On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I copied the patch into the first email, I did look at it which is why
> > you got an email. Your introducing the patch , it's for you to explain
> > why it needs to be there.. considering
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I copied the patch into the first email, I did look at it which is why
> you got an email. Your introducing the patch , it's for you to explain
> why it needs to be there.. considering that the comment says "hack" in
> it, I have to wonder what the
* Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied the patch into the first email, I did look at it which is why
you got an email. Your introducing the patch , it's for you to explain
why it needs to be there.. considering that the comment says hack in
it, I have to wonder what the
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied the patch into the first email, I did look at it which is why
you got an email. Your introducing the patch , it's for you to explain
why it needs to be there.. considering that the
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:36 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:24 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
> > >
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:24 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
> >
> > Grown out of my nose probably.
> >
> > > It looks like patch
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:24 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
>
> Grown out of my nose probably.
>
> > It looks like patch below
> > came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
>
> So what ?
It's
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
Grown out of my nose probably.
> It looks like patch below
> came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
So what ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from? It looks like patch below
came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
--- linux.orig/include/asm-arm/system.h
+++ linux/include/asm-arm/system.h
@@ -235,8 +235,9 @@ static inline void set_copro_access(unsi
* so enable interrupts over the context switch to
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21-rt3 kernel, which can be downloaded
> from the usual place:
>
This is actually regarding v2.6.21-rt5 but I don't remember seeing an
announcement for that one. The attached patch is necessary if you happen
to have RTC_HISTOGRA
Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21-rt3 kernel, which can be downloaded
from the usual place:
This is actually regarding v2.6.21-rt5 but I don't remember seeing an
announcement for that one. The attached patch is necessary if you happen
to have RTC_HISTOGRAM enabled, which
Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from? It looks like patch below
came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
--- linux.orig/include/asm-arm/system.h
+++ linux/include/asm-arm/system.h
@@ -235,8 +235,9 @@ static inline void set_copro_access(unsi
* so enable interrupts over the context switch to
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
Grown out of my nose probably.
It looks like patch below
came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
So what ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:24 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
Grown out of my nose probably.
It looks like patch below
came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
So what ?
It's silencing a
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:24 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
Grown out of my nose probably.
It looks like patch below
came
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:36 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:24 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:11 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from?
Grown
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Please do not top post !
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:10 +0300, emin ak wrote:
Yes, 2.6.21 was compiled and boot successfully for ppc, Is 85xx family
supported for powerpc arch?
I don't know. You might ask the folks on the ppc mailing list.
E.g. check
Please do not top post !
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:10 +0300, emin ak wrote:
> Yes, 2.6.21 was compiled and boot successfully for ppc, Is 85xx family
> supported for powerpc arch?
I don't know. You might ask the folks on the ppc mailing list.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Yes, 2.6.21 was compiled and boot successfully for ppc, Is 85xx family
supported for powerpc arch?
Thanks.
2007/5/18, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:39 +0300, emin ak wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried to compile -rt3 patch for ppc (mpc8540ads) and it failed
> with
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:39 +0300, emin ak wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried to compile -rt3 patch for ppc (mpc8540ads) and it failed
> with undefined referance errors on ppc/kernel/asm-offsets.c. Here is
> the compiler outputs:
arch/ppc is known to be broken. Does it even compile on 2.6.21 vanilla ?
tion of function 'irqs_disabled'
make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Error 1
make: *** [init] Error 2
Is a a compiler issue related to assembler (I'am currently using
gcc-4.0.0) or is this a bug?
Thanks alot.
Emin
2007/5/17, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21-rt3 kernel, which
to assembler (I'am currently using
gcc-4.0.0) or is this a bug?
Thanks alot.
Emin
2007/5/17, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21-rt3 kernel, which can be downloaded
from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
more info about the -rt
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:39 +0300, emin ak wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to compile -rt3 patch for ppc (mpc8540ads) and it failed
with undefined referance errors on ppc/kernel/asm-offsets.c. Here is
the compiler outputs:
arch/ppc is known to be broken. Does it even compile on 2.6.21 vanilla ?
Yes, 2.6.21 was compiled and boot successfully for ppc, Is 85xx family
supported for powerpc arch?
Thanks.
2007/5/18, Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:39 +0300, emin ak wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to compile -rt3 patch for ppc (mpc8540ads) and it failed
with undefined
Please do not top post !
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:10 +0300, emin ak wrote:
Yes, 2.6.21 was compiled and boot successfully for ppc, Is 85xx family
supported for powerpc arch?
I don't know. You might ask the folks on the ppc mailing list.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Please do not top post !
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:10 +0300, emin ak wrote:
Yes, 2.6.21 was compiled and boot successfully for ppc, Is 85xx family
supported for powerpc arch?
I don't know. You might ask the folks on the ppc mailing list.
E.g. check
i'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21-rt3 kernel, which can be downloaded
from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
more info about the -rt patchset can be found in the RT wiki:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
This is a fixes-only release assembled by Thomas Gleixner
i'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21-rt3 kernel, which can be downloaded
from the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
more info about the -rt patchset can be found in the RT wiki:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
This is a fixes-only release assembled by Thomas Gleixner
28 matches
Mail list logo
