[patch 099/198] x86_64: Rewrite exception stack backtracing

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Exceptions and hardware interrupts can, to a certain degree, nest, so when attempting to follow the sequence of stacks used in order to dump their contents this has to be accounted for. Also, IST stacks have their tops stored in the TSS, so there's no need

[patch 097/198] x86_64: add support for Intel dual-core detection and displaying

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Appended patch adds the support for Intel dual-core detection and displaying the core related information in /proc/cpuinfo. It adds two new fields "core id" and "cpu cores" to x86 /proc/cpuinfo and the "core id" field for x86_64("cpu cores" field is alrea

Re: [PATCH] ds1337 4/4

2005-04-12 Thread James Chapman
Jean Delvare wrote: Based on your and Jean's input, following so far sounds reasonable: Create "charge" sysfs entry for ds1339 when it is detected. Do not write any value to Trickle Charge register, until its value is written to this entry. While I admit I had this in mind in the first place, the m

Bugreport

2005-04-12 Thread Amelia Nilsson
Hey, I've found a bug in 2.6.11.6. I have a Toshiba laptop and when i did run 2.6.11.6 my touchpad flipped out, it clicked everywhere when it wasn't supposed to click. I couldn't even move my mouse without it was clicking all over. It works fine i 2.6.10 though. Is there any changes made that ca

Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning

2005-04-12 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Franco "Sensei" wrote: Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:22:30 -0500 From: Franco "Sensei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning Krzysztof Halasa wrote:

[patch 085/198] x86_64: Support constantly ticking TSCs

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Intel Noconas the TSC ticks with a constant frequency. Don't scale the factor used by udelay when cpufreq changes the frequency. This generalizes an earlier patch by Intel for this. Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[patch 080/198] x86_64: Minor microoptimization in syscall entry slow path

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Minor microoptimization in syscall entry slow path Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -pu

[patch 081/198] x86_64: Call do_notify_resume unconditionally in entry.S

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This removes some unnecessary code in the assembly files. Matches i386 behaviour. In addition don't clear the work check mask after work has been done. This fixes some theoretical signal/other event losses. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Si

[patch 074/198] x86_64: clean up ptrace single-stepping

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ported from i386 (originally from Linus) clean up ptrace single-stepping, make PT_DTRACE exact. (This makes the naming of "DTRACE" purely historical, since on x86 it now means "single step in progress"). Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[patch 075/198] x86_64: Some fixes for single step handling

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: "Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ported from i386/Linus Be more careful with TF handling to fix some copy protection codes in Wine Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c | 18 --

FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Daniel Walker
I just wanted to discuss the problem a little more. From all the conversations that I've had it seem that everyone is worried about having PI in Fusyn, and PI in the RT mutex. It seems like these two locks are going to interact on a very limited basis. Fusyn will be the user space mutex, and the

[patch 066/198] x86-64: i386 vDSO: add PT_NOTE segment

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Use the i386 PT_NOTE segment in x86_64 as well. Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/arch/x86_64/ia32/vsyscall-sigreturn.S |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff -puN

[patch 053/198] ppc64: remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> During some code inspection using gcc 4.0 I noticed a stack frame was being created for a number of functions that didnt require it. For example: c00df944 <._spin_unlock>: c00df944: fb e1 ff f0 std r31,-16(r1) c00df

[patch 054/198] ppc64: no prefetch for NULL pointers

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For prefetches of NULL (as when walking a short linked list), PPC64 will in some cases take a performance hit. The hardware needs to do the TLB walk, and said walk will always miss, which means (up to) two L2 misses as penalty. This seems to hurt overall

[patch 052/198] ppc64: remove bogus f50 hack in prom.c

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The code that parses the OF device tree contains an old bogus hack which was killed a long time ago on ppc32, but survived in ppc64. It was supposed to help with a problem on the f50 which is ... a 32 bits machine :) Additionally, that hack is ca

[patch 007/198] crypto: call zlib end functions on deflate exit path

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Artem B. Bityuckiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In the deflate_[compress|uncompress|pcompress] functions we call the zlib_[in|de]flateReset function at the beginning. This is OK. But when we unload the deflate module we don't call zlib_[in|de]flateEnd to free all the zlib internal data. It looks

[patch 059/198] piix: IDE PATA patch for Intel ESB2

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds the Intel ESB2 DID's to the piix.c file for IDE PATA support. Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/drivers/ide/pci/piix.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

[patch 062/198] ahci: AHCI mode SATA patch for Intel ESB2

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds the Intel ESB2 DID's to the ahci.c file for AHCI mode SATA support. Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/drivers/scsi/ahci.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 ins

[patch 058/198] irq and pci_ids: patch for Intel ESB2

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds the Intel ESB2 DID's to the irq.c and pci_ids.h files. Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/arch/i386/pci/irq.c |1 + 25-akpm/include/linux/pci_ids.h | 31 ++

[patch 063/198] i2c-i801: I2C patch for Intel ESB2

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds the Intel ESB2 DID's to the i2c-i801.c and Kconfig files for I2C support. Signed-off-by:  Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/drivers/i2c/busses/Kcon

[patch 004/198] arm: fix help text for ixdp465

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For some reason, this help text was missed when the file was last audited by the documentation referencing folk. Fix this incorrect documentation reference. Signed-off-by: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

[patch 049/198] ppc64: fix export of wrong symbol

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In arch/ppc64/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c, we are still exporting flush_icache_range, but that has been changed to be an inline in include/asm-ppc64/cacheflush.h which calls __flush_icache_range (defined in arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S). This patch changes the export

[patch 046/198] pmac: Improve sleep code of tumbler driver

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch improves the behaviour of the "tumbler/snapper" driver used on newer PowerMacs during sleep. It properly set the HW mutes to shut down amplifiers and does an analog shutdown of the codec. That might improve power consumption during sle

[patch 045/198] pmac: sound support for latest laptops

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch hacks the current Alsa snd-powermac driver to add support for recent machine models with the tas3004 chip, that is basically new laptop models. The Mac Mini is _NOT_ yet supported by this patch (soon soon ...). The G5s (iMac or Desktop

[patch 038/198] ppc32: Fix building 32bit kernel for 64bit machines

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> When building a ppc32 MULTIPLATFORM kernel for a 64bit pmac, we try and build certain files or use certain functions that make no sense in that context. This catches the last of these. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[

[patch 001/198] mmtimer build fix

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 25-akpm/drivers/char/mmtimer.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN drivers/char/mmtimer.c~mmtimer-build-fix driv

[patch 033/198] ppc32: make usage of CONFIG_PTE_64BIT & CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT consistent

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CONFIG_PTE_64BIT & CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT are not currently consistently used in the code base. Fixed up the usage such that CONFIG_PTE_64BIT is used when we have a 64-bit PTE regardless of physical address width. CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is used if the physical address

[patch 034/198] ppc32: Allow adjust of pfn offset in pte

2005-04-12 Thread akpm
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Allow the pfn to be offset by more than just PAGE_SHIFT in the pte. Today, PAGE_SHIFT tends to allow us to have 12-bits of flags in the pte. In the future if we have a larger pte we can allocate more bits for flags by offsetting the pfn even further. Signed

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: very basic desktop g5 sound support (#2)

2005-04-12 Thread Lee Revell
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:07 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi ! > > (Andrew: This is an update of the previous patch, it fixes a problem > with headphone beeing incorrectly muted on some models). > > This patch hacks the current PowerMac Alsa driver to add some basic > support of analog s

Re: incoming

2005-04-12 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Andrew Morton schrub am Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:10:45 -0700: > David Vrabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is there any chance that in the future that these patch sets get posted >> all to one thread? > > I never got around to setting that up, plus the Subject:s pretty quickly > become invis

