Re: x86: spin_unlock(), spin_unlock_irq() & others are out of line ?

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Is it a regression, or is it needed ? > Please see the "Completely out of line spinlocks" thread from about a month ago. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

x86: spin_unlock(), spin_unlock_irq() & others are out of line ?

Hi all I noticed that in current linux kernel versions (2.6.11), some basic functions are out of line (not inlined) Example of a call to spin_unlock() c01069fa: b8 e8 7b 35 c0 mov$0xc0357be8,%eax c01069ff: e8 3c e4 1f 00 call c0304e40 <_spin_unlock> c0304e40

x86: spin_unlock(), spin_unlock_irq() others are out of line ?

Hi all I noticed that in current linux kernel versions (2.6.11), some basic functions are out of line (not inlined) Example of a call to spin_unlock(somelock) c01069fa: b8 e8 7b 35 c0 mov$0xc0357be8,%eax c01069ff: e8 3c e4 1f 00 call c0304e40 _spin_unlock c0304e40

Re: x86: spin_unlock(), spin_unlock_irq() others are out of line ?

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: Is it a regression, or is it needed ? Please see the Completely out of line spinlocks thread from about a month ago. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL