +0200, bert hubert wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:42:35AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > Any clues? Please let me know how I can help solve this problem! > > > > It works fine for me here. Do you have CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS=y set? > > Ah, I have not. However,

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread bert hubert
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:42:35AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Any clues? Please let me know how I can help solve this problem! > > It works fine for me here. Do you have CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS=y set? Ah, I have not. However, this setting was not present in 2.6.21-rc3, from which

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread bert hubert
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:42:35AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: Any clues? Please let me know how I can help solve this problem! It works fine for me here. Do you have CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS=y set? Ah, I have not. However, this setting was not present in 2.6.21-rc3, from which configuration I

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 11:25 +0200, bert hubert wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:42:35AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: Any clues? Please let me know how I can help solve this problem! It works fine for me here. Do you have CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS=y set? Ah, I have not. However, this

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread bert hubert
the separate class device. How does that help text sound? This option provides backward compatibility for systems where usbfs is not mounted, and no udev rule like this exists: SUBSYSTEM==usb, ACTION==add, ENV{DEVTYPE}==usb_device, \ NAME=bus/usb/$env{BUSNUM}/$env{DEVNUM},

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 16:20 +0200, bert hubert wrote: the separate class device. How does that help text sound? This option provides backward compatibility for systems where usbfs is not mounted, and no udev rule like this exists: SUBSYSTEM==usb, ACTION==add,

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-27 Thread bert hubert
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:34:37PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: older kernels. That's all, and correctly configured kernels don't break anything. So instead of papering this breakage over with cleverly worded help texts that suggest a solution, how about we set USB_DEVICE_CLASS to 'y' by

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:18:54PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > Greg, Kay, kernel people, > > Today I booted 2.6.22-rc2 on Ubunty Edgy Eft, and lsusb died on me: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsusb > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > This behaviour persists in rc4. This

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-26 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 22:18 +0200, bert hubert wrote: > Today I booted 2.6.22-rc2 on Ubunty Edgy Eft, and lsusb died on me: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsusb > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > This behaviour persists in rc4. This might be udev related. I'm running: > ii

udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-26 Thread bert hubert
Greg, Kay, kernel people, Today I booted 2.6.22-rc2 on Ubunty Edgy Eft, and lsusb died on me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ This behaviour persists in rc4. This might be udev related. I'm running: ii udev

udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-26 Thread bert hubert
Greg, Kay, kernel people, Today I booted 2.6.22-rc2 on Ubunty Edgy Eft, and lsusb died on me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ This behaviour persists in rc4. This might be udev related. I'm running: ii udev

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-26 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 22:18 +0200, bert hubert wrote: Today I booted 2.6.22-rc2 on Ubunty Edgy Eft, and lsusb died on me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ This behaviour persists in rc4. This might be udev related. I'm running: ii udev

Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

2007-05-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:18:54PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: Greg, Kay, kernel people, Today I booted 2.6.22-rc2 on Ubunty Edgy Eft, and lsusb died on me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsusb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ This behaviour persists in rc4. This might be udev