Re: 2.6.11.x: bootprompt: ALSA: no soundcard detected

2005-04-12 Thread Dennis Heuer
It's definetly ACPI! I played around with ACPI options in the BIOS and got my card working again. However, now reiserfs sometimes hangs and remembers this state so that I must check it from a live-cd. Linux 2.6 is definetly more sensible than 2.4. Regards, Dennis - To unsubscribe from this list:

[PATCH] SELinux: cleanup ipc_has_perm

2005-04-12 Thread Stephen Smalley
This patch removes the sclass argument from ipc_has_perm in the SELinux module, as it can be obtained from the ipc security structure. The use of a separate argument was a legacy of the older precondition function handling in SELinux and is obsolete. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter > where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:

RE: FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
>From: Esben Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On 12 Apr 2005, Daniel Walker wrote: > >> >> >> At least, both mutexes will need to use the same API to raise and lower >> priorities. > >You basicly need 3 priorities: >1) Actual: task->prio >2) Base prio with no RT locks taken: task->static_prio >3)

RE: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-12 Thread David Schwartz
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, David Schwartz wrote: > > > If you buy a W*nd*ws install CD, you can create a derived work, > > > e.g. an image > > > of your installation, under the fair use rights (IANAL). Can you > > > distribute > > > that image freely? > > I would say that if not for the EULA, yo

Re: oops in misc_register, kernel 2.6.9+, using udev

2005-04-12 Thread Andrew Thomas
Andrew Thomas wrote: Hello, I am trying to install the srripc module - source at: http://www.cogent.ca/Software/SRR.html on a Linux 2.6.x kernel with udev support. The kernel generates an oops in misc_register, which is essentially the first call that the module makes on initialization. Oops

RE: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver

2005-04-12 Thread Kilau, Scott
Hi Greg, all, > Ok, but wasn't it possible to get those additional things added to the > main kernel serial core, which would then provide everything that Digi's > customers are accustomed to? Yes, it is my intention in the future to add support for the needed information, probably at the /sys le

Re: [patch 6/9] blk: unplug later

2005-04-12 Thread Andrew Morton
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > get_request_wait needn't unplug the device immediately. Probably. But what if the get_request(q, rw, GFP_NOIO); did some sleeping? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mor

What does 'WrongLevel' mean in RAID0 ?

2005-04-12 Thread J.A. Magallon
Hi all... I have a RAID0 setup on top of three IDE drives. mdadm monitor sends me mesages with: DeviceDisappeared /dev/md0 Wrong-Level The RAID seems to be working well. Any pointer on what does this mean ? PD: I know it is a bit strange raid, see: annwn:~# cat /proc/partitions major minor #b

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread David Eger
The reason I am questioning this point is the GIT README file. Linus makes explicit that a "blob" is just the "file contents," and that really, a "blob" is not just the SHA1 of the "blob": > In particular, the "current directory cache" certainly does not need to > be consistent with the current

RE: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-12 Thread Bodo Eggert
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, David Schwartz wrote: > > The EULA is irrelevant in germany and in many parts of the USA. > > Really? I was under the impression EULA's were routinely upheld in the > USA. > If you have any references for that, I'd love to hear them. http://www.freibrunlaw.com/article

RE: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver

2005-04-12 Thread Kilau, Scott
> There's a consensus that if there's *any* choice, new /proc files as > well as new ioctls shall not be introduced. So if there's management needed Oh, keep in mind, the ioctls are not new. They exist today, and are clearly defined in Documentation/ioctl-number.txt > 'd' F0-FF linux/digi1.

Re: [patch 2/9] mempool gfp flag

2005-04-12 Thread Andrew Morton
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The first is that mempool_alloc can possibly get stuck in __alloc_pages > when they should opt to fail, and take an element from their reserved pool. > > The second is that it will happily eat emergency PF_MEMALLOC reserves > instead of going to their

No more 30 days delays for Software

2005-04-12 Thread Download Software
Have your see promotions selling OEM software,did you notice their shipping time - 20 days LOL, why would someone wait for 20 days to receive a product We offer exactly the same software via instant download All software available http://Nanette.bhwittalii.com/?udw2wFvOayBJt.uNanette not inte

Re: [stable] [patch 1/1] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular

2005-04-12 Thread Chris Wright
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This trick is useless, because sys_ni.c will handle this problem by itself, > like it does even on UML for other syscalls. > Also, it does not provide the NFSD syscall when NFSD is compiled as a module, > which is a bi

Re: incoming

2005-04-12 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:23:22AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > As the commits list probably isn't working at present I'll cc linux-kernel > on this lot. Fairly cruel, sorry, but I don't like the idea of people not > knowing what's hitting the main tree. I don't see a patch which adds linux/pm.h

Re: GIT license (Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.1)

2005-04-12 Thread Chris Friesen
Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter Well, yes, but the last merge point search may not be so simple: A --1---26---7 B\ `-4-. / C `-3-5' Now, when at 7, your last merge point is not 1, but 2. ...and this is obviously wrong, sorr

Re: [PATCH 1/3] cifs: md5 cleanup - functions

2005-04-12 Thread Francois Romieu
Steve French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > There was a patch suggested a year or so ago to remove the older cifs > md5 implementation and have cifsencrypt.c use the newer Linux crypto > API, but since it made the code considerably more complex it did not > make any sense. The current crypto API see

Re: incoming

2005-04-12 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:08:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't see a patch which adds linux/pm.h to linux/sysdev.h, which is > > required to fix ARM builds in -rc2 and onwards kernels. > > That fix is buried in [patch 105/198] Great, than

Re: snd-ens1371 (alsa) & joystick woes

2005-04-12 Thread Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Speaking of which... is there anyone out > there with a ens1371 that actually works right with joysticks? Yes, I'm using the oss driver. -- Airstrikes always overshoot the target, artillery always falls short. - To unsubscribe from this list: send

[PATCH] usb: kfree cleanup for drivers/usb/* - no need to check for NULL

2005-04-12 Thread Jesper Juhl
Get rid of a bunch of redundant NULL pointer checks in drivers/usb/*, there's no need to check a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- class/audio.c | 48 +++--- class/bluetty.c

Re: incoming

2005-04-12 Thread Andrew Morton
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't see a patch which adds linux/pm.h to linux/sysdev.h, which is > required to fix ARM builds in -rc2 and onwards kernels. That fix is buried in [patch 105/198] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body o

Re: bkbits.net is down

2005-04-12 Thread Toon van der Pas
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > > On 2005-04-12, at 04:17, Larry McVoy wrote whatever... > > > > Excuse me, but: who gives a damn shit? > > Lots of people do; those who use bitkeeper, and even people (like me) who > don'

[NUMA] Make IDE control structures node local

2005-04-12 Thread Christoph Lameter
Patch to allocate the control structures for for ide devices on the node of the device itself (yield performance improvements for NUMA systems). The patch depends on the Slab API change patch by Manfred and me (in mm) and the pcidev_to_node patch that I posted today. Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbe

Add pcibus_to_node

2005-04-12 Thread Christoph Lameter
Define pcibus_to_node to be able to figure out which NUMA node contains a given PCI device. This defines pcibus_to_node(bus) in include/linux/topology.h and adjusts the macros for i386 and x86_64 that already provided a way to determine the cpumask of a pci device. x86_64 was changed to not build

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Simple privacy enhancement for /proc/

2005-04-12 Thread Rene Scharfe
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:29:35AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > If you really can't allow access based on tty, then at least allow > access if any UID value matches any UID value. Without this, a user > can not always see a setuid program they are running. Yes, that's a bug. Below is a new vers

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, David Eger wrote: > > The reason I am questioning this point is the GIT README file. > > Linus makes explicit that a "blob" is just the "file contents," and that > really, a "blob" is not just the SHA1 of the "blob": > > > In particular, the "current directory cache" certa

RE: FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
>From: Daniel Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Well yeah, but you could lock a fusyn, then invoke a system call which >> locks a kernel semaphore. > >Right .. For deadlock detection, I want to assume that the fusyn lock is >on the outer level. That way both deadlock detection system will work

