On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:36:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Linux version 2.6.10 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian
> 1:3.3.5-8)) #13 SMP Sat Feb 19 20:12:19 EST 2005
> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> BIOS-e820: - 0009f000 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 00
Have you tried it to get it to work without ACPI in the kernel at all, and
start from there?
Best regards,
Norbert
On Saturday 19 February 2005 22:54, you wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been banging my head on this one a couple of days with no luck.
>
> I have a IBM Thinkpad G41 with a pentium4
Hello!
On Fri 18 Feb 2005 21:49, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> I discovered that either the i2c_core.ko or i2c_i801.ko modules cause the
> hang
> on resume! If you stop the entire i2c subsystem from being loaded by hotplug
> (note this is the BUS driver, not the sensors driver!), then resume
Steven Rostedt wrote:
I have a IBM Thinkpad G41 with a pentium4M with Hyperthreading. I can't
get the PCMCIA working at all. I've tried turning off hyperthreading,
I've tried with and without preempt, I've even added pci=noacpi. I've
added Len's ACPI patches, but nothing works.
I see the same pr
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:22:09AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I have a IBM Thinkpad G41 with a pentium4M with Hyperthreading. I can't
> > get the PCMCIA working at all. I've tried turning off hyperthreading,
> > I've tried with and without preempt, I've even added pc
> How many distros do use some variant of bootsplash? SuSE does, from
> above url I guess gentoo does, too... Does Red Hat do something
> similar? [Or do they just set log-level to very high giving them clean
> look?] What about Debian?
Red Hat/Fedora uses "quiet" boot option, plus a userspace ea
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:26:59AM +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:22:09AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
I see the same problem with an IBM Thinkpad G40, and only when there is
1Gb of memory or more in the machine.
Check to see if your e820 map has a hole in it, and whether an
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> e820 map:
> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> BIOS-e820: - 0009f000 (usable)
> BIOS-e820: 0009f000 - 000a (reserved)
> BIOS-e820: 000ce000 - 000d (reserved)
> BIOS-
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 08:22:26AM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:36:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Linux version 2.6.10 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian
> > 1:3.3.5-8)) #13 SMP Sat Feb 19 20:12:19 EST 2005
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > BIOS
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:26:59AM +, Russell King wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:22:09AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> >>I see the same problem with an IBM Thinkpad G40, and only when there is
> >>1Gb of memory or more i
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:20:59AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > Is the hole between 0x36f6fa000 and 0x3f70?
> >
> > And what would be the proper way of fixing it (assuming that IBM won't
> > issue a fixed BIOS)?
>
> passing "reserve=0x3f6fa000,0x600" as kernel boot option. Please also
Hi,
David Roundy, creator of darcs, wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > I read in the webpage of the darcs kernel repository that they had
> > to add RAM serveral times to avoid running out of memory. They
> > needed more than 1G IIRC, and that was enoug
Hi:
This is more an attempt to get this indexed by web search engines than a
request for help, although maybe someone can draw some conclusion from the
following and be of some use to anyone. Although the subject refers to
some specific kernel version, what is reported in the mail is also valid
fo
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 22:14 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> +wait_for_completion_interruptible
> +wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
> +wait_for_completion_timeout
These are "emerging functionality" type.
There are some patches in the pipeline, which make use of this and
waited for inclu
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've used this technique in a few very
>> small programs to reduce their size (I could strip off both their bss and
>> data sections to save space). Also, I believe that the compiler is able
>> to optimize code using consts, but this is pure specula
Hello all,
I am running oprofile on some program. Following is the oprofile output.
---
Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not
stopped) with a unit mask of 0x01 (mandatory) count 10
samples %
I have the same broken box here: Graphics freezes, sometime the whole box: It
needs to warm up. Once warmed up, it will keep running stable forever (-:
(Ok, the forever claim can not be verified).
On Sunday 20 February 2005 11:39, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote:
> Hi:
>
> This is more an attempt
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:19:02AM +, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
Is the hole between 0x36f6fa000 and 0x3f70?
Looks like it.
And what would be the proper way of fixing it (assuming that IBM won't
issue a fixed BIOS)?
Try passing:
Hi,
After updating to a new kernel (>2.6.8) my PCMCIA ISDN did not work
anymore.
My test system now looks like this:
> uname -s -r -v -m
Linux 2.6.11-rc4 #5 Sun Feb 20 05:19:02 CET 2005 x86_64
> lspci | grep CardBus
:02:07.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4510 PC card Cardbus
Control
Higher bits (16-23) of the address were ignored
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 2005-02-19 17:38:53 +01:00
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 2005-02-19 17:38:53 +01:00
@@ -238,9 +23
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 22:51 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Does a patch like this (instead of your version) work for you? It removes
> the Intel quirk entirely, and replaces it with the "if there's no
> resource, use the parent resource as the default fallback" code.
Hi Linus,
I live on the East
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 08:22 +, Russell King wrote:
> Your BIOS is broken. You probably have 1GB of RAM which extends from
> 0x to 0x4000.
Just to leave no doubt. Yes, I have a Gig of RAM.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 10:20 +, Russell King wrote:
> BTW, try passing:
>
> reserve=0x3fefa000,0x6000
>
> to the kernel - this will mark the "hole" reserved and should reallocate
> the resources which are clashing with the RAM.
>
I just tried this on 2.6.9 (with no patches) and it wor
Hello
On Sunday 20 February 2005 11:44 am, you wrote:
>
> diff -u -U 7 /linux-2.6.11-rc4.changed/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_nonstatic.c
> ../linux-2.6.11-rc4/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_nonstatic.c
> --- /linux-2.6.11-rc4.changed/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_nonstatic.c
> 2005-02-20 11:37:39.0 +0100
> +++
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:30:31PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:03:42 +0100
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And to be honest we only have about 6 or 7 of these walkers
in the whole kernel. And 90% of them are in memory.c
While doing 4level I think I
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:44:25PM +0100, Martin Drohmann wrote:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> if (s->cb_dev) {
> ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource(s->cb_dev->bus, res, num, 1,
> min, 0, pcmcia_align, &data);
> } else
> #endif
> -
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:03:26PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Pavel, I agree with Michal, take a look at this version of the code
> instead of the version that you posted. It's a _whole_ lot more sane,
> and possibly even mergable.
>
> Michal, any thoughts on submitting it for inclusion? It seems
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi,
> Yes, I agree, almost anything is more sane than code I posted :-(. My
> only requirement is that it works with radeonfb and similar low-level
> drivers (so that I can get suspend-to-ram to work) and that it gets
> past our brand
Hello,
I'm trying to use iproute (20041019) with 2.4.29 official kernel on
a UltraSparc 1E. I have marked all packets that come from an
intranet server (192.168.0.130:3000 / tcp) like this :
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 13344 packets, 1830K bytes)
pkts bytes ta
This Patch replaces "(2 * HZ)" with "DATA_TIMEOUT" which is defined as
#define DATA_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ)
in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c in kernel 2.6.10.
Signed-off-by: Telemaque Ndizihiwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.10/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c.orig2005-02-20
12:44:22.23526784
What is this e-mail about?
Something in the kernel changed regarding the Intel e1000 driver from
2.6.5 to 2.6.10. The change resulted in thousands of errors when the NIC
is receiving data. For the past two weeks I have thought about this and
tried everything I could think of, it had really been
Hi,
Please do a
bk pull bk://bart.bkbits.net/ide-2.6
This will update the following files:
drivers/ide/Kconfig |2 +-
drivers/ide/ide-io.c |5 +++--
drivers/ide/ide.c|4
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
through these ChangeSets:
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
>> > there's something I don't understand: With IRQBALANCE *enabled* almost
>> > all interrupts are processed on CPU0. This changed in an unexpected way
>> > after disabling IRQBALANCE: now all interrupts are distributed uniformly
>> > to both CPUs. Maybe it's intentional, but it's not what I ex
--Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Saturday, February 19, 2005
11:30:53 -0500):
> Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>> You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it
>> has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the
>> time will not be good on ca
> I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask.
> Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system.
>
>CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 31931808 0IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 76595 0IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 8: 1 0IO-AP
Andrew,
This set of patches form the first half of a major perfctr API update.
The goal is to change the upload-new-control-data system call to be
much more generic and independent of struct layouts. To this end the
upload-new-control-data syscall will become
ret = sys_vperfctr_write(fd, n
perfctr-2.7.10 update, 2/4:
- Update i386 syscall table for perfctr-2.7.10 API changes.
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arch/i386/kernel/entry.S |3 +--
arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S |3 +--
include/asm-i386/unistd.h|7 +++
include/asm-x86_
perfctr-2.7.10 update, 3/4:
- Update x86_64 syscall table for perfctr-2.7.10 API changes.
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h |8 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -rupN linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.
Hi,
I compiled the 2.6.10 kernel with HyperThreading optimization (I'm running a
3.06 Ghz single Xeon processor with HT enabled). More or less, I'm running
Mandrake 10 Official, but with my own kernel. Can anybody help explain why I'm
getting this Oops on shutdown? It doesn't happen all the
perfctr-2.7.10 update, 4/4:
- Update ppc32 syscall table for perfctr-2.7.10 API changes.
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S |5 ++---
include/asm-ppc/unistd.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -rupN linux-2.6.11-
Hi,
I've been recently trying to get my lmsensors working under
2.6.9, and i've found this:
http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Feb/2856.html
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/11/90
kernel patch for gl520 chip, but after applying it kernel refused to
compile. So I've fixed it using gl51
Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:58:48AM -0800, Mickey Stein wrote:
From: Mickey Stein
Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk7, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc
rawhide from 19Feb DL)
gcc4 cvs seems to dislike "include/linux/i2c.h file":
Error msg: include/linux/i2c.h:{55,194} error: a
On Sunday 20 February 2005 05:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 985913 8.6083 vmlinux mark_offset_tsc
> 584473 5.1032 libc-2.3.2.so getc
What makes you think mark_offset_tsc is slow? Do you have any comparative
numbers? It might just be that the workload you a
Hi,
My linux laptop says:
irq 5: nobody cared!
[] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x90
[] note_interrupt+0x61/0x90
[] __do_IRQ+0x13b/0x150
[] do_IRQ+0x23/0x40
[] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[] __do_softirq+0x2e/0x80
[] do_softirq+0x27/0x30
[] irq_exit+0x35/0x40
[] do_IRQ+0x28/0x40
[] common_interru
On Feb 20 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> My linux laptop says:
> irq 5: nobody cared!
(...)
> Does anyone care? :-)
Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure
scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored,
unfortunately.
I am willing to test
> [] (ndis_irq_th+0x0/0xf0 [ndiswrapper])
> Disabling IRQ #5
>
> Does anyone care? :-)
doubt it ... ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Plea
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Feb 20 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
My linux laptop says:
irq 5: nobody cared!
(...)
Does anyone care? :-)
Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure
scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored,
unfortu
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:36:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > BIOS-e820: - 0009f000 (usable)
> > BIOS-e820: 0009f000 - 000a (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 000d - 000d4000 (reserved)
> >
Hi.
The device is: USB2.0 to IDE 3.5" hard disk enclosure.
Producer: Seven.
Part of /var/log/messages with USB debug enabled in kernel is
attached to this email.
Kernel: 2.6.9, 2.6.10 (i cant remember from which one is attached log).
Distribution: Gentoo.
I'm not subscribed to the list, pleas C
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> But the PCI allocations are not at all limited by MAXMEM - they want to be
> in the low 4GB, but that's the only real limit. So using "max_low_pfn" to
> determine where to start PCI allocations is pretty bogus.
