(Resending because I accidentally sent the original to vger.rutgers.edu.)
The following patch allows (at least, when combined with loop-5B) loopback
root mounting to work again. Without it, the boot process ends with
something along the lines of "kernel panic: I have no root and I want to
Hi!
I'm putting together a maintenance/rescue CD. It's bootable with
RH6.2 (2.2.16) "installed" - ie the root fs is on the CD itself, no
harddrives involved. I've run across a slight inconvenience:
when I shutdown the CD is still locked in the drive. I have to power-off
then power-on again to
Hi all,
I send you a patch to the Moxa Smartio driver in the 2.4.1 kernel.
There are included the fixes which I've made to make my Moxa Smartio Card
work.
First there is backed out the wrong fix which was included in some of the
2.4.0-testxx version. Then there is a fix to the PCI lookup of the
Hi,
Is there a bug in multicast IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP that
when you try to join a multicast group on a certain
interface(the wildcard or unspecified interface), it
will return with "no such device"?
I am using redhat 6.1.
If there is a bug, is it fixed? what is the patch
number i should apply?
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:52:18 GMT, in fa.linux.kernel, Alan Cox wrote:
I don't believe IBM have provided an 'official' 2.4 patch set for the serveraid
yet so there may be bugs lurking.
They have, but they keep it pretty well hidden. Version 4.50 of the
ServeRAID driver seems to support kernel
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:11:26PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Hi everyone,
We have set up a network console project on sourceforge and are starting
to work on actual details. If you're interested in this subject please
do join that list.
DEC's old protocol called MOP (Maintainence and
Le 21 Feb 2001 01:13:03 +0100, Andreas Bombe a crit :
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:09:55AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le 20 Feb 2001 02:10:12 +0100, Andreas Bombe a crit :
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 09:53:48PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi!
Another problem that I seem to have, of which I have had reports from
clients, is that the server has problems talking to clients using modems
This didn't occur before with the 2.2 series kernel (all other things held
constant). It seems each time a client tries to load up any site on
hello and thank you for your answers.
"Albert D. Cahalan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have processes that have to be really over 1gb (database engines) but
unfortnately, when one reaches over 900mb kswapd starts eating 50+% of 1
cpu and the whole thing gets slower.
You didn't provide
Hi there,
running "top" on a 2.2.18 Kernel showed me the ammount of memory shared.
Now under 2.4.x "top" always displays "0" and i have mountet the tmpfs (if it's needed
for that ?).
Is shared memory gone? Is my "top" to old?! I think i've installed all needed versions
as described in
Ookhoi writes:
We have exactly the same problem but in our case it depends on the
following three conditions: 1, kernel 2.4 (2.2 is fine), 2, windows ip
header compression turned on, 3, a free internet access provider in
Holland called 'Wish' (which seemes to stand for 'I Wish I had a
I've just installed an AHA1542 SCSI card, and when performing a backup,
I'm finding the kernel is spewing out the following message:
Wrong buffer length supplied for request sense (256)
This is because the sense_buffer is 16 bytes, but the buffer supplied
is 256 bytes.
Looking at the 2.4
Hello!
of errors a bit but I'm not sure I fully understand the implications of
doing so.
Until these numbers do not exceed total amount of RAM, this is exactly
the action required in this case.
OK! I actually expected 2.4 to be somewhat selftuning. But if I exceed the
amount of
Hi David,
We have exactly the same problem but in our case it depends on the
following three conditions: 1, kernel 2.4 (2.2 is fine), 2, windows ip
header compression turned on, 3, a free internet access provider in
Holland called 'Wish' (which seemes to stand for 'I Wish I had a
To: Memory management people.
Subject:System Crash
Stats: Dual PII 400MHz
Supermicro P6DBE MoBo
http://www.supermicro.com/PRODUCT/MotherBoards/440BX/p6dbe.htm
256MB ECC SDRAM 100MHz FSB
530136k Swap on SCSI
Can someone confirm that the 2.4.1-ac15+ quota system is NOT broken? I am
having problems running quota-2.00 on 2.4.1-ac15 although quota worked fine
in 2.4.0.
You need the newer quota utilities. -ac fixes the quota support to handle
32bit uids
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
sorry.. the topic is bit off the track..
does hp-ux supports raw sockets?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
This is a while back, but I thought the solution Philipp and I came up
with was to simply used a rw semaphore for this, which was taken (read
only) on page fault if we have to scan the exception table.
We can take page faults in interrupt handlers in 2.4 so I had to use a
spinlock, but that
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Thomas Foerster wrote:
running "top" on a 2.2.18 Kernel showed me the ammount of memory shared.
Now under 2.4.x "top" always displays "0" and i have mountet the
tmpfs (if it's needed for that ?).
Is shared memory gone? Is my "top" to old?! I think
sorry.. the topic is bit off the track..
does hp-ux supports raw sockets?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
SUBTERFUGUE 0.2 is available. It's been updated to work with the new 2.4
kernel and also includes a few other bug fixes and improvements. It's
available in source or Debian package form.
As always, feedback is welcome.
--Mike
" " == Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- cannot do ".." lookups efficiently, or doesn't want to and
- can protect against this sort of loop (and any other issues
that
the VFS usually protects against) itself
then it can (with my patch) simply define
Hello,
after upgrading to 2.2.19pre9 (+ 2 NFS-patches, IPv6 enabled) idle
connections tend to shut down without a visible reason:
client-ssh server
Last login: Mon Feb 19 2001 18:01:12 from client.domain
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.8 Generic February 2000
You have mail.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:47:24AM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
[snip]
We have exactly the same problem but in our case it depends on the
following three conditions: 1, kernel 2.4 (2.2 is fine), 2, windows ip
header compression turned on, 3, a free internet access provider in
Holland called 'Wish'
The integrated LAN on Intel boards with i815 chipset
apparently is not fully supported. In latest 2.2.x and 2.4.x,
with the EtherExpress Pro100 driver, after some network traffic,
it locks. The only way I can use the net again is either reboot,
or ifconfig eth0 down; ifconfig
I also saw this when my 2.2.19pre12/13 workstation
connected to a
2.2.19pre8 isdn-router. When downloading a large
file via ftp at max
speed, other connections don't 'get through'.
Perhaps other people can agree/disagree on this?
Jurriaan
FWIW, that happens to me on the stock 2.4.1
is it first download kernel 2.2.18 and goto alan dir download :
www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.2.19pre/ ?
and goto patch my kernel 2.2.18 ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
Thomas Lau wrote:
config:
NE2000-PCI NIC
AMD K6-2+ 200
256M RAM
LINUX-KERNEL-2.4.1-AC18
CABLE MODEM TYPE:
- TERAYON
- DHCP
Problem:
When I reboot system, it's OK
but when I use a long time ( over 24 hours )
only receive or send light are flash on , another LED will not happen (
Hello,
Context:
HDLC PCI adapter + line at 2 Mb/s + external traffic generator that fills
the line with 5 to x1000 bytes frame.
I want to see how my code bahaves during rare (?) events: an overflow of
the RX fifo (256 bytes) and a TX underrun. It's my understanding that if the
adapter pains
--
A E Lawrence
2.4.2-pre4 freezes, 2.4.2-pre3 ext2/scsi problem
This is a minimal report of a problem on a modestly overclocked but very well
tested Athlon system. In view of the overclocking, it will require
confirmation by others, and some
I want to see how my code bahaves during rare (?) events: an overflow of
the RX fifo (256 bytes) and a TX underrun. It's my understanding that if the
adapter pains at DMAing, those errors should be triggered.
Could I/O at a inocuous location (a well-choosen PCI register ?) be enough
for
after upgrading to 2.2.19pre9 (+ 2 NFS-patches, IPv6 enabled) idle
connections tend to shut down without a visible reason:
Yes I've seen this too. It seems that the tcp changes broke the keepalive
handling somewhere when I leave a non Linux target idle.
