...
+ spin_lock(mm-page_table_lock);
mm-rss++;
+ spin_unlock(mm-page_table_lock);
...
Would it not be better to use some sort of atomic add/subtract/clear operation
rather than a spinlock? (Which would also give you fewer atomic memory access
cycles).
David
-
To unsubscribe
On 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You have to realize that stability takes precedence over EVERYTHING.
Linus
At least with Linux, if something is *slow*, it generally works *perfect*
or damn near close to it. I'll take that; over Microsoft's being slow AND
buggy AND
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:18:56AM +, David Howells wrote:
...
+ spin_lock(mm-page_table_lock);
mm-rss++;
+ spin_unlock(mm-page_table_lock);
...
Would it not be better to use some sort of atomic add/subtract/clear operation
rather than a spinlock? (Which would also give
On 29 Jan 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
He's keeping in mind who owns Hotmail. However, I think that's unfair
to the Hotmail guys; all the ones I have ever spoken with have been
very professional and genuinely concerned with standards compliance.
I would also keep in mind, that Microsoft
You are probably talking about an Xfree issue. And yes it can be done. I
know several people that do that. Refer to the XFree86 website.
-b
Dax Kelson wrote:
My laptop has a touchpad builtin with two buttons, I also have an external
PS2 and/or USB mouse (3 buttons with scroll wheel).
I
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:49:16PM -0800, Tim Moore wrote:
Is via82cxxx.c v3.17 a 2.4.x only patch or did I miss something else?
Yes, it's currently 2.4.x only.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Hello,
I have got a reproducible file corruption with kernels from
2.2 series. Ftp-ing a 350MB file revealed the problem.
md5sum produced a different checksum on the target host.
In fact any write operation of a similar size will result in
file corruption (i.e. the file written is not the same
David Howells writes:
Would it not be better to use some sort of atomic add/subtract/clear operation
rather than a spinlock? (Which would also give you fewer atomic memory access
cycles).
Please see older threads about this, it has been discussed to death
already (hint: sizeof(atomic_t),
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
On 29 Jan 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
He's keeping in mind who owns Hotmail. However, I think that's unfair
to the Hotmail guys; all the ones I have ever spoken with have been
very professional and genuinely concerned with standards compliance.
I would
At the usual place:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz
(As usual, please allow some minutes for the mirrors to get it)
Changes since last installment:
1) Merge to 2.4.1 final. (me)
2) Accept TCP flags (ACK, URG, RST, etc.) for out of window packets
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I don't know if that's true. The headers I've seen from hotmail users --
and Netcraft seem to agree -- indicate that they have migrated over to
Win2K. I do understand this was a forced migration for non-technical
reasons, and that they had quite
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
The current VIA driver in 2.4.0 is version 2.1e. I wouldn't push a new
version, but VIA has released the vt82c686b chip and it's causing a lot
of trouble.
The 2.1e version can't recognize it from the vt82c686a, the only
Hi!
The current VIA driver in 2.4.0 is version 2.1e. I wouldn't push a new
version, but VIA has released the vt82c686b chip and it's causing a lot
of trouble.
The 2.1e version can't recognize it from the vt82c686a, the only
difference being the revision of the ISA bridge. This causes quite a
I've been trying different 2.4.1-pre kernels trying to find one that
doesn't end up with klogd pegging the CPU. 2.4.0 is OK, but
2.4.1-pre10 to 2.4.1 all leave klogd sitting at 100% CPU.
The machine in question is a Gateway E-3200, a basic PIII-500 running RH
7.0 with all the latest updates
unsubscribe *
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Remember, most of you guys have been coding for years, or working on
the kernel for years. Some of us don't have that level of expertise,
are trying to get it, and feel like we're being told that information
is a private domain we aren't allowed in to.
Note that
Rusty Russell wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0005.3/0269.html
A lot of the timer deletion races are hard to fix because of
the deadlock problem.
Hmmm...