>
> I'll try to write something tha
On Feb 20 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Rogério Brito wrote:
> >I am willing to test any patch and configuration (let's call me a
> >"guinea pig"), but I don't know what I should do. I have, OTOH,
> >reported my problem many times in the past few days. :-(
> >
> >I will retry sending my mes
I get time-outs when trying to access kernel.org but the ftp works. Is
this scheduled?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[1.] PROBLEM: agpgart-via: probe fails with error -22
[2.] When loading agpgart/agpgart-via the following occurs:
Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected VIA KT400/KT400A/KT600 chipset
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 816M
agpgart: unable to determine ap
Stephen R. Bordeleau wrote:
I get time-outs when trying to access kernel.org but the ftp works. Is
this scheduled?
thanks. should be ok now.
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
Per our discussion, i've ported the 2.6 nforce skip timer override (and
early PCI access) code to 2.4. This fixes an issue whereupon nforce
systems have incorrect override values for irq0. Architectures affected
are i386 and x86_64
Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# This is a
I see this panic when booting 2.6.11-rc4 (plus some of my own patches...but my
modules
have not loaded at the point of the crash).
The system is a Shuttle system with the FB65 motherboard. CPU is 3.0Ghz P4 with
1MB cache and hyperthreading. HD is an 80GB SATA disk. NVIDIA card is
installed
(bu
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Feb 20 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
I am willing to test any patch and configuration (let's call me a
"guinea pig"), but I don't know what I should do. I have, OTOH,
reported my problem many times in the past few days. :-(
I will retry sen
HI !
I noticed a slight proc filesystem strangness in the 2.4.2X and 2.6.X
(atleast up to 2.6.8). Assuming that process 8655 exists and is running
long enough (ls -lR / or so)
cd /proc/8655
kill -9 8655
ls
/usr/bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle
open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_D
Ben Greear wrote:
I see this panic when booting 2.6.11-rc4 (plus some of my own
patches...but my modules
have not loaded at the point of the crash).
Same things happens with a kernel built w/out any of my patches, by the
way...
Ben
--
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Candela Technologies Inc http:
> Does Linux currently support Wake-on-LAN/PCI? I have a 3Com
> 3c905 TX-M NIC which supports wake-on-LAN and wake-on-PCI.
> On Windows XP, I have configured the system so that I can use
> "ether-wake" to wake up mysystem from standby/hibernation
> remotely through the network.
(cut)
> However,
Hi
I wrote earlier to the list[1] asking for a driver for the watchdog
included in the 6300ESB chipset. I got a 2.4 driver via private email
from Ross Biro which I've changed into what I hope resembles a 2.6
driver (which was done by looking a lot at the watchdog drivers already
in the 2.6 tree
Hi Vise People,
ASUS P2B-DS board seems NOT work very well with default kernel in FED
Core 3. smp-kernel hangs booting at various stages. I am goig to try
2.6.10 today. non-smp-kernel boots fine. This is my first time I try to
test with smp-kernels so I don't know what I could try. Could someone
I've been sitting on this for over a year now, kicking it out in the
hopes that someone finds it useful. kernel.org was down when I was
tidying this up so it's against 2.6.10 which is what I had handy.
/proc/kmalloc allocation tracing
This quick hack adds accounting for kmalloc/kfree callers. Thi
Ben Greear wrote:
I see this panic when booting 2.6.11-rc4 (plus some of my own
patches...but my modules
have not loaded at the point of the crash).
The system is a Shuttle system with the FB65 motherboard. CPU is
3.0Ghz P4 with
1MB cache and hyperthreading. HD is an 80GB SATA disk. NVIDIA ca
Der Herr Hofrat wrote:
HI !
I noticed a slight proc filesystem strangness in the 2.4.2X and 2.6.X
(atleast up to 2.6.8). Assuming that process 8655 exists and is running
long enough (ls -lR / or so)
cd /proc/8655
kill -9 8655
ls
/usr/bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle
open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOC
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Russell, what do your eagle-eyes think of a patch like this?