RE: [Hotplug_sig] RE: [PATCH 1/6]sep initializing rework

2005-04-12 Thread Protasevich, Natalie
> Hello, > This is a hotplug CPU patch for i386, done against 2.6.12-rc2-mm3. > Somewhat alternative to the one posted by Li Shaohua, but not really (and I didn't mean that :). > If you look closer, our patches are different and can complement each other I think. > Li did great job on sep, after-

Re: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver

2005-04-12 Thread Matt Mackall
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:21:15PM -0500, Kilau, Scott wrote: > Hi Greg, all, > > > Ok, but wasn't it possible to get those additional things added to the > > main kernel serial core, which would then provide everything that > Digi's > > customers are accustomed to? > > Yes, it is my intention in

Re: Exploit in 2.6 kernels

2005-04-12 Thread John M Collins
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels > > and we'll see what happens. > > BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're protected from > another loca

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-12 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:01:15PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > Would you agree that compiling and linking a program that uses > a library creates a derivative work of that library? No, I would not. Creating a derivative work requires creativity, and a linker is not creative. The copyrig

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-12 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:05:59PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > Yes, the GPL can give you rights you wouldn't otherwise have. A > EULA can take away rights you would otherwise have. What compels you to agree with an EULA? > In the few court cases that have directly addresses shrink-

Re: AOE and large filesystems?

2005-04-12 Thread Ed L Cashin
Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some questions for the list: > > 1) Is anyone on the list using AOE in production? I don't know of any AoE users that read the lkml. Except me, of course. > 2) Is anyone on the list using AOE in combination with md and/or LVM2? Yes, most AoE users us

Re: FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Daniel Walker
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 13:33, Joe Korty wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:15:02AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > It seems like these two locks are going to interact on a very limited > > basis. Fusyn will be the user space mutex, and the RT mutex is only in > > the kernel. You can't lock an RT

RE: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver

2005-04-12 Thread Kilau, Scott
Hi Matt, The ball is in my court, because my wishes as a copyright holder are not being honored. Which is the right of Christoph because of the GPL, but it sure doesn't help the end users of said product. Your claim that you are trying to "help" end users is bogus and just plain wrong. Period. >

Re: Exploit in 2.6 kernels

2005-04-12 Thread Chris Wright
* John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels > and we'll see what happens. BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're protected from another local root exploit. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: se

RE: FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
>From: Daniel Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I just wanted to discuss the problem a little more. From all the >conversations that I've had it seem that everyone is worried about >having PI in Fusyn, and PI in the RT mutex. It sure is overlapping functionalities. > ... >The RT mutex will neve

[patch 2/3]: entry.S trap return fixes

2005-04-12 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. do_debug() returns void, do_int3() too when !CONFIG_KPROBES. This patch fixes the CONFIG_KPROBES variant of do_int3() to return void too and adjusts the entry.S accordingly. Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.old 2005-04-12 09:47:38.0 +

[patch 0/3] Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm3

2005-04-12 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Andrew Morton wrote: OK, the `int $3' is part of the CONFIG_TRAP_BAD_SYSCALL_EXITS thing which I never use. I'm not sure what problem is actually being reported here, now you mention it. The problem being reported here is that CONFIG_TRAP_BAD_SYSCALL_EXITS does nothing but locking up your ma

Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)

2005-04-12 Thread Bodo Eggert
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think that would be _much_ nicer implemented as a mount which is > > > invisible to other users, rather than one which causes the admin's > > > scripts to spew error messages. Is the namespace mechanism at a

Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning

2005-04-12 Thread Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Franco "Sensei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >> It isn't enough. The same compiler and the same .config - yes. But that >> means you'd have no progress within, say, 2.6. Only bug fixes. >> There _is_ a tree like that - 2.6.11.Xs are only bugfixes. > > Ok, this adds a new i

Re: New SCM and commit list

2005-04-12 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Adam J. Richter wrote: > On 2005-04-11, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > >If merge took trees instead of single files, and had some way of detecting > >renames (or it got additional information about the differences between > >files), would that give BK-quality performance? Or does BK

