On Tue 04-11-14 07:40:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.11.14 at 23:18, wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:41:13PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> having run into that warning too, I looked into it a little, and now
> >> having found that patch am pretty uncertain: Both truncate_setsize()
> >>
>>> On 03.11.14 at 23:18, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:41:13PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> having run into that warning too, I looked into it a little, and now
>> having found that patch am pretty uncertain: Both truncate_setsize()
>> and pagecache_isize_extended() document that they want
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:41:13PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Jan,
>
> having run into that warning too, I looked into it a little, and now
> having found that patch am pretty uncertain: Both truncate_setsize()
> and pagecache_isize_extended() document that they want to be
> called with i_mutex h
Jan,
having run into that warning too, I looked into it a little, and now
having found that patch am pretty uncertain: Both truncate_setsize()
and pagecache_isize_extended() document that they want to be
called with i_mutex held, so removing the WARN_ON() alone seems
either incomplete or wrong. Wh
4 matches
Mail list logo