Steven, does this fix it without the need for any kernel command line (or
any other patches, for that matter - ie revert all the transparency-
changing ones)?
Linus
I tried the patch on my G40
small nitpick, __KERNEL__ is the inner ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -purN linux-2.6.11-rc4.orig/include/linux/compiler.h
linux-2.6.11-rc4-klibc/include/linux/compiler.h
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4.orig/include/linux/compiler.h 2005-02-13
04:06:55.0 +0100
++
> >Perhaps node masks would be better and teaching the kernel to handle
> >relative distances inside the masks transparently while migrating?
> >Not sure how complicated this would be to implement though.
> >
> >Supporting interleaving on the new nodes may be also useful, that would
> >need a polic
> When running a Posix conformance test (from posixtestsuite), the kernel
> locks up with:
>
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0
>
> Pid: 1873, comm: 10-1.test
> EIP: 0060:[] CPU: 0
> EIP is at sys_timer_settime+0xfa+0x1f0
> EFLAGS: 0282 Not tainted (2.6.11-rc3-mm2)
> EAX: 0282 EBX: 0
On Sünndag 20 Februar 2005 21:47, Matt Mackall wrote:
> I've been sitting on this for over a year now, kicking it out in the
> hopes that someone finds it useful. kernel.org was down when I was
> tidying this up so it's against 2.6.10 which is what I had handy.
>
> /proc/kmalloc allocation tracing
Der Herr Hofrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cd /proc/8655
> kill -9 8655
> ls
> /usr/bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle
Seems to be fixed in 2.6.10-ac9 or earlier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Andi wrote:
> I still think it's fundamentally unclean and racy. External processes
> shouldn't mess with virtual addresses of other processes.
It's not really messing with (changing) the virtual addresses of
another process. It's messing with the physical placement. It's
using the virtual addre
> Do you have any better way to suggest, Andi, for a batch manager to
> relocate a job? The typical scenario, as Ray explained it to me, is
- Give the shared libraries and any other files a suitable policy
(by mapping them and applying mbind)
- Then execute migrate_pages() for the anonymous pag
> Hi Vise People,
>
>
> ASUS P2B-DS board seems NOT work very well with default kernel in FED
> Core 3. smp-kernel hangs booting at various stages. I am goig to try
> 2.6.10 today. non-smp-kernel boots fine. This is my first time I try to
> test with smp-kernels so I don't know what I could try.
Being a wireless user i experience the occasional connection loss due
to walking out of range or something, recently after starting to use
cifs mounts instead of smbfs, I've noticed that stuff tends to break
if i lose connection.
I first noticed this when my bootscript brought down the wireless
bef
I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom.
I got a stripped-down kernel to boot from floppy, ran lspci to get
the hardware information.
I then reconfigured and rebuilt the kernel for the image.
I built this kernel from stock 2.6.10 from www.kernel.org.
This is the confi
Alex Tomas wrote:
+static inline struct semaphore * lock_sem(struct inode *dir, struct qstr *name)
+{
+ if (IS_PDIROPS(dir)) {
+ struct super_block *sb;
+ /* name->hash expected to be already calculated */
+ sb = dir->i_sb;
+ BUG_ON(sb->
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:57:22PM -0500, Kenton Groombridge wrote:
> [1.] PROBLEM: agpgart-via: probe fails with error -22
>
> [2.] When loading agpgart/agpgart-via the following occurs:
>
> Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
> agpgart: Detected VIA KT400/KT400A/KT600 chipset
> Jan Blunck (JB) writes:
JB> With luck you have s_pdirops_size (or 1024) different renames altering
JB> concurrently one directory inode. Therefore you need a lock protecting
JB> your filesystem data. This is basically the job done by i_sem. So in
JB> my opinion you only move "The Problem
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 15:22 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom.
I handled this by putting smart-boot http://btmgr.webframe.org/ in the
hard drive MBR from a dos floppy, smart-boot can boot from a cdrom.
