Doh. I feel like a moron. Thanks.. will do...
--S
Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> Seth Goldberg wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I implemented a small check loop at the end of the fast_page_copy
> > routine in mmx.c for the Athlon. Booting the resulting kernel
> > yields an interesting result. Every
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:22:53AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> I don't know whether it will (a) compile, or (b) work... I don't have an alpha
> to play with.
Neither (a) nor (b) ;-) Corrected asm-alpha/rwsem.h attached.
Also small fix for lib/rwsem.c -- RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS-RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
Michael K. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >I have som problem with my realtek 8139 clone. It won't work with
> >dhcp against my isp. [...]
> >
> >Determining IP configuration... Operation failed.
>
> This sounds more like pump failing to negotiate dhcp properly than
> like a failure in
"Michael K. Johnson" wrote:
>
> In linux-kernel, you wrote:
> >I have som problem with my realtek 8139 clone. It won't work with dhcp
> >against my isp. I've just installed redhat 7.1 on a i386 with to (exactly
> >the same) network cards, one that should be connected to my isp, and one
> >to
>
Hello!
This oops happens when I run "rmmod cdrom" on a 2.4.4-ac4 kernel with
CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled. It doesn't happen if CONFIG_SYSCTL is disabled.
Full .config is here:
http://www.red-bean.com/~proski/linux/config
sr_mod isn't loaded at this point. Reference to sd_mod looks weird. After
this
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There are a couple of options here.
> > 1) read the MTRRs unless the BIOS is braindead it will set up that area as
> >write-back. At any rate we shouldn't ever try to allocate a pci region
> >that is write-back cached.
>
> 'unless the BIOS is
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Todd Inglett wrote:
> Ok, I've got this isolated. Here's the sequence of events:
>
> 1. Some process T (probably "top") opens /proc/N/stat.
> 2. While holding tasklist_lock the proc code does a get_task_struct()
> to add a ref count to the page.
> 3. Process N exits.
>
"Matt D. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like around 2.3.30 or so, someone added the call
> disable_local_APIC() to smp_send_stop(). I'm not sure what the
> intention was, but I'm getting some strange behavior as a result
> based on some code I'm writing.
>
> Basically, I'm
I followed the link and read the article. I am glad you sent the link. I
am glad to see the Linux kernel doing so well. Does anyone else have any
Linux Kernel benchmark related links that are interesting?
Thank You,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Rothwell" <[EMAIL
Solved. Disregard. I didn't have serial console support compiled in.
Nick Papadonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I compiled the Linux kernel v2.4.4 and can't get 'console=ttyS0,115200
> console=tty0' to work. This appended line works fine when I boot
> into my 2.2.x series kernel.
>
>
> There are a couple of options here.
> 1) read the MTRRs unless the BIOS is braindead it will set up that area as
>write-back. At any rate we shouldn't ever try to allocate a pci region
>that is write-back cached.
'unless the BIOS is braindead'. Right. We only got into this problem
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I suspect it would be safe to round up to the next megabyte, possibly up
> > to 64MB or so. But much more would make me nervous.
> > Any suggestions?
>
> I'd go for 1MByte simply because I've not seen an EBDA/NVRAM area that large
> stuck at the top of
>
>
> What kind of file was it close()ing?
> - jim
Ah, good question. I should have specified this. It is a socket that is
being closed, not a regular file (the socket has nonblocking set).
> p.s. Are you familiar with the strace(1) utility? It might help you get
> more information the next
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:56:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Or you can rewrite block_read/write to use the page cache, in which case
> you'd have more luck doing the above.
once block_dev is in pagecache there will obviously be no-way to share
cache between the block device and the filesystem,
Hi,
Below is the comment section from my SYSENTER module. Code itself (~20K)
can be found at the URL below. I want to point out that I'm not
subscribed to the linux-kernel list and would appreciate if you drop me
a CC when (or if:-) commenting.
http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/sysenter.c
In linux-kernel, you wrote:
>I have som problem with my realtek 8139 clone. It won't work with dhcp
>against my isp. I've just installed redhat 7.1 on a i386 with to (exactly
>the same) network cards, one that should be connected to my isp, and one
>to
>the local network. My local network works
Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> ...
>
> If told to hold a reservation, then resend your reservation request once every
> 2 seconds (this actually has very minimal CPU/BUS usage and isn't as big a
> deal as requesting a reservation every 2 seconds might sound). The first time
> the reservation is
Hi,
We have a server which runs on a machine that now runs the new 2.4 kernel.
Since upgrading we've seen periods where it seems to just hang for minutes
at a time (anywhere form 5 minutes to an hour). I was finally able to get
a core dump of the server during one of these periods and it appears
At 12:30 AM -0700 2001-05-04, David S. Miller wrote:
>Abramo Bagnara writes:
> > it's perfectly fine to have:
> >
> > regs = (struct reg *) ioremap(addr, size);
> > foo = readl((unsigned long)>bar);
> >
>
>I don't see how one can find this valid compared to my preference of
>just plain
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:15:28PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> However, there are 3 reasons why I prefer 16-bit counters:
I assume you mean 32bit counter. (that gives max 2^16 sleepers)
> a. "max user processes" ulimit is much lower than 64K anyway;
the 2^16 limit is not a per-user limit
Hi,
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:46:43PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> For a read only case, the only important
> thing is not to die, one occurrence of bad data is tolerable.
Strong NACK. The pages where the bad data comes from may in some cases
already be reclaimed for other data, probably
In message <01050413055100.00907@golmepha> you write:
> Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> > There are two cases where the substitution is problematic:
>
> Yes, but...
>
> The cases which my patch modifies are of a different kind:
The very first hunk of your patch is
expand_stack is only protected with down_read(_sem), and thus 2
thread could grow a vma at the same time.
I think the spin_lock(_table_lock) should be moved up before the
calculation of grow.
And map_user_kiobuf() doesn't honor VM_LOCKED for VM_GROWSDOWN segments.
Probably it should be switched
I compiled the Linux kernel v2.4.4 and can't get 'console=ttyS0,115200
console=tty0' to work. This appended line works fine when I boot
into my 2.2.x series kernel.
Anyone have similar problems? Has anyone verified serial console
output works with the 2.4.x kernels? Thanks.
- Nick
Here is
At 22:29 03/05/01, Anders Karlsson wrote:
>I am not subscribed to the list, so if I could be CC'd on eventual
>replies I would be grateful.
Sure.
>I have a question regarding some of the parts of the overall
>filesystem structure in the 2.4 kernel. (Kernel 2.4.[34].)
>In the file fs/super.c the
> is to find out why this copy is not working properly...
>
> For me the output is:
>
> ...
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 188k freed
> Kernel panic: fast_page_copy: dest value @ 0xcfed1000 (39312036) does
> not equal source value @ cfed4000(79005b)!
Swap the panic for a printk/BUG() and
This patch fixes two bugs in the mct_u232 driver when used
with the Sitecom U232-P25 device:
- baud calculation (already posted two days ago) was wrong,
making it impossible to be used with a fixed baud rate device
- the maximum output packet size as reported by the
On Tuesday, May 01, 2001 04:57:02 PM -0600 Andreas Dilger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin writes:
>> Not correct, there can't be more than 2^15 *directories* in a single
>> directory. I belive this is an ext2 limitation.
>
>
> I see that reiserfs plays some tricks with the
There seems to be a contingent of people on the LKML who think that it
is appropriate to flame people off-list, in order to bask in their own
superiority, or prove that they are smarter by pointing out that someone
is an idiot, etc. I would figure that most intelligent people would
simply ignore
Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> |> On Fri, 04 May 2001 07:34:20 -0500,
> |> Todd Inglett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |> >But this is where hell breaks loose. Every process has a valid parent
> |> >-- unless it is dead and nobody cares. Process N has
Hi Jacek,
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> I'm not in the list, please cc your replies to me.
> After upgrading to 2.4.4 I started using tmpfs for /tmp and I
> noticed a strange behavior:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=blah bs=1024 count=102400
> # increased my used swap space by
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> On Fri, 04 May 2001 07:34:20 -0500,
|> Todd Inglett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> >But this is where hell breaks loose. Every process has a valid parent
|> >-- unless it is dead and nobody cares. Process N has already exited and
|> >released from the
Seth Goldberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I implemented a small check loop at the end of the fast_page_copy
> routine in mmx.c for the Athlon. Booting the resulting kernel
> yields an interesting result. Every single time, the kernel
> panics RIGHT AFTER it frees unused kernel memory from bootup.
