Paul Mackerras writes:
The only valid reason for userspace programs to be including kernel
headers is to get definitions that are part of the kernel API. (And
in fact others here will go further and assert that there are *no*
valid reasons for userspace programs to include kernel headers.)
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 11:08:04PM -0700, Alan Olsen wrote:
The basic effect is that the kernel will not load. Something breaks hard
in it.
Any clue on what the last thing printed to the kernel log is?
Hardware you have?
.config for the kernel?
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 09:42:26PM -0400, Russell Leighton wrote:
I also need some 2.4 features and can't really goto 2.2.
I would have to agree that the VM is too broken for production...looking
forward to the work that (hopefully) will be in 2.4.6 to resolve these issues.
Boring to do a
I have performance problems with a CUV4X-DLS (VIA-694XDP) dual
processor motherboard. It's a web server. vmstat shows it
does 1-15000 context switches/s and load average stays
aroung 20 all the time. I tried two other machines (a VAlinux UP
and supermicro MP) with the same load, memory, SCSI
On a side question: does Linux support swap-files in addition to
sawp-partitions? Even if that has a performance penalty, when the system
is swapping performance is dead anyway.
Yes. Simply use mkswap and swapon/off on a regular file instead of a
partition device. I don't notice any
It seems bizarre that a 4GB machine with a working set _far_ lower than that
should be dying from OOM and swapping itself to death, but that's life in 2.4
land.
I posted a fix for the OOM problem long ago, and it didn't get integrated
(even after I sent Alan a separated-out version from the
Vincent Stemen wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2001 02:36, Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear folks,
I made 18 ext2 cdroms in October 1998 using an old (new at the time) Red
Hat system. Now I can't mount them. e2fsck shows no problems. I also
can dd them to a file, then mount the file. But I want
I noticed this article on ZDNet and wondered if any of the kernel
developers might be able to get a prototype motherboard from NVidia
in order to do early support work for this new chipset. It sounds
like pretty interesting technology.
---
Nvidia takes a crack at PCs
By Ian
On 05 Jun 2001 16:51:13 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
that would fix it too indeed, OTOH I think changing the empty zone
handling in the kernel is beyond the scope of the bugfix (grep for
zone-size in mm/*.c :). Certainly making empty zones
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
user-space program is still running. I need to remove the user-space
mapping -- otherwise the user process would still have access to the
now-freed pages. I need an inverse of remap_page_range().
That seems a bit perverse.
On 05 Jun 2001 23:19:08 -0400, Derek Glidden wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Because the 2.4 VM is so broken, and
because my machines are frequently deeply swapped,
The swapoff algorithms in 2.2 and 2.4 are basically
Hi,
I want to know if someone know where found info about RSVP suuport on
linux.
Is it full supported by linux ?
Thanks
sebastien person
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
There are 2 tests.
TEST 1.
Both IP and IPX does not work with 2.4.5 kernel on DEC 24041
chipset card (CNet 935E).
I compile and try 2.4.5, 2.4.4-ac8-xfs-kdb and 2.4.5-ac8.
In all cases system does not see Netware server (NW5.0 sp3) in
ipx net and can't operate IP.
In 2.4.4 kernet all is
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:19:30AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On 05 Jun 2001 23:19:08 -0400, Derek Glidden wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Because the 2.4 VM is so broken, and
because my machines are frequently
Hi!
I got this while compiling kernel over NFS.
pavel@bug:/usr/src/linux-acpi$ time make bzImage
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/elf/big/linux-acpi/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing
-pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -DUTS_MACHINE='i386'
-c
Hi!
I got this while compiling kernel over NFS.
pavel@bug:/usr/src/linux-acpi$ time make bzImage
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/elf/big/linux-acpi/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing
-pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -DUTS_MACHINE='i386'
-c -o
John Chris Wren schrieb:
I don't really want to write a full-up kernel mode driver for this device,
but interrupt type messages are the preferred method for communicating,
since once a message needs to be sent, it should be timely (whereas control
messages could be delayed a
On a side question: does Linux support swap-files in addition to
sawp-partitions? Even if that has a performance penalty, when the system
is swapping performance is dead anyway.