For 2.5, changing the timer interface to disallow
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
I'm not totally convinced that this fixes all problems:
No lockup, and but a slightly increased packet loss: every few minutes a
block of 5-10 packets is lost. Cpu load is low (~30%), I'm running 3
concurrent bw_tcp, the io apic computer is the
Hi Stephen,
Looking more closely at a 2.2.18 bootup tonight I see that apm stuff
appears in dmesg before dmi_scan does (I added "#define DUMP_DMI" in
dmi_scan.c).
If this implies that apm is initialised *before* the dmi_scan then there
is potentially a problem with buggy BIOSen that oops
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44PM -0800, Alan Olsen wrote:
What is the recommended amount of swap with the 2.4.x kernels?
AFAIK, swap requirements for applications running under a 2.4
kernel have not changed significantly from 2.2 kernels
Chris Wedgwood writes:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:33:34AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
2) Accept TCP flags (ACK, URG, RST, etc.) for out of window packets
if truncating the data to the window would make that packet valid.
(Alexey)
3) Add SO_ACCEPTCONN, Unix
Hi!
With 2.4.1-pre10 I sometime get problems with my hda disk:
kernel: hda: timeout waiting for DMA
kernel: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14
kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
kernel: hda: DMA disabled
Now I disable dma at
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:47:02 +1100 (EST),
Neale Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking more closely at a 2.2.18 bootup tonight I see that apm stuff
appears in dmesg before dmi_scan does (I added "#define DUMP_DMI" in
dmi_scan.c).
If this implies that apm is initialised *before* the dmi_scan
Andrew Morton writes:
BTW: can you suggest why I'm not observing any change in NFS client
efficiency?
As in "filecopy speed" or "cpu usage while copying a file"?
The current fragmentation code eliminates a full SKB allocation and
data copy on the NFS file data receive path in the client,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have read and applied /usr/src/linux-2.4.0/Documentation/Changes
in this machine, but...it does not work
Sun UltraSparc
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Mark Hahn wrote:
Kernel 2.4.1-pre11 and pre12 are both massively slower than 2.4.0 on the
same machine, compiled with the same options. The machine is a Athlon
900 on a KT133 chipset. The slowdown is noticealbe in all areas...
this is known: Linus decreed that,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Quim K Holland wrote:
I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why
the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been
applied. [...]
- return_ok = bh-b_reqnext;
+ return_fail = bh-b_reqnext;
oops - i do
I have a Soyo K7VIA motherboard which uses VT82C686A, with an 800mhz Athlon
CPU in it.
So far I've never run a 2.3* or 2.4* kernel on it, I've only done that on my
P3 using a propriatory micron motherboard that uses an intel BX2 chipset.
However, I recently trashed my linux installation (doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just would like to ask all of you what has the option "RTC stores time in
GMT" have to do with APM... The hardware clock in my machine stores time in
GMT, but I do not want APM, so why do I have to have APM just to have that
option enabled...
Ben,
This indeed looks neat and simple !
I'd avoided touching the wait queue structure as I suspected that you might
already have something like this in place :-)
and was hoping that you'd see this posting and comment.
I agree entirely that it makes sense to have chaining of events built over
[FAQ informations at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ are inaccurate -- wrong list
address :-)]
Hello,
There appears to be undefined variable (in pmac_pci), called
PCI_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_KL_USB. When anyone tries to compile the newest kernel
on PPC machine with USB support on, there is an error saying
hi List,
What I can make out from the below statement is that
its better to first enable the device and then
allocate the resources for that.Since from the hot
pluggable point of view if the device is not enabled
,then it does not mean anything to allocate the
resources for it.It would be simply
Hello All,
I compiled the 2.4 kernel on my laptop last night.
After editing lilo, I rebooted the machine. I selected
this new kernel and when it began to boot, it told me
that it was uncompressing the kernel and that the
kernel uncompression was ok. Then it just froze. Any
ideas?
