* Zhang, Yanmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The solution is just to revert patch
> fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9, because other 2 patches
> which fixed the same issue are already in 2.6.24-rc5.
Linus, please revert fbdcf18df73758, as requested by Yanmin. It was
noticed before (by
With kernel 2.6.24-rc6, volanoMark has much regression.
1) On 8-core stoakley: 17%;
2) On 16-core tigerton: 24%.
I bisected it down to patch fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9. It is
to fix the bad cpu number in /proc/cpuinfo. As a matter of fact, this issue
is already fixed by other 2 patc
2 matches
Mail list logo
