On 14/03/26, David Miller wrote: > From: Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> > Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:59:23 -0400 > > > + if (err) > > + if (!nlk->portid) > > + netlink_remove(sk); > > + for (int undo = 0; undo < i; undo++) > > + if (nlk->netlink_unbind) > > + > > nlk->netlink_unbind(undo); > > + return err; > > Take a good long stare at that code block for a while. > > Looks like you forgot the braces to delineate the code block.
Did you notice all the attempts to send a corrected patch? v6 finally got it right (sent Monday). Sorry for all the noise. Serve me right for not sitting on my hands before sending the email for a bit while I checked it. > This also means you really haven't tested this patch :-) It was tested, but the patched code wasn't actually checked in. It was still in my tree. I ran "git commit --amend" more than once, forgetting the "-a", and didn't carefully enough inspect the resulting patch. > Please also DO NOT declare local variables in a for() statement, > this is not c++. It is above the for now (also in v6). - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rbri...@redhat.com> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
