Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2007-01-11 Thread Janos Haar
- Original Message - From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Janos Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:34 AM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spin

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2007-01-10 Thread David Chinner
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:18:08PM +0100, Janos Haar wrote: > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Different corruption in RBX here. Looks like semi-random garbage there. > > I wonder - what's the mac and ip address(es) of your machine and nbd > > servers? > > dy-base: no matches. Oh wel

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2007-01-10 Thread Janos Haar
- Original Message - From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:14 AM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock b

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2007-01-07 Thread David Chinner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 AM > Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? > > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > The filesystem was being shutdown so xfs_inode_item_destroy() just >

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-27 Thread Haar János
Hello, - Original Message - From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 AM Subject: Re: xfslog

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-18 Thread David Chinner
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Haar János wrote: > > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > #define POISON_FREE 0x6b > > > > > > Can you confirm that you are running with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y? > > > > Yes, i build

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-18 Thread David Chinner
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Haar János wrote: > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Haar János wrote: > > > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Ok, I've never heard of a problem like this before and you are doing > > >

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-18 Thread Haar János
- Original Message - From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:36 PM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spin

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-18 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Haar János wrote: > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The NBD serves through eth1, and it is on the CPU3, but the ide0 is on > the > > > CPU0. > > > > I'd say your NBD based XFS filesystem is having trouble. > > > > > > Are you using XFS on a

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-18 Thread Haar János
- Original Message - From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:24 AM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock b

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-17 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:56:41AM +0100, Haar János wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote: > > > I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the > > > spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3. > > > > > > Somebody have any idea? > > > > Your disk i

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-17 Thread Haar János
- Original Message - From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:44 PM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-17 Thread David Chinner
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote: > Hi > > I have some news. > > I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the > spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3. > > Somebody have any idea? Your disk interrupts are directed to CPU 3, and so log I/O complet

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-16 Thread Haar János
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:11 AM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? > Hello, Justin, > > This is a 64bit system. > > But i cannot understand, what is the curious? :-) > > I am not a kernel developer, and not a C programmer, but the long pointers > shows me, the 6

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Haar János
ROTECTED]> To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:32 PM Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug? I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a 32bit or 64bit platform? Justin. On Tue, 12

Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Justin Piszcz
I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a 32bit or 64bit platform? Justin. On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Haar János wrote: > Hello, list, > > I am the "big red button men" with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can > remember me. :-) > > Now i found something in the 2.6.

xfslogd-spinlock bug?

2006-12-11 Thread Haar János
Hello, list, I am the "big red button men" with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can remember me. :-) Now i found something in the 2.6.16.18, and try the 2.6.18.4, and the 2.6.19, but the bug still exists: Dec 11 22:47:21 dy-base BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, xfslogd/3/317 Dec 11 22:47:21 d