Re: [patch 134/198] officially deprecate register_ioctl32_conversion

2005-04-12 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 10:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > These have been deprecated since ->compat_ioctl when in, thus only a short > deprecation period. There's four users left: i2o_config, s390/z90crypy, > s390/dasd and s390/zfcp and for the first two patches are about to be > submitted to ge

Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)

2005-04-12 Thread Jamie Lokier
Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > That said, I would _usually_ prefer that when I enter a tgz, that I > > see all component files having the same uid/gid/permissions as the tgz > > file itself - the same as I'd see if I entered a zip file. > > As you say _usually_, even you admit that sometimes you wo

Re: [PATCH] parisc: kfree cleanup in arch/parisc/

2005-04-12 Thread Grant Grundler
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:54:25PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Get rid of redundant NULL pointer checks before kfree() in arch/parisc/ as > well as a few blank lines. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks! Commited to cvs.parisc-linux.org: http://lists.parisc-linux.o

NFS2 question, help, pls!

2005-04-12 Thread Xin Zhao
I have very very fast network and is testing NFS2 over this kind of network. I noticed that for standard work like read/write a large file, compile kernels, the performance of NFS2 is good. But if I try to decompress kernel tar file. The standard ext2 takes 28s while NFS2 takes 81s. Also, if I rem

Re: What does 'WrongLevel' mean in RAID0 ?

2005-04-12 Thread J.A. Magallon
On 04.12, Neil Brown wrote: > On Tuesday April 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all... > > > > I have a RAID0 setup on top of three IDE drives. > > mdadm monitor sends me mesages with: > > > > DeviceDisappeared > > /dev/md0 > > Wrong-Level > > > > The RAID seems to be working well. Any point

Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning

2005-04-12 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
"Franco \"Sensei\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about making extensive use of modules? If everything (acceptable) > is built on modules, can you still have abi, can you still change > modules and api implementation without breaking anything? Yes, but you still can't change .config. You ena

Re: [PATCH] Maintainers list update: linux-net -> netdev

2005-04-12 Thread George Anzinger
Horms wrote: On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: On Fri, 8 April 2005 22:16:07 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: More importantly, it is still listed as "the list" for network drivers... NETWORK DEVICE DRIVERS P: Andrew Morton M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: Jeff Garzik M:

Re: What does 'WrongLevel' mean in RAID0 ?

2005-04-12 Thread Neil Brown
On Tuesday April 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all... > > I have a RAID0 setup on top of three IDE drives. > mdadm monitor sends me mesages with: > > DeviceDisappeared > /dev/md0 > Wrong-Level > > The RAID seems to be working well. Any pointer on what does this > mean ? From "man mdadm"

Re: FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Daniel Walker
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 13:29, Esben Nielsen wrote: > You basicly need 3 priorities: > 1) Actual: task->prio > 2) Base prio with no RT locks taken: task->static_prio > 3) Base prio with no Fusyn locks taken: task->?? > > So no, you will not need the same API, at all :-) Fusyn manipulates > task->st

BUGs in 2.6.12-rc2-RT-V0.7.45-01

2005-04-12 Thread William Weston
Hello, These two BUGs showed up in 2.6.12-rc2-RT-V0.7.45-01 on my P4/HT desktop machine at work: During boot, after unused kernel memory freed: BUG: kstopmachine:1072 RT task yield()-ing! [] dump_stack+0x23/0x25 (20) [] yield+0x67/0x69 (20) [] stop_machine+0xa4/0x15e (40) [] do_stop+0x15/0x

Re: Bugreport

2005-04-12 Thread Chris Wright
* Amelia Nilsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I've found a bug in 2.6.11.6. I have a Toshiba laptop and when i did > run 2.6.11.6 my touchpad flipped out, it clicked everywhere when it > wasn't supposed to click. I couldn't even move my mouse without it was > clicking all over. It works fine i 2.6.

