Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-18 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > does lockdep pinpoint anything? > > > > Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem. > > Hopefully some of this will help... I have attached the whole bootup > >

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-18 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:18:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > does lockdep pinpoint anything? > > > > Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem. > > Hopefully some of this will help... I have attached the whole b

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > does lockdep pinpoint anything? > > Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem. > Hopefully some of this will help... I have attached the whole bootup > sequence as logged in /var/log/messages. yeah, it pinpointed the

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tombo

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tombo

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as > > > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - fl

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as > > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on > > stock fedora 7 kernel - and both se

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as > > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on > > stock fedora 7 kernel - and both se

Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?)

2007-07-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on > stock fedora 7 kernel - and both seem to hang in the same system call: > > sched_getaffinity(3528