Re: w1: more debug level decrease.

2005-08-12 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:16:12PM +0200, Andi Kleen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Here's a patch for 2.6.13-rc6 to keep people's syslogs a bit nicer. > > But why is this thing running every 10 seconds at all in the first place? > Looks to me like you're j

Re: w1: more debug level decrease.

2005-08-12 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:16:12PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Here's a patch for 2.6.13-rc6 to keep people's syslogs a bit nicer. > > But why is this thing running every 10 seconds at all in the first place? > Looks to me like you're just hiding the sympt

Re: w1: more debug level decrease.

2005-08-12 Thread Andi Kleen
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's a patch for 2.6.13-rc6 to keep people's syslogs a bit nicer. But why is this thing running every 10 seconds at all in the first place? Looks to me like you're just hiding the symptoms, not fixing the bug that makes this code run on unsuspecting systems

w1: more debug level decrease.

2005-08-12 Thread Greg KH
Here's a patch for 2.6.13-rc6 to keep people's syslogs a bit nicer. From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Do not spam syslog each 10 seconds when there is nothing on the wire. Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- dri