Dave - any ideas, shall we back it out
"Alan" == Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
after upgrading to 2.2.19pre9 (+ 2 NFS-patches, IPv6 enabled) idle
connections tend to shut down without a visible reason:
Alan Yes I've seen this too. It seems that the tcp changes broke the
Alan keepalive handling somewhere when I leave a non
Jes Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I only see this for connections with incoming traffic where I don't
send something out (like irc), whereas unused ssh connections seem to
survive fine.
Just for the record: My example was an idle ssh connection!
I believe Alan is correct. I can't
On Feb 21 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:15:02PM -0800, Shane Wegner wrote:
Ok, can I still use -u1 -k1 -c1 on the drives or is it even
necessary anymore.
If you enable automatic DMA in the kernel config, it isn't necessary
at all. The VIA driver sets up
This is the 3rd day in a row i got an oops.
The only difference this time was the machine had one postgresql running, with
mailsnarf, vmstat, apache and inetd; without any load.
The oops (passed through ksymoops 2.4) is attached, with the dmesg.
Linux sol 2.4.1 #3 SMP Wed Feb 14 18:14:33 ARST
On Feb 21 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
Don't do that. Use the kernel option to enable DMA instead.
You mean using hdparm can cause problems? Could you provide
more details on the problems that could arise? I'm completely
ignorant on the subject...
[]s, Roger...
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Its normal tcp behaviour. Its something called the capture effect. You can
mitigate it to an extent by using less buffers, but the buffer count in question
is at the ISP end for a download, or by using smaller windows
Some dumb questions.
Does this
please check it, I got error when I patch , Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Does anyone know some good documentation about handling sk_buffers ?
I'll need to work with them for some kind of filter.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hello I have two questions regarding Linux 2.0.x
1. Did anybody tried running Linux 2.0.x on the Intel i840 chipset based
boards?
2. Does anybody knows of a 2.0.x driver for Intel's 82543GC Gigabit Ethernet
MAC (aka e1000) ?
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Gabi Davar
Does this explain why the kernel sees bad segments? Do you know what
changed between pre8 and pre10 so that I can undo it? Exactly which
windows should be smaller?
It doesnt explain bad segments.
TCP windows
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Colonel wrote:
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
or MM related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
issues. This would explain why the
All are as attachments, I've submitted them separately over 2.4.1-ac16, these
are remade over -ac20.
Descriptions:
* ac20-redundant-cpp-directive.patch: in
arch/i386/kernel/irq.c:irq_affinity_write_proc, there was a redundant #if
CONFIG_SMP .. #endif directive. This patch removes it.
*
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Care to include the actual patches tho..
Argh! Brain damage... Sorry...
--
Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Normand et fier de l'tre
"Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more
idiot-proof software, and universe,
Some more info. I tried disabling the hdparm command, that didn't
make the 2.4.2-pre4 mount succesfully.
I tried 2.4.2-pre1 and that booted fine.
I'll try pre2 and pre3 versions when I get a chance (thursday night)
and see about turning up the log level, too.
Here is the info on PCI and the
On 20-Feb-2001 Daniel Phillips wrote:
Earlier this month a runaway installation script decided to mail all its
problems to root. After a couple of hours the script aborted, having
created 65535 entries in Postfix's maildrop directory. Removing those
files took an awfully long time. The
Hello!
OK! I actually expected 2.4 to be somewhat selftuning.
Defaults for these numbers (X,Y,Z) are very conservative.
Interesting you say that, I looked at the logs and I see over 5000 sockets
used, does'nt look peaceful to me. But you are absolutely right about the
orphans. The error
Perhaps this is a faq...
I have a dual-800 (mb asus, no AGP) with 1GB ram,
but according to /proc/meminfo tells I only have
90KB. I tried "mem=1024" boot parameter without
success. How can I get my 128MB back ?
Bye.
Giuliano Pochini -)|(- Shiny Corporation {AS6665} -)|(-
-
To
Quoting Brian Gerst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This one just looks really odd. I can't figure out where the faulting
address (0x9fac) is coming from. It's not from the ret
instruction,
which should be getting a valid return address off the stack. Do you
still have the raw oops message
Can you guys test this patch, and let me know if it fixes Via audio
problems on your kernel?
It should apply against 2.4.1 or 2.4.1-acXX kernels. Note that it
should be applied with "patch -p0" while in the linux kernel source
directory, not applied with "patch -p1".
Regards,
Jeff
Update on the "unregister_netdevice" bug ...
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo found one bug but there
remains another one that makes the dev-refcnt too
high instead of too low.
To be continued ...
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Hi,
free is not an interesting command. Much more interesting is the kernel
messages on boot, e.g. on my laptop it looks like this:
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 @ (usable)
BIOS-e820: 0400 @ 0009fc00 (reserved)
BIOS-e820:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:49:17PM +1100, Richard Gooch wrote:
You definately can mknod(2) on devfs. [..]
So then why don't we simply create the VG ourself with the right minor number
and use it as we do without devfs? We'll still have a global 256 VG
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
yes, just run the famous mptable program. If the machine is SMP then it
will have a valid Intel MP 1.4 configuration tables so the program will
show meaningful output.
Does that allow you to detect multiple processors... or just an SMP board?
Alberto Bertogli wrote:
This is the 3rd day in a row i got an oops.
The only difference this time was the machine had one postgresql running, with
mailsnarf, vmstat, apache and inetd; without any load.
The oops (passed through ksymoops 2.4) is attached, with the dmesg.
Linux sol 2.4.1
Colonel wrote:
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:45:02 -0600
From: "James A. Pattie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colonel wrote:
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
Perhaps this is a faq...
I have a dual-800 (mb asus, no AGP) with 1GB ram,
but according to /proc/meminfo tells I only have
90KB. I tried "mem=1024" boot parameter without
success. How
as you can see, the above tells you exactly how many pages you have in
each zone and the total number of usable pages. But even that is not
relevant to your question. What is relevant is the number
after the first
"/" in the "Memory:" line and also the BIOS-e820 map, of course.
Also, on
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Matthias Kleine wrote:
The problem appears on a machine using the pretty new ASUS CUVX-D Dual Socket
370 Motherboard, so there may be a chance for an unknown bug ;-). With NMI
watchdog activated, a 2.4.x Kernel is not willing to boot on this machine, it
just stops
[LVM list removed so I don't get the nastygram]
Andrea Arcangeli writes:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:49:17PM +1100, Richard Gooch wrote:
You definately can mknod(2) on devfs. [..]
So then why don't we simply create the VG ourself with the right
minor number and use it as we do without
I try to figure aout the different values taken by snd_cwnd
and after a little of work i find out that the number 2 is
the maximum reached.. even when passing a 100MB file on a
LAN
can you explain that to me???
I'm working on a 2.4.1 kernel
i386
i've tried out with proc and printk
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
yes, just run the famous mptable program. If the machine is SMP then it
will have a valid Intel MP 1.4 configuration tables so the program will
show meaningful output.
Does that allow you to detect
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
Perhaps this is a faq...
I have a dual-800 (mb asus, no AGP) with 1GB ram,
but according to /proc/meminfo tells I only have
90KB. I tried "mem=1024" boot parameter without
success. How can I get my 128MB back ?
Bye.
Giuliano
What is the platform ( x86, Sparc, alpha or ?)? On sparc look in the
bootprom (ls /proc/openprom) that works regardless of kernel SMP status.
On Intel I think your out of luck, at least with the commonly available
hardware/software. In theory there could be a bios-peeking structure in
/proc
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:49:17PM +1100, Richard Gooch wrote:
You definately can mknod(2) on devfs. [..]
So then why don't we simply create the VG ourself with the right minor number
and use it as we do without devfs? We'll still have a global 256 VG limit this
way but that's not a minor
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
yes, just run the famous mptable program.
before I am snowed under with questions about where to get this program,
here is the src and binaries that I use -- it is quite possible that there
is a newer version (I suspect Ingo Molnar might know better
yes, just run the famous mptable program. If the machine is SMP then it
will have a valid Intel MP 1.4 configuration tables so the program will
show meaningful output.
Regards,
Tigran
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Burton Windle wrote:
Hello. Is there a way, when running a non-SMP kernel, to detect or
"Jens Axboe wrote:"
It will still cluster, the code above checks if the next bh is
contigious -- if it isn't, then check if we can grow another segment.
So you may be lucky that some buffer_heads in the chain are indeed
contiguous, that's what the segment count is for. This is exactly
the
On 21-Feb-2001 Giuliano Pochini wrote:
Perhaps this is a faq...
I have a dual-800 (mb asus, no AGP) with 1GB ram,
but according to /proc/meminfo tells I only have
90KB. I tried "mem=1024" boot parameter without
success. How can I get my 128MB back ?
Check Your BIOS setting coz some
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
Perhaps this is a faq...
I have a dual-800 (mb asus, no AGP) with 1GB ram,
but according to /proc/meminfo tells I only have
90KB. I tried "mem=1024" boot parameter without
success. How can I get my 128MB back ?
when you compile your
Hello!
I have the following problem.
A user process wants to talk to a PCI board via DMA. The first step I did was
to resolv the physical addresses of the data in user space. This works fine
when writing to the device. But when reading the buffer isn't allocated
and the physical addresses are
"A month of sundays ago Jens Axboe wrote:"
The implementation in ll_rw_blk.c (and other places) assumes that
a failed request just means the first chunk and it then makes sense
to just end i/o on that buffer and resetup the request for the next
buffer. If you want to completely scrap the
On Wed, Feb 21 2001, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
I'm particularly concerned about the error behaviour. How should I set
up the end_request code in the case when the request is to be errored?
Recall that my end_request code is presently like this:
io_spin_lock
while
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
when you compile your 2.4.x kernel make sure you set the "4G of RAM"
option, i.e. CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G. If you chose "up to 1G" then
it means "up
to 986M" (or something like that) -- the number in Help is
just rounded up
~~~
not
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article 01022100361408.18944@gimli you wrote:
But actually, rm is not problem, it's open and create. To do a
create you have to make sure the file doesn't already exist, and
without an index you have to scan on average half the directory
"Markus" == Markus Germeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Markus Jes Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I only see this for connections with incoming traffic where I don't
send something out (like irc), whereas unused ssh connections seem
to survive fine.
Markus Just for the record: My example
Hi David!
We have exactly the same problem but in our case it depends on the
following three conditions: 1, kernel 2.4 (2.2 is fine), 2, windows ip
header compression turned on, 3, a free internet access provider in
Holland called 'Wish' (which seemes to stand for 'I Wish I had a
A rather incomprehensible message, so let's flesh this out a bit.
Basically the problem occurs when patching linux/fs/reiserfs/namei.c It
can't find it, presumably due to an error in 2.4.1, where it appears to
me that reiserfs/ is located off of linux/ not linux/fs/. Simple to fix,
I guess,
Win2K here, I'll apply the patch and let you know what happens.
-Vibol
-Original Message-
From: David S. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vibol Hou; Linux-Kernel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under
It looks like the patch fixed the problem. TCP communications over modem
seems fine now with the same settings that didnt' work earlier.
-Vibol
-Original Message-
From: David S. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vibol
Hi everybody,
I am looking for someone who can sponser to help me make
asian fast ftp mirror, I live in HK, so the server will in HK
The mirror target is China and Hong Kong, I hope someone
will help about this, if you can help me to create this mirror site,
please
Hi,
Is there any chance that RAID volumes would support partitions like the
hard-disk driver in the future? This could be handsome if you try to
program a kernel driver for any of those RAID adapters (e.g. thinking of
those Fasttrack or Highpoint lowcost IDE controllers). A RAID
personality
From: "Tom Sightler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
Hi,
Is it possible to download a drive firmware to a fibre channel
drive (or even a scsi drive) through linux ? I know that on
NT (or 98) they use WNASPI and a utility provided by the
drive manufacturer to download the firmware. I was wondering
if this is possible through linux scsi interface.
On 21-Feb-2001 Martin Mares wrote:
Hello!
Have You tried to use skiplists ?
In 93 I've coded a skiplist based directory access for Minix and it gave
very
interesting performances.
Skiplists have a link-list like performance when linear scanned, and overall
good performance in
Hi!
struct safe_kpointer {
void *kaddr;
unsigned long fingerprint[4];
};
the kernel can validate kaddr by 1) validating the pointer via the master
fingerprint (every valid kernel pointer must point to a structure that
starts with the master
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:05:33AM -0300, Rogerio Brito wrote:
On Feb 21 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:15:02PM -0800, Shane Wegner wrote:
Ok, can I still use -u1 -k1 -c1 on the drives or is it even
necessary anymore.
If you enable automatic DMA in the kernel
Hello!
Have You tried to use skiplists ?
In 93 I've coded a skiplist based directory access for Minix and it gave very
interesting performances.
Skiplists have a link-list like performance when linear scanned, and overall
good performance in insertion/seek/delete.
Skip list
Hi!
And no, I don't actually hink that sendfile() is all that hot. It was
_very_ easy to implement, and can be considered a 5-minute hack to give
a feature that fit very well in the MM architecture, and that the Apache
folks had already been using on other architectures.
The current
Hi!
--
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Free Software advocate
This message is copyright 2001, all rights reserved.
Views expressed are my own, not necessarily shared by my employer.
Hello!
To have O(1) you've to have the number of hash entries number of files and a
really good hasing function.
No, if you enlarge the hash table twice (and re-hash everything) every time the
table fills up, the load factor of the table keeps small and everything is O(1)
amortized, of
Since I had some trouble finding any porting info from 2.2 to 2.4, I
wrote up a small amount of research I did on porting FSDs in hope that
someone else might find it useful.. it can be found here:
http://www.cryptofreak.org/projects/port/port-fs-2.4.html
I'd also be grateful for any help, re:
On 21-Feb-2001 Martin Mares wrote:
Hello!
To have O(1) you've to have the number of hash entries number of files and
a
really good hasing function.
No, if you enlarge the hash table twice (and re-hash everything) every time
the
table fills up, the load factor of the table keeps small
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Dropping packets under load will make tcp do the right thing. You don't need
complex mathematical models since dropping frames under load is just another
form of congestion and tcp handles it pretty sanely
Alan: thanks for your
Alan Cox writes:
Dave - any ideas, shall we back it out and work on it for 2.2.20 ?
The one change which is probably causing this is non-critical,
so let me study things quickly tonight and if I come up with
nothing I'll show you what you can revert safely.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL
On Wednesday February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any chance that RAID volumes would support partitions like the
hard-disk driver in the future?
Yep.
See: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux/2.4.2-pre4/
You would need patches H,I,N,O,P,Q,R, and you should
Martin Mares wrote:
Hello!
You're right. However, for each hash table operation to be O(1) the size
of the hash table must be n.
If we are talking about average case complexity (which is the only possibility
with fixed hash function and arbitrary input keys), it suffices to have
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:47:21 -0300 (ARST),
Alberto Bertogli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kernel panic: Attemped to kill the idle task!
In idle task - not syncing
This last line doesn't appear on the ksymoops report, i really dont know why it
insists on cutting it.
Because it has nothing to do
1 - 100 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
