On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:25:58PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> Here it is below (same disclaimer about crappy mail client). If Boris
> is fine with the changes, Greg, I can send it properly with "git
> send-email" if needed.
Yap, looks ok to me.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:25:58PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> Here it is below (same disclaimer about crappy mail client). If Boris
> is fine with the changes, Greg, I can send it properly with "git
> send-email" if needed.
Yap, looks ok to me.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:25:58PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:55:48PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> >> On the 4.4 kernel, 1f161f67a272c ("x86/microcode: Do the family check
> >> first")
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:25:58PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:55:48PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> >> On the 4.4 kernel, 1f161f67a272c ("x86/microcode: Do the family check
> >> first") does not apply
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> >> > The
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> >> > The backport of 7e702d17ed1
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:55:48PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>> On the 4.4 kernel, 1f161f67a272c ("x86/microcode: Do the family check
>> first") does not apply cleanly. Looks like it relies on 309aac77768c0
>>
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:55:48PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>> On the 4.4 kernel, 1f161f67a272c ("x86/microcode: Do the family check
>> first") does not apply cleanly. Looks like it relies on 309aac77768c0
>> ("x86/microcode: Decrease
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:55:48PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> On the 4.4 kernel, 1f161f67a272c ("x86/microcode: Do the family check
> first") does not apply cleanly. Looks like it relies on 309aac77768c0
> ("x86/microcode: Decrease CPUID use") and 7a93a40be23e5
> ("x86/microcode: Remove local
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:55:48PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> On the 4.4 kernel, 1f161f67a272c ("x86/microcode: Do the family check
> first") does not apply cleanly. Looks like it relies on 309aac77768c0
> ("x86/microcode: Decrease CPUID use") and 7a93a40be23e5
> ("x86/microcode: Remove local
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 28 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 28 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 28 +++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> index
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 28 +++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> index
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>> > The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
>> > late-loading
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
>> > The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
>> > late-loading further with LLC size check")
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> > The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
> > late-loading further with LLC size check") to 4.9.79 and 4.4.14 causes
> > a division by zero
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:24:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> > The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
> > late-loading further with LLC size check") to 4.9.79 and 4.4.14 causes
> > a division by zero
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
> late-loading further with LLC size check") to 4.9.79 and 4.4.14 causes
> a division by zero panic on some single vCPU machine types on Google
> Cloud (e.g. g1-small
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:09:35PM +, Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
> The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
> late-loading further with LLC size check") to 4.9.79 and 4.4.14 causes
> a division by zero panic on some single vCPU machine types on Google
> Cloud (e.g. g1-small
The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
late-loading further with LLC size check") to 4.9.79 and 4.4.14 causes
a division by zero panic on some single vCPU machine types on Google
Cloud (e.g. g1-small and n1-standard-1):
[1.591435] divide error: [#1] SMP
[
The backport of 7e702d17ed1 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
late-loading further with LLC size check") to 4.9.79 and 4.4.14 causes
a division by zero panic on some single vCPU machine types on Google
Cloud (e.g. g1-small and n1-standard-1):
[1.591435] divide error: [#1] SMP
[
22 matches
Mail list logo