Then as long as you don't wipe
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Brian Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 15:22 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> > I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom.
> I handled this by putting smart-boot http://btmgr.webframe.org/ in the
> hard drive MBR from a dos floppy, smart-boot c
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
--Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Saturday, February 19, 2005
11:30:53 -0500):
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it
has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the
time will not b
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make a needlessly global function static
- make three needlessly global structs static
Since after moving the now-static stucts to smc-mca.c the file smc-mca.h
was empty except for two #define's, I've also killed the rest of
smc-mca
this patch needlessly eats formfeeds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
this patch eats formfeeds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Adrian Bunk wrote:
- if (ei_debug > 0)
- printk(version);
I agree the version variable is outdated, but I disagree that the driver
intro banner should be removed completely.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch makes some needlessly global code static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/lp486e.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2-full/drivers/net/lp486e.c.old 2005-02-16 16:08:34.0 +01
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch makes some needlessly global firmware static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/appletalk/cops_ffdrv.h |2 +-
drivers/net/appletalk/cops_ltdrv.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2-full/
> - Give the shared libraries and any other files a suitable policy
> (by mapping them and applying mbind)
Ah - I think you've said this before, and I'm being a bit retarded.
You're saying that one could horse around with the physical placement of
existing files mapped into another tasks space b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Michal Januszewski wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
How many distros do use some variant of bootsplash? SuSE does, from
above url I guess gentoo does, too... Does RedHat do something
similar? [Or
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
Hi!
The first one is allocation error (linuxrc wants to get/read memory, but
the allocation fails?). The other errors are _maybe_ caused by the first
error (the scheduler schedules while a atomic operation is in progress).
Is your Kernel configuration different to t
Hi,
I am new to linux. I am trying to build one of my drivers for
2.6.9-5.EL, RHEL 4, I am getting compile parse errors as follows:
error: parse error before '(' token
#gcc -v
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr/adaptec/build/gcc343-32bit
--enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --target=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Hudson wrote:
| I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom.
| I got a stripped-down kernel to boot from floppy, ran lspci to get
| the hardware information.
|
| I then reconfigured and rebuilt the kernel for the image.
|
Matt Mackall wrote:
I've been sitting on this for over a year now, kicking it out in the
hopes that someone finds it useful. kernel.org was down when I was
tidying this up so it's against 2.6.10 which is what I had handy.
/proc/kmalloc allocation tracing
This quick hack adds accounting for kmalloc/
Anil Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am new to linux. I am trying to build one of my drivers for
2.6.9-5.EL, RHEL 4, I am getting compile parse errors as follows:
error: parse error before '(' token
Complete gcc output plus driver source file would help a lot.
#gcc -v
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr/
Hi, Jens:
I think this question belongs to your domain, but please let me know
if I'm mistaken, so I can pursue this elsewhere.
I encountered a strange performance anomaly. I do the following:
<- Plug USB key
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# time dd if=/dev/uba of=/dev/null bs=10k count=10240
10240+0 r
Andi Kleen wrote:
But we are least at the level of agreeing that the new system
call looks something like the following:
migrate_pages(pid, count, old_list, new_list);
right?
For the external case probably yes. For internal (process does this
on its own address space) it should be hooked into mbin
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 09:56 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Steven, does this fix it without the need for any kernel command line (or
> any other patches, for that matter - ie revert all the transparency-
> changing ones)?
>
> Linus
>
Hi Linus,
I just tried it out (after removing
Andrew Morton wrote:
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(This has actually been there for a while, but I only
noticed it in dmesg this morning).
During boot on a dual em64t I see ..
scsi2 : ata_piix
isa bounce pool size: 16 pages
slab error in cache_free_debugcheck(): cache `size-2048': double f
Actually, here's a better fix.
Jeff
= drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 1.116 vs edited =
--- 1.116/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-02-01 20:23:51 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-02-20 23:34:32 -05:00
@@ -2800,7 +2800,7 @@
return 1;
/* fall through */
-
+
def
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