> I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Looks like if you remove the "inline" from the function definition
> this compiles OK.
Yup, looks like a compiler bug. I submitted a bug report to GCC-gnats.
Cheers,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
I am trying to mmap() into user space a kernel buffer and am having
problems.
I have a simple test example, can someone please tell me what I have got
wrong ?
In a driver I do:
uint*kva;
kva = (uint*)kmalloc(4096, GFP_KERNEL);
*kva = 0x11223344;
printk("Address: %p %lx
On Fri, 04 May 2001 07:34:20 -0500,
Todd Inglett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But this is where hell breaks loose. Every process has a valid parent
>-- unless it is dead and nobody cares. Process N has already exited and
>released from the tasklist while its parent was still alive. There was
"Martin.Knoblauch" wrote:
>
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > my DE-620 pccard stopped working after upgrading the kernel from
> > > 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4. This is on a Toshiba 4080XCDT. I used the "good"
> > > .config from the 2.4.3-ac7 build to do a make "oldconfig". The symptoms
> > > at startup are:
On Fri, 04 May 2001 13:37:08 +0200,
Nico Schottelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have searched a long time for a method to disable the internal
>speaker for every application, every daemon and so on.
Userspace problem, userspace fix.
setterm -blength 0 (text)
xset b 0 (X11)
-
To
Hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:03:39AM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> unresponsive. The relevant line in the log, as you can find in the attached
> "crash.log" file, appears to be:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00020024
> Apr 16 11:23:06 dave kernel: esi:
Ok, I've got this isolated. Here's the sequence of events:
1. Some process T (probably "top") opens /proc/N/stat.
2. While holding tasklist_lock the proc code does a get_task_struct()
to add a ref count to the page.
3. Process N exits.
4. The parent of process N exits.
5. Process T reads
Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> during boot. I can then reshuffle my disk to have that 50M of data at
> the beginning and reading all that into 50M of cache, I can save
Wasn't that one of the goals of the LVM project, along snapshots and
block-level HSM ?
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, May 04 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Ditto for some CD based stuff. You burn the important binaries to the front
> > > of the CD, then at boot dd 64Mb to /dev/null to prime the libraries and
> > > avoid a lot of seeking during boot up from the
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> I have searched a long time for a method to disable the internal
> speaker for every application, every daemon and so on.
It would be cool if that weren't a compile time option but configurable at
runtime (via sysctl).
Simon
--
GPG public key
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ditto for some CD based stuff. You burn the important binaries to the front
> > of the CD, then at boot dd 64Mb to /dev/null to prime the libraries and
> > avoid a lot of seeking during boot up from the CD-ROM.
> >
> > However I
Hi guys!
I have searched a long time for a method to disable the internal
speaker for every application, every daemon and so on.
With the help of [] I have found the right file :
drivers/char/vt.c
Now I have made some changes to this file (from 2.4.4 kernel).
I wanted to ask you whether you
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > Obvious one is to go to the next power of two clear.
>
> The question is mainly _which_ power of two.
>
> I don't think we can round up infinitely, as that might just end up
> causing us to not have any PCI space at all.
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 02:57 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> In message <01050120580701.01713@golmepha> you write:
> > Hello,
Hi!
> >
> > the patch at the bottom does the bulk job of strtok replacement. It's a
> > very boring patch, containing easy cases, only. It became a bit big, too,
> > but I
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Abramo Bagnara writes:
> > it's perfectly fine to have:
> >
> > regs = (struct reg *) ioremap(addr, size);
> > foo = readl((unsigned long)>bar);
> >
>
> I don't see how one can find this valid compared to my preference of
> just plain readl(>bar); You're
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > my DE-620 pccard stopped working after upgrading the kernel from
> > 2.4.3-ac7 to 2.4.4. This is on a Toshiba 4080XCDT. I used the "good"
> > .config from the 2.4.3-ac7 build to do a make "oldconfig". The symptoms
> > at startup are:
>
> 2.4.4 has older pcmcia than
Hello. 8-)
I'm not in the list, please cc your replies to me.
After upgrading to 2.4.4 I started using tmpfs for /tmp and I
noticed a strange behavior:
dd if=/dev/zero of=blah bs=1024 count=102400
# increased my used swap space by approx. 100MiB (correct)
rm blah
# did not
Hi,
I implemented a small check loop at the end of the fast_page_copy
routine in mmx.c for the Athlon. Booting the resulting kernel
yields an interesting result. Every single time, the kernel
panics RIGHT AFTER it frees unused kernel memory from bootup.
I encourage those of you with the same
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:22:53AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Hello Ivan,
Hello David!
> I don't know whether it will (a) compile, or (b) work... I don't have an alpha
> to play with.
It looks ok at a first glance, I can try it today.
> I also don't know the alpha function calling
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:27:50PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> My guess is that your CDROM drive takes longer than most to perform
> the initial read capacity. There is little to be done for this other
> than uping the timeout value in the CD driver.
It was a hardware issue indeed - an
Hello Ivan,
One reason I picked "signed long" as the count type in the lib/rwsem.c is that
this would be 64 bits on a 64-bit arch such as the alpha.
So I've taken your idea for include/asm-alpha/rwsem.h and modified it a
little. You'll find it attached at the bottom.
I don't know whether it
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:28:48PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I'd love if you could port it on top of this one and to fix it so that
> it can handle up to 2^32 sleepers and not only 2^16 like we have to do
> on the 32bit archs to get good performance:
>
>
Is it ok for an Promise Ultra 100 to have both channels
assigned the same IRQ?
I have one DTLA-307030 attached as master to each channel
and get transfer rates at around 12 - 16 MB/s.
As I have heard people reporting transfer rates of about 24 - 28 MB/s
I was wondering if there were some
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>> Short version:
>> Under very heavy thrashing (about four hours) the system either lockups
>> or OOM handler kills a task even when there is swap space left.
>
>
> First of all, please try to reproduce the problem with
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Finally I found some time to incorporate the very nice logos contributed by
> Simon Budig. Thank you Simon!
>
> Patches (for both 2.4.5-pre1 and 2.4.4-ac4) can be downloaded from:
>
> http://home.tvd.be/cr26864/Linux/fbdev/logo.html
Sorry, I
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> If they are using glibc then you have the right to the object to link
> with the library and the library source under the LGPL. I dont know of any
> app using its own C lib
qmail is nearly there.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com
Hi,
Do you think it would be a good idea to check the fast_copy
athlon mmx routine by putting in code that basically compares
the source & destination copies and checks if they are equal?
I realize that will slow down the system, but for testing,
it seems like a good idea...
--S
-
To
Hi,
I have som problem with my realtek 8139 clone. It won't work with dhcp
against my isp. I've just installed redhat 7.1 on a i386 with to (exactly
the same) network cards, one that should be connected to my isp, and one
to
the local network. My local network works fine, but when I try to start
Fabio,
i noticed another RFC anomaly in X15. It ignores the "Connection: close"
request header passed by a HTTP/1.1 client. This behavior is against RFC
2616, a server must not override the client's choice of non-persistent
connection. (there might be HTTP/1.1 clients that do not support
Gordon Sadler wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:43:22AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
> > Hi,
Hi,
Have you tried compiling ther kernel with Athlon optimiztions turned
off (try
compiling for a K6-II[I])? The has stopped the same thing from
happening on
my system and those of a few other
---Reply to mail from Venkatesh Ramamurthy about Solution - AMI megaraid driver
doesn't work with Linux 2.4.x kernels
> Can you provide the dmesg output of your system after loading the driver
> either successfully or unsucessfully.
>
Successfully: (Raid 5 4x18GB)
Hi!
> > I was looking over the iso9660 code, and noticed that it was doing
> > endianness conversion via ad hoc *functions*, not even inlines; nor did
> > it take any advantage of the fact that iso9660 is bi-endian (has "all"
> > data in both bigendian and littleendian format.)
> >
> > The
Hi!
> > > That means that for fooling closed-source statically-linked binary,
> >
> > If they are using glibc then you have the right to the object to link
> > with the library and the library source under the LGPL. I dont know of any
> > app using its own C lib
>
> Some don't use any libc at
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:43:22AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
>What hardware are you running?
>
AMD Duron 800
Epox 8KTA3 m/b
VIA KT133A AGPSet (KT133A+VT82C686B)
128 MB pc100 brandname SDRAM
Inter etherexpress100
Nvidia Riva TNT (orig.)
Quantum FB LP LM20.5
Full details available
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:46:13PM +0800, Yiping Chen wrote:
> I want to contact with the author of linux kernel.
> Anybody knows how to contact with them?
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" list is quite good way for that.
> Our leader hope put our own driver into linux kernel.
> I am not sure whether
Albert D. Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Procedure:
>
> 1. throw out all junk symbols (could try spell checking first)
> 2. mark non-default settings as read-only
> 3. add missing symbols as needed to meet constraints
> 4. add any additional missing symbols
> 5. mutate the config until it
Hi,
What hardware are you running?
--seth
>
> Please CC any replies.
> Please refer to my previous post 'PROBLEM: 2.4.4 oops, will not boot'
> for complete machine details/configuration.
>
> I'm still working on different 2.4 kernels trying to get just one to
> boot normally.
On 2001.05.04 03:20:46 +0200 Miles Lane wrote:
> Prepared Text of Remarks by Craig Mundie, Microsoft Senior Vice
> President
> The Commercial Software Model
> The New York University Stern School of Business
> May 3, 2001
For the people who missed it, Alan Cox' response is at:
Abramo Bagnara writes:
> it's perfectly fine to have:
>
> regs = (struct reg *) ioremap(addr, size);
> foo = readl((unsigned long)>bar);
>
I don't see how one can find this valid compared to my preference of
just plain readl(>bar); You're telling me it's nicer to have the
butt ugly cast
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Abramo Bagnara writes:
> > IMO this is a far less effective debugging strategy.
>
> I agree with you.
>
> But guess what driver authors are going to do? They are going to cast
> the thing left and right. And sure you can then search for that, but
> it isn't
Please CC any replies.
Please refer to my previous post 'PROBLEM: 2.4.4 oops, will not boot'
for complete machine details/configuration.
I'm still working on different 2.4 kernels trying to get just one to
boot normally. Currently I've removed all modules and built everything
into the kernel,
Hello,
Many thanks for a very good and solid piece of software in the Linux
kernel. It has been very useful to me for several years now.
I am not subscribed to the list, so if I could be CC'd on eventual
replies I would be grateful.
I have a question regarding some of the parts of the overall
Should I be worried about these?
May 4 08:09:29 middle kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz.
May 4 08:09:38 middle last message repeated 2 times
May 4 08:09:56 middle kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
May 4 08:10:05 middle kernel: [drm:mga_flush_ioctl] *ERROR* lock not held
One of our customers has a Fujitsu laptop, poor thing...
It shares IRQ10 between Eepro, additional IDE for CD-ROM (CMD646),
and USB controllers. I talked this over with DaveM briefly,
and if I understood him right, something like the attached
patch may be in order. Anyone cares to comment?
Thank
One of our customers has a Fujitsu laptop, poor thing...
It shares IRQ10 between Eepro, additional IDE for CD-ROM (CMD646),
and USB controllers. I talked this over with DaveM briefly,
and if I understood him right, something like the attached
patch may be in order. Anyone cares to comment?
Thank
Should I be worried about these?
May 4 08:09:29 middle kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz.
May 4 08:09:38 middle last message repeated 2 times
May 4 08:09:56 middle kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
May 4 08:10:05 middle kernel: [drm:mga_flush_ioctl] *ERROR* lock not held
Hello,
Many thanks for a very good and solid piece of software in the Linux
kernel. It has been very useful to me for several years now.
I am not subscribed to the list, so if I could be CC'd on eventual
replies I would be grateful.
I have a question regarding some of the parts of the overall
Please CC any replies.
Please refer to my previous post 'PROBLEM: 2.4.4 oops, will not boot'
for complete machine details/configuration.
I'm still working on different 2.4 kernels trying to get just one to
boot normally. Currently I've removed all modules and built everything
into the kernel,
On 2001.05.04 03:20:46 +0200 Miles Lane wrote:
Prepared Text of Remarks by Craig Mundie, Microsoft Senior Vice
President
The Commercial Software Model
The New York University Stern School of Business
May 3, 2001
For the people who missed it, Alan Cox' response is at:
Hi,
What hardware are you running?
--seth
Please CC any replies.
Please refer to my previous post 'PROBLEM: 2.4.4 oops, will not boot'
for complete machine details/configuration.
I'm still working on different 2.4 kernels trying to get just one to
boot normally. Currently I've
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:46:13PM +0800, Yiping Chen wrote:
I want to contact with the author of linux kernel.
Anybody knows how to contact with them?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list is quite good way for that.
Our leader hope put our own driver into linux kernel.
I am not sure whether it was
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:43:22AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
What hardware are you running?
AMD Duron 800
Epox 8KTA3 m/b
VIA KT133A AGPSet (KT133A+VT82C686B)
128 MB pc100 brandname SDRAM
Inter etherexpress100
Nvidia Riva TNT (orig.)
Quantum FB LP LM20.5
Full details available in
Hi!
That means that for fooling closed-source statically-linked binary,
If they are using glibc then you have the right to the object to link
with the library and the library source under the LGPL. I dont know of any
app using its own C lib
Some don't use any libc at all, some
Hi!
I was looking over the iso9660 code, and noticed that it was doing
endianness conversion via ad hoc *functions*, not even inlines; nor did
it take any advantage of the fact that iso9660 is bi-endian (has all
data in both bigendian and littleendian format.)
The attached patch
---Reply to mail from Venkatesh Ramamurthy about Solution - AMI megaraid driver
doesn't work with Linux 2.4.x kernels
Can you provide the dmesg output of your system after loading the driver
either successfully or unsucessfully.
Successfully: (Raid 5 4x18GB)
Gordon Sadler wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:43:22AM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Have you tried compiling ther kernel with Athlon optimiztions turned
off (try
compiling for a K6-II[I])? The has stopped the same thing from
happening on
my system and those of a few other people.
Fabio,
i noticed another RFC anomaly in X15. It ignores the Connection: close
request header passed by a HTTP/1.1 client. This behavior is against RFC
2616, a server must not override the client's choice of non-persistent
connection. (there might be HTTP/1.1 clients that do not support
Hi,
I have som problem with my realtek 8139 clone. It won't work with dhcp
against my isp. I've just installed redhat 7.1 on a i386 with to (exactly
the same) network cards, one that should be connected to my isp, and one
to
the local network. My local network works fine, but when I try to start
Hi,
Do you think it would be a good idea to check the fast_copy
athlon mmx routine by putting in code that basically compares
the source destination copies and checks if they are equal?
I realize that will slow down the system, but for testing,
it seems like a good idea...
--S
-
To
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Finally I found some time to incorporate the very nice logos contributed by
Simon Budig. Thank you Simon!
Patches (for both 2.4.5-pre1 and 2.4.4-ac4) can be downloaded from:
http://home.tvd.be/cr26864/Linux/fbdev/logo.html
Sorry, I had
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
If they are using glibc then you have the right to the object to link
with the library and the library source under the LGPL. I dont know of any
app using its own C lib
qmail is nearly there.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jorge Nerin wrote:
Short version:
Under very heavy thrashing (about four hours) the system either lockups
or OOM handler kills a task even when there is swap space left.
First of all, please try to reproduce the problem with 2.4.5-pre1.
Is it ok for an Promise Ultra 100 to have both channels
assigned the same IRQ?
I have one DTLA-307030 attached as master to each channel
and get transfer rates at around 12 - 16 MB/s.
As I have heard people reporting transfer rates of about 24 - 28 MB/s
I was wondering if there were some
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:28:48PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
I'd love if you could port it on top of this one and to fix it so that
it can handle up to 2^32 sleepers and not only 2^16 like we have to do
on the 32bit archs to get good performance:
Hello Ivan,
One reason I picked signed long as the count type in the lib/rwsem.c is that
this would be 64 bits on a 64-bit arch such as the alpha.
So I've taken your idea for include/asm-alpha/rwsem.h and modified it a
little. You'll find it attached at the bottom.
I don't know whether it will
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:27:50PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
My guess is that your CDROM drive takes longer than most to perform
the initial read capacity. There is little to be done for this other
than uping the timeout value in the CD driver.
It was a hardware issue indeed - an upgrade
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:22:53AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
Hello Ivan,
Hello David!
I don't know whether it will (a) compile, or (b) work... I don't have an alpha
to play with.
It looks ok at a first glance, I can try it today.
I also don't know the alpha function calling convention,
101 - 200 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