Yes.
A possible solution could be:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/swap bs=1M count=whatever you like in MB
mkswap /swap
On 06 Jun 2001 09:54:31 +0100, Sean Hunter wrote:
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying that
anything less won't do any good: 2.4 overallocates swap even if it
doesn't use it all. So in your case you just have enough swap to map
your RAM, and nothing to really
Hi!
What I did was: add a field `char *mnt_symlink_prefix;' to the
struct vfsmount, fill it in super.c:add_vfsmnt(), use it in
namei.c:vfs_follow_link(). Pick the value up by recognizing
in super.c:do_mount() the option symlink_prefix= before
giving the options to the separate
Alan Cox schrieb:
2.4.5-ac9
o Add es1371 sound driver locking (Frank Davis)
Looks bogus. Independent processes can open the same device
once for reading and once for writing, now you are serializing
needlessly these processes. Please revert.
Tom
-
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:16:27AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On 06 Jun 2001 09:54:31 +0100, Sean Hunter wrote:
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying that
anything less won't do any good: 2.4 overallocates swap even if it
doesn't use it all. So in your case
Hi list,
I try to set up IDE-Support for ARM-Integrator with an PDC20268.
This controller is currently not supported in
linux/drivers/ide/pdc202xx.c
It is possible to define this controller with the same behavior as
PDC20267 in linux/drivers/ide/pdc202xx.c?
Because the ARM-Integrator is not
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap?
Do I understand you correctly?
ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB server costs £335 per GB as 512MB sticks even
at today's silly prices (Crucial). Ultra160 SCSI costs £8.93/GB as 73GB
I am waiting patiently for the bug to be fixed. However, it is a real
embarrasment that we can't run this stable kernel in production yet
because somethign as fundamental as this is so badly broken.
Rest assured that a fix is in the works. I'm already seeing a big
improvement in behaviour on my
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap?
Do I understand you correctly?
ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB server costs £335 per GB as 512MB sticks even
at today's silly prices
What happens if the box is full of disk capacity and you cannot add anymore
spindles?
Then what?
Upgrade the whole disk subsystem just to cater for this issue? That would
turn out to be a bit more expensive in both money terms and downtime/labour
costs.
It really annoys me when people just say
Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap?
Do I understand you correctly?
ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB server costs £335 per GB as 512MB
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap?
Do I understand you correctly?
ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB server costs £335 per GB as 512MB sticks even
at
Hi,
it seems the Configure.help text for CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE
is incorrect: The default is to stall until the printer
is ready while the help text says the opposite.
(vi +540 drivers/char/lp.c)
Attached is a patch for 2.4.6-pre1 which fixes the help text.
Also, shouldn't CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE depend
Hi kernel-list-readers!
We just had a problem when running some formatting-utils on
a large amount of disks synchronously: We got a NULL-pointer
violation when accessig blk_size[major] for our major number.
Further research showed, that grok_partitions was running at
that time, which has been
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
This is completely bogus. I am not saying that I can't afford the swap.
What I am saying is that it is completely broken to require this amount
of swap given the boundaries of efficient use.
Funny. I can count many ways in which 4.3BSD, SunOS{3,4}
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:24:34PM +0200, Remi Turk wrote:
Attached is a patch for 2.4.6-pre1 which fixes the help text.
Thanks.
Also, shouldn't CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE depend on CONFIG_PRINTER=y? (it
doesn't work when CONFIG_PRINTER=m, at least for me)
It works for me with CONFIG_PRINTER=m.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
2.4.5-ac9
o Add es1371 sound driver locking (Frank Davis)
It's buggy. The locking in -read and -write will give
double ups when a signal is pending and remove a not added waitq
when programming the dmabuf fails.
