[PATCH 4.9 044/212] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-08-20 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Thomas Gleixner commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream. 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1

[PATCH 4.4 026/149] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-08-20 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Thomas Gleixner commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream. 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1

[PATCH 5.4 87/90] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-08-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Thomas Gleixner commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream. 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1

[PATCH 4.14 51/51] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-08-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Thomas Gleixner commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream. 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1

[PATCH 4.19 56/56] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-08-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Thomas Gleixner commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream. 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1

[PATCH 5.7 120/120] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-08-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Thomas Gleixner commit bdd65589593edd79b6a12ce86b3b7a7c6dae5208 upstream. 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1

[tip: x86/urgent] x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-07-29 Thread tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitterDate: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:27:16 +02:00 x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock 0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe lo

x86/i8259: Use printk_deferred() to prevent deadlock

2020-07-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
0day reported a possible circular locking dependency: Chain exists of: &irq_desc_lock_class --> console_owner --> &port_lock_key Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1 lock(&port_lock_key); loc