Ryan
-
To
So you have not seen any corruption, but are willing to do testing. Very
kind, but you could have choosen a better subject, I think. There are a
lot more rumours that facts regarding the VIA drivers right now.
/Tobias
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Nicholas Knight wrote:
I have a Soyo K7VIA
I have been running 2.2 on many machines since its release and have updated
to the latest version of 2.2 many times. All of these machines have an
eepro100 and I never saw a single problem with any of them. I updated most
of my machines to 2.4 over the course of a week and within a day of
The "USB Guide" section on HID devices could also be
helpful to you.
http://www.linux-usb.org/USB-guide/x194.html
~Randy / 503-677-5408
___
From: Ben Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You are probably talking about an Xfree issue. And yes it
Hi
got this opps the other day
on a 2.2.18 kernel
i will get more information if it is needed
though i cannot remember what i was doing at the time
ksymoops 0.7 on i686 2.2.18. Options used
-v /home/mistral/data/kernels/P200/vmlinux (specified)
-K (specified)
-l /proc/modules
On Tuesday 30 January 2001 08:14, Micah Gorrell wrote:
I have been running 2.2 on many machines since its release and have updated
to the latest version of 2.2 many times. All of these machines have an
eepro100 and I never saw a single problem with any of them. I updated most
of my machines
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Dax Kelson wrote:
My laptop has a touchpad builtin with two buttons, I also have an external
PS2 and/or USB mouse (3 buttons with scroll wheel).
I would like to be able to use the touchpad, and then plug in the mouse
(with either PS2 or USB connector) and use it
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
Todd,
I just got back some more numbers from Dolphin. The newer D330
LC3 chipsets are running at 667 MB/S Link speed, and on a
Serverworks HE system, we are seeing 240 MB/S
** Reply to message from David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Jan
2001 11:11:27 +
Note that this is _precisely_ the reason I'm advocating the removal of
sleep_on(). When I was young and stupid (ok, "younger and stupider") I used
sleep_on() in my code. I pondered briefly the
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:30:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
celeron 433 intel i810. 320MB ram.
Before 2.2.18. Now I've tested with both
2.4.1-pre12 and 2.4.1. 2.4 kernel klogd is
always using 99% cpu. What gives?
I've three other less powerful boxes running
2.4.x kernels and
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:32:08AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
Also, The numbers were more provided as a comparison between 2.2.x
kernels and 2.4.X kernels with SCI. You
Is this possible with the new "Input Drivers" in the 2.4 kernel? Is
it possible with Linux at all?
Yes. For X do this:
Section "Pointer"
Protocol"ImPS/2"
Device "/dev/input/mice"
ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection
-
To unsubscribe
jeff,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On 32 bit PCI, the average we are seeing going userpace - userspace is
120-140 MB/S ranges in those systems that have a PCI bus with
bridge chipsets that can support these data rates.
That's 2 x G-Enet.
good numbers. not really 2 x Gig-e,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:07:07AM -0700, Todd wrote:
folx,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
What numbers does G-Enet provide
doing userspace - userspace transfers, and at what processor
overhead?
using stock 2.4 kernel and alteon acenic cards with stock firmware we're
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:53:59AM -0800, David Rees wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:30:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
celeron 433 intel i810. 320MB ram.
Before 2.2.18. Now I've tested with both
2.4.1-pre12 and 2.4.1. 2.4 kernel klogd is
always using 99% cpu. What gives?
Hello all
Can anyone tell me where I can find infomation on digiboard support in
linux specifically the PC/X model?
THanks
-Ken
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
I haven't tried 2.4.1 yet but I will be soon (prolly today) and I will let
you know if I still see problems.
Micah
___
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating system
and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the world
-Original Message-
From: "Davide
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
[snip]
I may have missed too much of the discussion, but I thought that the
idea was that some people noted that their POST-code-cards don't
really work all that well when Linux is running because Linux keeps on
sending garbage to port 0x80.
You
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
Sparc servers. The adapters these drivers I posted support are a bi-CMOS
implementation of the SCI
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:48:33AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
It has. We now leave dirty pages swapcached, which means that
for certain workloads Linux 2.4 eats up much more swap space
than Linux 2.2.
Ah.. thanks for the clarification. Is this duplication "hard" or "soft"?
i.e. under
Since I'm running the 2.4.x kernels, I'm having a little problem with my
parallel zip-disk. The ppa module can't use the EPP 32 protocol and uses
the PS/2 protocol instead (which is much slower), as shown by the boot
message of kernel 2.4.1:
ppa: Version 2.07 (for Linux 2.4.x)
ppa: Found
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
[snip]
I may have missed too much of the discussion, but I thought that the
idea was that some people noted that their POST-code-cards don't
really work all that well when Linux is running because Linux
After compiling 2.4 and 2.4ac11 I got failed boots as well, getting
either
LI
or
LIL
And then nothing. This is a K6-2 450 machine, all previous (2.4.0-test*)
kernels worked fine. The correct processor is selected...
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set
[...]
Now, we've found that small delays are reasonably well generated with
an "outb" to 0x80. So, indeed changing that to something else is going
to be tricky.
So how bad would it be to give these people a place to leave the value
that they want to have displayed, and have the
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
Sparc servers. The adapters these drivers I posted support are a bi-CMOS
implementation of the SCI
Will this chip need any kernel support or
will it just need to be supported in usermode?
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2680013,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_rt_latest
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Miles Lane wrote:
Will this chip need any kernel support or
will it just need to be supported in usermode?
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2680013,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_rt_latest
It looks like CPRM on the mainboard.
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
While reclaiming swap space when you run out is pretty
trivial to do, Linus doesn't seem to like the idea all
that much and Disk Space Is Cheap(tm) so it's not very
high on my list of things to do.
'anybody who says "disk is cheap" deserves to be
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, mirabilos wrote:
[...]
Now, we've found that small delays are reasonably well generated with
an "outb" to 0x80. So, indeed changing that to something else is going
to be tricky.
So how bad would it be to give these people a place to leave the value
that
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
While reclaiming swap space when you run out is pretty
trivial to do, Linus doesn't seem to like the idea all
that much and Disk Space Is Cheap(tm) so it's not very
high on my list of things to do.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "mirabilos" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Linux-Kernel ML" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Mark H. Wood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT
On Tue, 30
Has anyone else signed up on the NSA's secure Linux
discussion list? The idea of NSA backing the development
of a secure GPL'd linux is one I find intriguing.
However I have only seen one posting. Is there anyone
"real" involved with it?
--
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Dale Amon wrote:
Has anyone else signed up on the NSA's secure Linux
discussion list? The idea of NSA backing the development
of a secure GPL'd linux is one I find intriguing.
However I have only seen one posting. Is there anyone
"real" involved with it?
That would
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:32:33PM +0100, Micha? 'CeFeK' Nazarewicz wrote:
There appears to be undefined variable (in pmac_pci), called
PCI_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_KL_USB. When anyone tries to compile the newest kernel
on PPC machine with USB support on, there is an error saying that this is
Everyone who says, disk is cheap, ought to donate me one.
Everyone who says, memory is cheap, has to send me some.
I'm still stuck with a P-133, 56 MB RAM (60-70 ns, some EDO,
some FPM) and not only Linux but also W2K on a 2.1 and a 0.8 GB
HDD.
I accept donations in IDE and SCSI, as well as
I'm being asked to read values from arbitrary locations on the PCI
bus... but I need to do that without altering the kernel... is there a
way to do that as root?
From what I understand, /proc/kcore has only the physical RAM.
TIA,
Eli
. "To the systems programmer, users and
I have not really looked into this but I think this option is only supported
when the audio hardware supports bass and treble.
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
I have one small question about the Linux mixer device. I realize that
the drivers (such as OSS and ALSA) have their own standards for
Hi,
I've set up a tentative fix for the problem we have against some NFS
servers that use cookies that don't fit into 32-bits signed. So far
reports have mainly involved IRIX servers (which use unsigned 64-bit
cookies by default on NFSv3 and in particular use (~0) to signify end
of directory)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:22:20PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
At the moment there is no way to reclaim the swap space if
the page is shared, and for non-shared pages we haven't
implemented a way to reclaim swap space.
While reclaiming swap space when you run out is pretty
trivial to do,
"Kevin" == Kevin Krieser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin You mean my current 1.9 gig of swap is overkill? :) I have
Kevin 256MB of RAM, and am currently not using any of the swap.
Looks like you are a perfect candidate for testing shmfs[1] as /tmp, eh?
[1] or vmfs or tmpfs or whatever it ends
Hello.
When I boot my system (Vine Linux 2.1), my system crashes.
This oops is reproducable with the kernels: 2.4.0-ac11,
2.4.0-ac12 and 2.4.1(probably all = 2.4.0-ac).
The decoded oops follows:
-
ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.1. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 07:17:28PM +0100, Davy Preuveneers wrote:
Since I'm running the 2.4.x kernels, I'm having a little problem with my
parallel zip-disk. The ppa module can't use the EPP 32 protocol and uses
the PS/2 protocol instead (which is much slower), as shown by the boot
message of
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:22:20PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
At the moment there is no way to reclaim the swap space if
the page is shared, and for non-shared pages we haven't
implemented a way to reclaim swap space.
While reclaiming swap
What is the status of autofs4? There is no mention in
2.4.0/Doc/Changes. There doesn't seem to be any activity in the
ftp.kernel.org/.../autofs area. Is autofs4 alive?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
Dear Hotmail Staff,
as I will soon be unable to receive eMail from certain people,
I strongly suggest exchanging the software of your Cisco fire-
walls by a newer version _yet released_ by Cisco which is able
to cope with ECN-connections instead of sending them RST.
I do not speak only for me
From: Simon Cahuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 14:22:26 EST
I have a ymfpci sound chip on my motherboard. I'm using ymfpci module.
Under Q3A I get this:
sound inilializations:
Sorry but your soundcard can't do this
Probably an mmap-ed sound problem or some ioctl is
Hi Linus,
the patch below contains 3 small changes to mm/filemap.c:
1. replace the aging in __find_page_nolock() with setting
PageReferenced(), otherwise a large number of small
reads from (or writes to) a page can drive up the page
age unfairly
2. remove the wakeup of kswapd from
Actually what rumors are you hearing?
Right now I can tell you from personal experience that the VIA VT82C686A
chipset is causing kernel deaths, corrupted data on my drives, and UDMA
issues (meaning that when I enable the UDMA support the kernel
CONSISTENTLY crashes.)
This is all pre
Hi,
On this list new version of XFS for Linux has just been announced.
Reiserfs has been included into official kernel tree. My question is
about benchmarks beetween XFS and rfs. XFS is said to a very flexible
and fast journaling filesystem (well, at least by SGI ;-) and rfs seems
to be cool
Sorry if this question has been answered already, or if this is the wrong
venue for it but I have done a lot of searching and haven't been able to
find much.
What is the status of the megaraid driver in 2.4.x? I am a little confused
as to what versions are what so I will summarize what I know:
Donghui Wen wrote:
I am hacking the implementation of linux2.4's
networking (IPV4) . Can anyone give me some idea
what material I should read to understand the
data structures and algorithms. I have stevens's
books which talked about BSD's implementation.
Thanks!
Donghui
Print it
Greetings. I've just procured myself a copy of 2.4.1, and tried to build
it. At the tail end of a make modules_install, the following error occurs:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/drivers/md/md.o
depmod: name_to_kdev_t
My first assumption was that this
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rusty Russell wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0005.3/0269.html
A lot of the timer deletion races are hard to fix because of
the deadlock problem.
Hmmm...
For 2.5, changing the timer
Guys,
from .config on 2.4.1
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD is not set
CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
Shouldn' t the value be CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO instead of CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO
in the code below?
Steve
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at
I updated the Wavelan IEEE driver from 2.3.50 so that it builds with 2.4.0
(The 2.3.50 patch is available at
http://www.fasta.fh-dortmund.de/users/andy/wvlan/ ) It works for me but
I've heard there are issues with firmware 6.xx not initializing.
The patch against 2.4.0 is at
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Stephen Clark wrote:
Guys,
from .config on 2.4.1
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD is not set
CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
Shouldn' t the value be CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO instead of CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO
in the code below?
No
bash-2.04# dmesg | grep -i udma
VP_IDE: VIA vt82c686a IDE UDMA66 controller on pci0:7.1
hda: 30015216 sectors (15368 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=1868/255/63, UDMA(66)
hdb: 80041248 sectors (40981 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=4982/255/63, UDMA(66)
hdc: ATAPI 52X CD-ROM drive, 192kB Cache, UDMA(33)
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/drivers/media/radio/radio-miropcm20.o
depmod: aci_write_cmd
depmod: aci_indexed_cmd
depmod: aci_write_cmd_d
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Save yourself the headache.
Despite the fact that it is based on the 2.2 network core, the Coriolis book
Linux IP Stacks was a good book of source code to scip to parts of the code
which was related to my interests. It may be a little different now, with the
iptables rework, but besides that, it
[1.] Bug in drivers/char/mem.c
[2.] An if statement (#if !defined) has apparently been left out of
drivers/char/mem.c. This breaks the build on the m68k architecture.
[3.] Kernel 2.4.1
[4.] Oops: Not applicable
[6.] Try building a kernel on m68k.
[7.] Env: not applicable.
[7.1.] Software (add
Bernd wrote thusly:
|In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
| I've done a quick inspection of pre7 patch set and noticed about the
| same thing. Is this an oversight, did someone intentionally turn off
| core dumping until some other widget is incorporated into the
patches,
| or none of the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
This one is an UP and SMP race:
spin_unlock_irq(timerlist_lock);
+ if (timer-event)
+ {
+ if ((requeue = timer-event(data)))
+ {
+ timer-expires += requeue;
+ internal_add_timer(timer);
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ timer-function(data); /*
Hi,
Just noticed the SCSI drivers for the ACORN bus weren't
updated to the new initialization. AFAIK these drivers couldn't
have been functional without this patch.
Patch is against 2.4.1
--
Torben Mathiasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux ThunderLAN maintainer
http://opensource.compaq.com
Hi, I have a Matrox G200 card installed on an Ali motherboard.
Sometimes when I use any opengl program my box crashes. It is more
likely that it will crash if I have used the xvideo extension or the
matroxfb, but this is not a must, it simply increases the chance of a
crash, which is very high
Hi,
Installed a Matrox G450 on my linux system. Now it has problems
booting. The kernel is compiled with framebuffer support so is supposed
to boot up with the Linux logo. Unfortunately the systems hangs when
the kernel switches to the graphics mode. When I first boot into windoze
and the
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/arch/i386/boot'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `dep'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/arch/i386/boot'
scripts/mkdep init/*.c .depend
scripts/mkdep `find
If Mandrake used LILO to install, there very well might be a backup in
/boot/boot.0800 or something like that. You might want to consult the
LILO documentation and/or a net search to see if they say how to restore
this (probably using dd).
If you have real W2K media, it has boot floppies and a
try the latest driver that matrox provides. i had to do this with just a
stock redhat 7.0 system. i don't think the standard kernel distributions
redhat packages use a driver that knows about the 450 yet.
http://www.matrox.com/mga/support/drivers/files/linux_04.cfm
-tcl.
On Tue, 30 Jan
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