Christoph
Hi!
If you still have your 3-button MouseSystems (or any other serial) mouse
somewhere in your driver, forgotten becase of the incredibly slow update
rate causing so much jumping of the pointer on the screen that it is
unusable, you may want to pull it out and give it a try.
Or if you're still
Rico Tudor wrote:
Try your test with High Memory Support disabled.
... tried w/o HIGH_MEM support - same result, machine hang-up...
--
Till Immanuel Patzschke mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
interNetwork AG Phone: +49-(0)611-1731-121
Bierstadter Str. 7
On Wednesday 06 June 2001 10:54, Sean Hunter wrote:
Did you try to put twice as much swap as you have RAM ? (e.g. add a
512M swapfile to your box)
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying
that anything less won't do any good: 2.4 overallocates swap even
if it
In 322 lines of code,
[hmm - gzipped, ach]
Including the code in a readable form is much better - many people
would glance at it and perhaps have remarks.
And in those cases where the code is too large to give,
a URL is preferable.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Glenn Shannon wrote:
Hi all!
Enjoying the -ac2 kernel except for one minor thing: it locks up.
As I see below you have a Realtek 8139B...
The 8139too driver in 2.4.3-something to 2.4.5-ac2 is broken. It will hang
your machine. so upgrade to 2.4.5-ac3 or above (2.4.5-ac9
Hi,
I know you are surely overworked, but I am not sure who else may know
enough about this
buffer_head/page cache stuff... Feel free to ingore this if you havn't got
the time.
What I try to do:
Adding multipath support to the LVM. One part of this is to get informed
whenever an IO
completes
Hello,
I'm working on some hi-speed DB projects under Linux and I was researching
various buffer-replacement algorithms. I found 2Q buffer replacement policy at
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/63909.html
Maybe it would be interesting to use it instead of LRU for disk buffer
replacement.
Christoph Hellwig schrieb:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
2.4.5-ac9
o Add es1371 sound driver locking (Frank Davis)
It's buggy. The locking in -read and -write will give
double ups when a signal is pending and remove a not added waitq
when programming
On 05 Jun 2001 18:39:16 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Hi !
I have an ABit VP6 (Dual PIII, infamous VIA686, onboard IDE + onboard
HPT370). This is a new machine, so I didn't test it on several kernels.
Using 2.4.4-ac11 (SMP), it started to deadlock really often when
accessing the new disk
Did you try to put twice as much swap as you have RAM ? (e.g. add a
512M swapfile to your box)
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying
that anything less won't do any good: 2.4 overallocates swap even
if it doesn't use it all. So in your case you just have enough
[ please CC replies to me ]
Perusing the kernel sources while investigating watchdog drivers, I
notice that in some places, Fahrenheit is used, and in some places,
Celsius. It would seem logical to me to have a global config option,
so that you *know* that you talk devices either in F or C.
I
Hi all,
I was testing the kernel support for the LMC1200 interface (E1/T1)
and like specified in the help menu a user land tool is needed to
configure
the interface. But during the compilation time is reporting this error
/usr/include/linux/timer.h:17: field `list' has incomplete type
Jeffrey W. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Derek Glidden wrote:
After reading the messages to this list for the last couple of weeks and
playing around on my machine, I'm convinced that the VM system in 2.4 is
still severely broken.
This isn't trying to test
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Because the 2.4 VM is so broken, and
because my machines are frequently deeply swapped,
The swapoff algorithms in 2.2 and 2.4 are basically identical.
The problem *appears* worse in 2.4 because it uses lots
more swap.
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:41:31PM +0200, Thomas Sailer wrote:
Christoph Hellwig schrieb:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
2.4.5-ac9
o Add es1371 sound driver locking (Frank Davis)
It's buggy. The locking in -read and -write will give
double ups
This is very strange. Does your kernel do the same if you compile IPv6
as module and khttpd off ?
No, the boot proceeds normally. I loaded ipv6 module manually after boot and
ipv6 worked locally also (ping6 ::1). I didn't test network ipv6 (my
personal computer is on an ipv4 network).
On Tue, 05 Jun 2001, Derek Glidden did have cause to say:
The swapoff algorithms in 2.2 and 2.4 are basically identical.
The problem *appears* worse in 2.4 because it uses lots
more swap.
I disagree with the terminology you're using. It *is* worse in 2.4,
period. If it only *appears*
[1.] I/O system call never returns if file desc is closed in the meantime
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
This report describes a problem in the usage of file descriptors across
multiple threads. When one thread closes a file descriptor, another
thread which waits for an I/O on
Hi!
Good evening,
The problem is annoying, the fix is trivial.
I am not subscribed to the list, so PLEASE CC ME when replying.
Your fix looks ok. Can you make it diff -u and submit to linus? [You
may tell him I approved ;-) -- mj is maintainer but he is away]
Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
[snip]
Derek overwhelmed. On the system I'm using to write this, with
Derek 512MB of RAM and 512MB of swap, I run two copies of this
Please see the following message on the kernel mailing list,
3086:Linus 2.4.0 notes are quite clear that you need at least
Xavier Bestel wrote:
Did you try to put twice as much swap as you have RAM ? (e.g. add a 512M
swapfile to your box)
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying that
anything less won't do any good: 2.4 overallocates swap even if it
doesn't use it all. So in your case
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Because the 2.4 VM is so broken, and
because my machines are frequently deeply swapped,
The swapoff algorithms in 2.2 and 2.4 are basically identical.
The problem *appears* worse in 2.4 because it
I've just tried the orinoco_cs driver with my Orinoco Gold pcmcia card in
hopes that I could use this instead of having to rebuild the pcmcia-cs
package everytime I try a new kernel... I am seeing the following messages:
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1: transmit timed out
eth1: Tx timeout! Resetting
Helge Hafting wrote:
The drive is inactive because it isn't needed, the machine is
running loops on data in memory. And it is unresponsive because
nothing else is scheduled, maybe swapoff is easier to implement
I don't quite get what you're saying. If the system becomes
unresponsive
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Yes. The sys_swapoff() system call can take many minutes
Haven't looked at it closely, but I think the algorithm
could become something like:
for (each process) {
for (each page in this process) {
if (page
Daniel Phillips writes:
On Wednesday 06 June 2001 10:54, Sean Hunter wrote:
Did you try to put twice as much swap as you have RAM ? (e.g. add a
512M swapfile to your box)
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying
that anything less won't do any good: 2.4
This morning I was running 2.4.6-pre1 and it locked up hard in
X-windows. The mouse cursor was frozen, and I couldn't ping the box
from another one on the network. The sysrq did work - to an extent. A
tried the 's u b' combination, and although the sync and remount didn't
work (filesystems
Funny. I can count many ways in which 4.3BSD, SunOS{3,4} and post-4.4 BSD
systems I've used were broken, but I've never thought that swap==2*RAM rule
was one of them.
Yes, but Linux isn't 4.3BSD, SunOS or post-4.4 BSD. Not to mention, all
other OS's I've had experience using *don't* break
OK, Linus said if I use swap it should be at least twice as much as RAM.
there will be much more discussion about it, for me this contraint is a very
very bad idea.
Have you ever thought about diskless workstations? Swapping over a network
sounds ugly.
Nevertheless, my question is:
what happens
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:31:28 -0400, Derek Glidden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to be amazed at the Linux VM hackers' attitudes regarding
this problem. I expect this sort of behaviour from academics - ignoring
real actual problems being reported by real actual people really and
I'm sorry but this is a regression, plain and simple.
Previous versons of Linux have worked great on diskless workstations
with NO swap.
Swap is extra space to be used if we have it and nothing else.
--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024|
MandrakeSoft |
-
John Alvord wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:31:28 -0400, Derek Glidden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to be amazed at the Linux VM hackers' attitudes regarding
this problem. I expect this sort of behaviour from academics - ignoring
real actual problems being reported by real
james == James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
james Not many people have seen this, but the i_bdev field in fake_inode in
james ioctl_by_bdev() is uninitialised. Since this field is dereferenced by
james BLKFLSBUF in rd_ioctl, it can lead to a panic (depending on what happens to be
Hi,
Please, don't.
Use kelvins *0.1, and use them consistently everywhere. This is what
ACPI does, and it is probably right.
I'm sorry, by I don't feel like adding 273 to every number I get just to
find the temperature of something. What I would do is give configuration
options to choose
Jeff Garzik writes:
I'm sorry but this is a regression, plain and simple.
Previous versons of Linux have worked great on diskless workstations
with NO swap.
Swap is extra space to be used if we have it and nothing else.
Sure. But Linux still works without swap. It's just that if you
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Chris Boot wrote:
I'm sorry, by I don't feel like adding 273 to every number I get just to
find the temperature of something. What I would do is give configuration
options to choose the default (Celsius/centigrade, Kelvin, or [shudder]
Fahrenheit) then, when you need to
Is it possible to move serio.c and serport.c up into drivers/char. I'm
finding many drivers that use this and it is a mess to have to enable
joysticks just to use other types of devices like touchscreens.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Richard Gooch wrote:
Jeff Garzik writes:
I'm sorry but this is a regression, plain and simple.
Previous versons of Linux have worked great on diskless workstations
with NO swap.
Swap is extra space to be used if we have it and nothing else.
Sure. But Linux still works without
Jeff Garzik writes:
Richard Gooch wrote:
Jeff Garzik writes:
I'm sorry but this is a regression, plain and simple.
Previous versons of Linux have worked great on diskless workstations
with NO swap.
Swap is extra space to be used if we have it and nothing else.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:10:02PM +0100, Adrian Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
data corruption was easily detectable, one couldn't even write 500megs
without altered bytes).
Wrong way round. You're right that the pci master is supposed to handle
delayed transactions, but during data
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:57:51AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
/etc/hosts (or anywhere). As a tesult, startx hung starting X server; it was
not possible to switch to alpha console or kill X server. I pressed reset
and after reboot looked into /var/log/XFree86*log - and there were a
hmmm. I just looked over this, and drivers/char/joystick/ser*.[ch].
Bad trend.
Serial needs to be treated just like parport: the basic hardware code,
then on top of that, a selection of drivers, all peers: dumb serial
port, serial mouse, joystick, etc.
--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant
Richard Gooch wrote:
Daniel Phillips writes:
On Wednesday 06 June 2001 10:54, Sean Hunter wrote:
Did you try to put twice as much swap as you have RAM ? (e.g. add a
512M swapfile to your box)
This is what Linus recommended for 2.4 (swap = 2 * RAM), saying
that anything less
On 6 Jun 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Jeffrey W. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Derek Glidden wrote:
After reading the messages to this list for the last couple of weeks and
playing around on my machine, I'm convinced that the VM system in 2.4 is
still
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
If you can afford 4GB RAM, you certainly can afford 8GB swap.
this is a completely crap argument.
you should study the economics of managing a farm of thousands of machines
some day.
when you do this, you'll also learn to consider the power
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:
Jeff Garzik writes:
Richard Gooch wrote:
Jeff Garzik writes:
I'm sorry but this is a regression, plain and simple.
Previous versons of Linux have worked great on diskless workstations
with NO swap.
Swap is extra space
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
This is completely bogus. I am not saying that I can't afford the swap.
What I am saying is that it is completely broken to require this amount
of swap given the boundaries of efficient use.
Funny. I can
Peter == Peter Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Kelvin (decikelvin?) is probably a good unit to use in the
Peter kernel. If you want something else you convert it in the
Peter programs you use to interact with the kernel. This is a
Peter usespace issue, I think.
How about
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:31:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
hmmm. I just looked over this, and drivers/char/joystick/ser*.[ch].
Bad trend.
Serial needs to be treated just like parport: the basic hardware code,
then on top of that, a selection of drivers, all peers: dumb serial
port,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Gooch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Swap is extra space to be used if we have it and nothing else.
Sure. But Linux still works without swap. It's just that if you *do*
have swap, it works best with 2* RAM.
There is a large difference between saying Linux
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 09:17:56AM -0700, James Simmons wrote:
Is it possible to move serio.c and serport.c up into drivers/char. I'm
finding many drivers that use this and it is a mess to have to enable
joysticks just to use other types of devices like touchscreens.
Possible it indeed is.
Hello all,
I have attached patches against the following sound drivers to fix the locking
issues mentioned in Alan's release notes for 2.4.5-ac9 . Please CC me on your comments
to the code (I can address the issues quicker). Thanks.
drivers/sound/esssolo1.c
drivers/sound/maestro.c
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:48:32AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
This is completely bogus. I am not saying that I can't afford the swap.
What I am saying is that it is completely broken to require this amount
of swap given the boundaries of efficient
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap?
Do I understand you correctly?
ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB server costs £335 per GB as 512MB sticks even
at
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:01:58PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:31:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
hmmm. I just looked over this, and drivers/char/joystick/ser*.[ch].
Bad trend.
Serial needs to be treated just like parport: the basic hardware code,
then
2.4.5-ac9
o Fix xircom_cb problems with some cisco kit (Ion Badulescu)
I'm not sure what this is supposed to fix, but it makes my Xircom
RBEM56G-100 almost useless on my network at the office. Actually, I can't
quite blame just this patch, it only makes the problem worse, the driver
from
Frank Davis wrote:
Hello all,
I have attached patches against the following sound drivers to fix the locking
issues mentioned in Alan's release notes for 2.4.5-ac9 . Please CC me on your
comments to the code (I can address the issues quicker). Thanks.
Do these patches have the same
On Wednesday, 06 June 2001, at 18:06:56 +0200,
Chris Boot wrote:
Hi,
Please, don't.
Use kelvins *0.1, and use them consistently everywhere. This is what
ACPI does, and it is probably right.
I'm sorry, by I don't feel like adding 273 to every number I get just to
find the
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
There are two things you can do here, one is easy: use linker tricks to
make sure that an application built on alpha -- with 64-bit pointers --
uses no more than the lower 32 bits of each pointer for addressing.
This should fix a ton of applications
Hi!
Is there any way to read out the compile-time HZ value of the kernel?
Why simply #include asm/param.h?
Tomas
I had a brief look at /proc/* and didn't find anything.
The background, why it is needed:
There are certain settings, for example the icmp rate limiting
On Wednesday, 06 June 2001, at 10:19:30 +0200,
Xavier Bestel wrote:
On 05 Jun 2001 23:19:08 -0400, Derek Glidden wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
Did you try to put twice as much swap as you have RAM ? (e.g. add a 512M
swapfile to your box)
I'm
Derek Glidden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Alvord wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:31:28 -0400, Derek Glidden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to be amazed at the Linux VM hackers' attitudes regarding
this problem. I expect this sort of behaviour from academics - ignoring
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Dr S.M. Huen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
For large memory boxes, this is ridiculous. Should I have 8GB of swap?
Do I understand you correctly?
ECC grade SDRAM for your 8GB
hello,
Is there reason why I can't set pointopoint for ethernet? I have
to computers (and two 100mbps ethernet cards) connected via null-modem
ethernet cable (with no hub in between). So since there's no way
to have more than two hosts talking to each other for
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:09:33PM +0200, Tomas Telensky wrote:
Hi!
Is there any way to read out the compile-time HZ value of the kernel?
Why simply #include asm/param.h?
because the include file doesn't say anything about the HZ value of
the currently running kernel, but only about
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