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: very basic desktop g5 sound support (#2)

2005-04-12 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > Um... why in the heck are you posting this here instead of alsa-devel? > > Which list do you think has more people interested? ppc64 or alsa? > > Pretty much anybody with a G5 will probab

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: very basic desktop g5 sound support (#2)

2005-04-12 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 21:32 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This patch hacks the current PowerMac Alsa driver to add some basic > > support of analog sound output to some desktop G5s. It has severe > > limitations though: > > > > - Only 4410

Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)

2005-04-12 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> There was a thread a few months ago where file-as-directory was > discussed extensively, after Namesys implemented it. That's where the > conversation on detachable mount points originated AFAIR. It will > probably happen at some point. > > A nice implemention of it in FUSE could push it along

RE: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-12 Thread David Schwartz
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:44:29AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > I would say that if not for the EULA, you could transfer ownership > > of the image to someone else. And if you legally acquired two copies of > > Windows, you could install both of them and transfer them. Otherwise, > > y

Re: NFS2 question, help, pls!

2005-04-12 Thread Trond Myklebust
ty den 12.04.2005 Klokka 15:22 (-0400) skreiv Xin Zhao: > I have very very fast network and is testing NFS2 over this kind of > network. I noticed that for standard work like read/write a large > file, compile kernels, the performance of NFS2 is good. But if I try > to decompress kernel tar file.

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: very basic desktop g5 sound support (#2)

2005-04-12 Thread Andreas Schwab
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I noticed that too on some models, not sure what's up at this > point. What about the headphone jack on the front ? That one appears to > work. Doesn't work either for me. Well, I'll have keep my workaround a bit longer until you are read

RE: FUSYN and RT

2005-04-12 Thread Daniel Walker
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 15:26, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > You should not need any of this if your user space mutexes are a > wrapper over the kernel space ones. The kernel handles everything > the same and there is no need to take care of any special cases or > variations [other than the ones im

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread David Eger
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:21:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Yes. A tree is defined by the blobs it references (and the subtrees) but > it doesn't _contain_ them. It just contains a pointer to them. A pointer to them? You mean a SHA1 hash of them? or what? Where is the *real* data stored

Re: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver

2005-04-12 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:21:15PM -0500, Kilau, Scott wrote: > > However, neither IBM nor Digi wants this thread's patch to be applied, > and yet Christoph wants to do it, completely out of spite, to break our > out-of-tree open source driver. > > This is the problem that I have. But that patch

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm3

2005-04-12 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >>> Hrm... I just noticed you have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled... Can you > >>> test without it and let me know if it makes a difference ? > >> > >> IIRC I had disabled that for rc2-mm2 and it didn't make a > >> difference. I'll disable it again when I try older versions. > >> > >> I just got anothe

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: very basic desktop g5 sound support (#2)

2005-04-12 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 00:33 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, I noticed that too on some models, not sure what's up at this > > point. What about the headphone jack on the front ? That one appears to > > work. > > Doesn't work either for

Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The full .git archive for 199 versions of the kernel (the 2.6.12-rc2 one > and a test-run of 198 patches from Andrew) is 111MB. In other words, > adding 198 "full" new kernels only grew the archive by 9MB (that's all > "actual disk usage" btw - the file

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm3

2005-04-12 Thread Martin J. Bligh
>> > See this patch from Steve French: > http://cifs.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5cifs/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, that fixed it. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/

Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning

2005-04-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:22:30PM -0500, Franco Sensei wrote: > Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > >It isn't enough. The same compiler and the same .config - yes. But that > >means you'd have no progress within, say, 2.6. Only bug fixes. > >There _is_ a tree like that - 2.6.11.Xs are only bugfixes. > > Ok

Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > Does that mean that the 64 K changes imported from bk would take ~ 3 GB? > Is that real? That's a _guess_. > Have to tried to import it? It would take days. > I'm going to import the CVS data (with cvsps) - as the CVS "misses" half > the chan

subject

2005-04-12 Thread Csányi András
unsubscribe linux-kernel -- -- Csanyi Andras -- www.slackware.com www.slackware.hu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >