Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Tue 2018-05-29 23:09:09, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > still results in working touchscreen, removing any of the three fields > > > > > breaks it again. > > > > > > > > I bisected one regression down, see

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Tue 2018-05-29 23:09:09, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > still results in working touchscreen, removing any of the three fields > > > > > breaks it again. > > > > > > > > I bisected one regression down, see

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi Pavel, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > still results in working touchscreen, removing any of the three fields > > > > breaks it again. > > > > > > I bisected one regression down, see "omapdrm regression in v4.17-rc > > > series" > > > not sure if it

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi Pavel, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > still results in working touchscreen, removing any of the three fields > > > > breaks it again. > > > > > > I bisected one regression down, see "omapdrm regression in v4.17-rc > > > series" > > > not sure if it

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi! > > > still results in working touchscreen, removing any of the three fields > > > breaks it again. > > > > I bisected one regression down, see "omapdrm regression in v4.17-rc series" > > not sure if it covers all the issues being discussed here though. > > Reverting 24aac6011f70 fixes

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi! > > > still results in working touchscreen, removing any of the three fields > > > breaks it again. > > > > I bisected one regression down, see "omapdrm regression in v4.17-rc series" > > not sure if it covers all the issues being discussed here though. > > Reverting 24aac6011f70 fixes

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi! > > > So... I did some experiments on v4.16. > > > > > > Swapping tsc2005@0 and lcd: acx565akm@2 entries in the dts does break > > > stuff. > > > > > > I thought it might be due to vio regulator, but it does not appear > > > so... screen still works with tsc2005 driver disabled in .config.

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi! > > > So... I did some experiments on v4.16. > > > > > > Swapping tsc2005@0 and lcd: acx565akm@2 entries in the dts does break > > > stuff. > > > > > > I thought it might be due to vio regulator, but it does not appear > > > so... screen still works with tsc2005 driver disabled in .config.

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed 2018-05-23 15:04:56, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pavel Machek [180523 20:14]: > > On Wed 2018-05-23 16:06:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > >

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed 2018-05-23 15:04:56, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pavel Machek [180523 20:14]: > > On Wed 2018-05-23 16:06:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > On Tue

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On 24/05/18 01:02, Aaro Koskinen wrote: But turns out that omapdrm tree is unbisectable, as I get build failures such as (commit 28d79f3e56b2c1d5ff0fd363da3229be0962cc85): /home/aaro/git/devel/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c:1473:52: error: undefined identifier 'dss_debug_dump_clocks'

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On 24/05/18 01:02, Aaro Koskinen wrote: But turns out that omapdrm tree is unbisectable, as I get build failures such as (commit 28d79f3e56b2c1d5ff0fd363da3229be0962cc85): /home/aaro/git/devel/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c:1473:52: error: undefined identifier 'dss_debug_dump_clocks'

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

* Pavel Machek [180523 20:14]: > On Wed 2018-05-23 16:06:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > >

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

* Pavel Machek [180523 20:14]: > On Wed 2018-05-23 16:06:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > > > My device

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:56:38AM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer > > > kernels), > > > but if you say the

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:56:38AM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer > > > kernels), > > > but if you say the

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed 2018-05-23 16:06:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed 2018-05-23 16:06:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer > > > kernels), > > > but if you say the probe

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Wed 2018-05-23 00:56:38, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer > > > kernels), > > > but if you say the probe

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer kernels), > > but if you say the probe order is random then we must find some proper way > > to express the

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > My device worked with v4.17-rc1 (haven't found time to test newer kernels), > > but if you say the probe order is random then we must find some proper way > > to express the

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:02:50AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! I remember that in time of migration from platform board code to > > device tree structures there appeared some bug which caused that > > sometimes display were not

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Tue 2018-05-22 22:41:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:02:50AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! I remember that in time of migration from platform board code to > > device tree structures there appeared some bug which caused that > > sometimes display were not

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:02:50AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! I remember that in time of migration from platform board code to > device tree structures there appeared some bug which caused that > sometimes display were not initialized. And somebody figured out that > display

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:02:50AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! I remember that in time of migration from platform board code to > device tree structures there appeared some bug which caused that > sometimes display were not initialized. And somebody figured out that > display

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Monday 21 May 2018 23:39:53 Pavel Machek wrote: > HI! > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system > > > boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver > > > succeeded. So it

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

On Monday 21 May 2018 23:39:53 Pavel Machek wrote: > HI! > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system > > > boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver > > > succeeded. So it

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

HI! > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system > > boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver > > succeeded. So it should not be early boot crash). > > > > v4.17-rc1 also broke

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

HI! > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system > > boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver > > succeeded. So it should not be early boot crash). > > > > v4.17-rc1 also broke

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi, On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system > boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver > succeeded. So it should not be early boot crash). > > v4.17-rc1 also broke boot on N950. >

Re: v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi, On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system > boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver > succeeded. So it should not be early boot crash). > > v4.17-rc1 also broke boot on N950. >

v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi! v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver succeeded. So it should not be early boot crash). v4.17-rc1 also broke boot on N950. Any ideas? Does it work for you?

v4.17-rc1: regressions on N900, N950

Hi! v4.17-rc1 broke display for me on Nokia N900. (I don't know if system boots, but I can see on red flash LED that at least that driver succeeded. So it should not be early boot crash). v4.17-rc1 also broke boot on N950. Any ideas? Does it work for you?